Originally Posted by xjx388
You clearly cannot defend your position so you make up a straw man, all or none, to do battle with. You are arguing everyone should anally follow these 'rules' lest they have nothing upon which to base their ethical judgement.
That's a bizarre point of view. What if there is something for which no organization position paper exists?
What if there are two such position papers and they don't agree?
It's like you picture medical providers running around saying, "Oh no, what do I do, what do I do?"
It's mind boggling to me that you could actually believe that. So I don't think you do believe that. You are trying to justify the position you've taken and it takes a straw man to do that.