JFK Conspiracy Theories VII: Late November back in '63...
View Single Post
9th June 2018, 03:45 PM
Join Date: Dec 2011
Originally Posted by
I have been trying to establish that the federal regulations in 1963 stated that there should be bank endorsement stamps on PMO’s, stamps absent on the Hidell PMO. This has taken a very long time, but is at last settled and agreed upon.
You agree then that bank stamps are optional and their absence doesn't mean anything?
Or are you pretending still they must be present?
I have never ”refused” to provide evidence. I provide evidence if requested to do so in a specific and relevant manner.
Hanks ”method” [of requesting evidence] is not going to [get me to] provide any evidence since it has a completely different purpose. To create the the illusion of me not providing evidence when requested to do so.
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by HSienzant