Originally Posted by
tyr_13
As I already said in the post you quoted, the main difference is that I know what a woman is in context
This is the third time I ask you to give me your criteria for making this determination. You've said that the person's identification is not the only criterion, but you have avoided giving me a full list of them. Are you going to do this now?
Quote:
and your BS argument doesn't. It in fact denies such a context by assertion.
What are you talking about? We're simply using different criteria.
Quote:
That's why you are not arguing in good faith.
That comes back to exactly what I said: I'm not arguing in good faith because it's impossible to do so and not reach the same conclusion as you.
Quote:
The conclusions of my argument have the benefit of being true though.
Argument from decree. Very bold.
Quote:
If you think my argument is BS because it echoed your form, then the mirror argument served well to show your argument by your own standards is BS.
That doesn't follow at all. If I say you're ugly, and you respond that I'm ugly too, saying that your response is BS because you just threw back mine at me doesn't mean you're not ugly.