International Skeptics Forum - View Single Post - Why do you still believe that a collapse due to fire wouldn't be possible?

Sivan Kurzberg · 26th September 2010, 12:26 PM

Originally Posted by Patriots4Truth

yes it caused a part of the building to collapse.

http://img204.imageshack.us/img204/3...ickrvahidg.jpg

5.) The TU Delft building reportedly started burning around 9.30 in the morning. Around 13.30 an explosion was reported - it still took to 16.30 for only part of the building to collapse.
[ sources: www.soggen.nl..., www.nu.nl... and nos.nl... ]

What the debunkers will never be able to show is the sudden global collapse of an entire highrise complete in a matter of seconds. Especially of a building only on fire for about an hour.

26th September 2010, 12:26 PM	#22
Sivan Kurzberg Banned Join Date: Aug 2010 Posts: 156	Originally Posted by Patriots4Truth yes it caused a part of the building to collapse. http://img204.imageshack.us/img204/3...ickrvahidg.jpg 5.) The TU Delft building reportedly started burning around 9.30 in the morning. Around 13.30 an explosion was reported - it still took to 16.30 for only part of the building to collapse. [ sources: www.soggen.nl..., www.nu.nl... and nos.nl... ] What the debunkers will never be able to show is the sudden global collapse of an entire highrise complete in a matter of seconds. Especially of a building only on fire for about an hour.
Sivan Kurzberg Banned Join Date: Aug 2010 Posts: 156