Originally Posted by
Craig B
No; but he could make bets on it, and increase the odds in his favour by designing the enterprise to be attractive to a targeted category of victims: millions of libertarians are still being sucked in by this Ponzi scheme that masquerades as a better alternative to 'fiat' currency". I think that's what's being argued. If that is what happened it is poetic justice.
Bitcoin is NOT a ponzi scheme and it doesn't "masquerade" as anything other than exactly what it is.
The fact that you have to consistently find new adjectives to make bitcoin seem worse than it is is
your problem.