Originally Posted by
truethat
See how you are manipulating the statement?
Which is is suspicious to you:
Hacking into your girlfriends phone because she's been missing and you want to hear her messages? (Doing so with her sisters and family)
or using star 67 to hide your phone number when calling someone who has an appointment at your house?
(see how you minimized to" call someone three times?" If you are needing to do that, ask yourself why?)
Well, for starters, it was her
ex-boyfriend. Which certainly changes the dynamic of the relationship. Not sure why you chose to minimize that.
As far as which I find more suspicious?
Hmm... the perfectly legal and common action of blocking caller ID? Or illegally hacking into someone else's voicemail? Yeah, that's a tough one.
But you of course miss the point.
You are willing to believe the most innocuous explanation when it comes to an ex-boyfriend with no alibi illegally hacking into his missing ex-girlfriend's voicemail, but refuse to accept or acknowledge anything less than nefarious motives for Avery when he blocked caller ID while calling her.
There is a clear bias on display, and it's laughable that you accuse others of lacking in critical thought.