Originally Posted by
CynicalSkeptic
Did he do it or not? I don't know. It's certainly possible that he was the killer, but I'm still leaning toward reasonable doubt. And I realize that doubt was put in my mind by an extremely biased documentary. If I spent enough time reading into the prosecutions side, or if I had actually sat on the jury, I might feel differently.
Most of this "evidence" that was supposedly left out of the documentary has either been trumped up or outright fabricated by unethical scumbag and disgraced former prosecutor Ken Kratz.
SomedayGirl did a nice job addressing most of it earlier in the thread.
If you are interested in delving more into the case, I'd stick with actual court documents rather than talking points from Kratz.