Originally Posted by
johnny karate
That was the theory of the crime the prosecution presented. What other narrative am I supposed to use?
You seem to want to have you cake and eat it too.
You reject certain evidence as planted by corrupt cops, but have complete faith in other evidence collected by those same corrupt cops.
You reject the prosecution's theory of the how Avery committed the murder, but still believe Avery committed the murder.
I'm not sure how you are able to process such dissonant beliefs into anything resembling coherent thought.
Again, why are you arguing with US (not the cops) about their theory. Has anyone in this thread posted that the confession was correct and we think that he killed her the way Dassey said?
We've said this. He is guilty and the cops tried to plant more evidence to frame him. They got busted.
So I am rejecting what I consider planted evidence, namely the key in his office and the blood or DNA in the car.
So again for the last time (I'm gonna give up if you keep pretending I'm saying something else yet again)
I'm looking at the other evidence
A. Her body being on his property
B. Her body being BURNED on his property and him not noticing?
C. Her car being found hidden on his property with his DNA under the hood.
D. His phone calls and his attempt to block his phone number.
E. Him being the last person to see her alive
The only argument I've heard that seems legit about the phone number is that "how do we know he is the one who made it?" And it's cause he said he did...
But again, why would you try to hide your phone number from someone who has an appointment to meet you?