Originally Posted by
sir drinks-a-lot
Just a couple of posts ago you said they were "accused by a police officer of committing a crime that had occurred only in that officer's imagination".
Fair point. Substitute "charged with".
Originally Posted by
sir drinks-a-lot
And even that is a questionable statement, since the articles I have seen suggested that an employee thought they may have been trying to steal the TV.
OK, some people imagine that it may have happened in the employee's imagination too. There are some very imaginative people involved.
Dave