I thought that's what this thread was about - trying to determine what's different about NAWAC in Sharon's eyes.
She knows we're here and will participate (or not) on her own terms. I see no point in continually asking her to explain herself.
So far, she seems to be responding to the dust up as an example of us skeptics not being good skeptics but instead engaging in denialism.
Meanwhile, at Area X . . . a decided lack of bigfoots.
|