View Single Post
Old 11th August 2018, 04:15 AM   #166
byn63
Muse
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 895
Originally Posted by Henri McPhee View Post
The blond synthetic hair like fibers with no known source point directly at Helena Stoeckley being at the MacDonald murders.
Once again - NO THEY WERE NOT! The blonde synthetic "saran" fibers were sourced to one of Colette's hair pieces and to doll wigs in the FBI exemplar collection.

These fibers do not point to Helena's wig or any other persons cosmetic wig because (AS I HAVE TOLD YOU OVER AND OVER AND OVER AND OVER AND OVER AND OVER AND OVER AND OVER AND OVER AND OVER AND OVER AGAIN) cosmetic wigs were not made of saran in the 1960s to 1970s time frame. Cosmetic wigs required a tow fiber to create them, and saran could not be used to make a tow fiber at that time. PERIOD.

Just because you keep repeating this nonsense does not make it true. NOT ONE SINGLE PIECE OF SOURCED EVIDENCE POINTS TO ANY OF THE KNOWN INTRUDER SUSPECTS. PERIOD

Originally Posted by Henri McPhee View Post
Malone's prosaic explanation that it 'could be' that those fibers came from MacDonald dolls is about as likely as Murtagh's explanation for the black wool fibers around Colette's mouth, and on the murder weapon with no known source, was because there were some photos of Colette found once wearing a black dress!
Malone was not wrong, the most likely explanation for the blonde synthetic hair fibers found in the brush were from Kimmie and Kristy's doll collection. The FBI has exemplars (aka samples) of thousands of doll wigs. These exemplars include all the data (even which doll it was used on) and 2 of the hairs matched these exemplars. That inmate rushed to get rid of all the property having belonged to his family is a sign of consciousness of guilt.

Brian Murtagh's explanation of the dark wool fibers was that there was sufficient evidence showing the family wearing dark wool clothing. Wow, shocking isn't it! A family owning mittens, scarves, hats, sweaters, and coats that are made of dark wool! Not to mention the afghan that inmate "struggled" to get out from under.....it was crocheted henri - a very popular pattern during that time frame (I have one in the same pattern) many times made from the scraps of yarn left from other projects. HOWEVER, that too could have shed dark woolen fibers.....it has a dark woolen background and there was crime scene photos of that IN THE APARTMENT.

Originally Posted by Henri McPhee View Post
All this was withheld by Glisson and Murtagh at the MacDonald trial. Segal and Thornton knew nothing about it.
I call BULLSH!T! You have been told, you have been shown the documentation - THERE WAS NO SUPPRESSION OF EVIDENCE BY THE PROSECUTION. Also, Janice Glisson would not be the person to tell the defense anything! She was a lab technician not an attorney. The information on the saran and dark wool fibers was included in the discovery material. AND as I have told you OVER AND OVER AND OVER AND OVER AND OVER AND OVER AND OVER AND OVER AND OVER AND OVER AND OVER AND OVER AND OVER AND OVER AND OVER AND OVER AND OVER AGAIN the prosecution is not required to point out specific evidence to the defense. THE FACT THAT BERNIE DIDN'T BOTHER TO REVIEW THE MATERIAL OR HAVE THE MATERIAL REVIEWED IS ON HIM!!!!
byn63 is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top