View Single Post
Old 11th August 2018, 09:08 AM   #167
Henri McPhee
Illuminator
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Bristol UK
Posts: 4,037
Originally Posted by byn63 View Post
I call BULLSH!T! You have been told, you have been shown the documentation - THERE WAS NO SUPPRESSION OF EVIDENCE BY THE PROSECUTION. Also, Janice Glisson would not be the person to tell the defense anything! She was a lab technician not an attorney. The information on the saran and dark wool fibers was included in the discovery material. AND as I have told you OVER AND OVER AND OVER AND OVER AND OVER AND OVER AND OVER AND OVER AND OVER AND OVER AND OVER AND OVER AND OVER AND OVER AND OVER AND OVER AND OVER AGAIN the prosecution is not required to point out specific evidence to the defense. THE FACT THAT BERNIE DIDN'T BOTHER TO REVIEW THE MATERIAL OR HAVE THE MATERIAL REVIEWED IS ON HIM!!!!
That's a lie. Check your facts. Brady violations were deliberately made by the forensic labs and prosecutors and Judge Dupree so that the jury would never be informed, and the truth then be covered up for the public and corporate media and 4th Circuit judges.
Henri McPhee is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top