View Single Post
Old 11th August 2018, 11:00 PM   #170
JTF
Graduate Poster
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 1,509
As I Predicted

HENRIBOY: As I predicted, you responded to my decade long challenge with your own brand of cognitive chaos. Again, you need to educate yourself in regards to the distinctions between opinion and fact. The saran and dark woolen fibers were not sourced to a cosmetic wig or clothing worn by Helena Stoeckley, so any proposed link has no forensic value. You also ignore the fact that none of the 29 DNA exemplars matched Stoeckley's DNA profile. You also ignore the fact that no head hairs found at the crime scene microscopically matched exemplars obtained from Stoeckley in 1971. You also ignore the fact that no finger, palm or footprints collected at the crime scene matched exemplars obtained from Stoeckley in 1971. Need I go on?

http://www.macdonaldcasefacts.com

Last edited by JTF; 11th August 2018 at 11:04 PM.
JTF is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top