View Single Post
Old 15th August 2018, 04:38 AM   #189
byn63
Muse
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 895
Originally Posted by Henri McPhee View Post
The point is that Glisson was not at all sure about who caused the urine stain,
Glisson was sure that ONLY COLETTE OR KIMMIE could have made the urine stain. It was IMPOSSIBLE for either Kristy or inmate himself to have made that stain. When you take the FACT that urine stains WERE found on Kimmie's nightgown and panties and NO URINE stains were found on Colette's clothing one can state with a reasonable degree of scientific certainty that Kimmie made the urine stain.

Originally Posted by Henri McPhee View Post
and ninety weeks later the forensic technicians would have been even less sure.
The technicians were absolutely 100% sure it was not Kristy that made that urine stain since she was Type O blood and Type O blood does not contain Antigen A PERIOD. Even age of a stain cannot turn Antigen A into Antigen H.

Originally Posted by Henri McPhee View Post
As far as I'm concerned I believe MacDonald that it was Kristen who wet the bed
What part of MEDICALLY IMPOSSIBLE are you not understanding? IT IS NOT POSSIBLE FOR KRISTEN TO HAVE MADE THE URINE STAIN IN THE MASTER BEDROOM. ONLY COLETTE OR KIMBERLEY COULD HAVE MADE THAT STAIN. PERIOD.

Pay attention this time:

Colette - Type A - Antigen A and Anti-B Antibodies
Kimberley - Type AB - Antigen A and Antigen B
Kristen - Type O - Antigen H and Anti-A and Anti-B antibodies
inmate - Type B - Antigen B and Anti-A antibodies

The urine stain was tested and Antigen A was found no antibodies were found. So the only 2 persons in that house that could have made the urine stain are Colette and Kimmie. PERIOD.

Originally Posted by Henri McPhee View Post
and that's how Kristen got a pajama fiber under her fingernail,
WRONG! Kristen got the pj fiber under her nails while she was fighting off her father stabbing her. We know this because the pj fiber was totally saturated in her blood and was at first thought believed to be a blood clot. We also know this because of the defensive wounds on her poor little hands. NOT ONLY THAT BUT INMATE'S STORY OF INTRUDERS HAD YET TO TAKE PLACE SO HIS PJ TOP WAS NOT YET TORN WHEN (according to his lies) HE "TOOK" Kristen back to bed so he would not have been shedding fibers not would Kristen have been bleeding.

inmate's story does not match the evidence. that is plain and simple truth.
byn63 is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top