View Single Post
Old 5th September 2018, 09:00 AM   #281
Henri McPhee
Illuminator
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Bristol UK
Posts: 4,028
Originally Posted by JTF View Post
COMMENT: The bigger issue is why the authors ignore their own endnotes in relation to Malone's 1990 fiber analysis? The documented record clearly demonstrates that in 1989, the FBI was still in possession of the Q89 pajama fibers in the pillbox. In preparation for the hearing before Judge Dupree, the FBI took two color photographs of the pajama fibers in the pillbox and they were labeled as FBI Exhibits 76 and 77. The authors were aware of this FACT, but flat-out ignored it because it further debunked their claim that no pajama fibers were found on the club.

http://www.macdonaldcasefacts.com
So what? I could put your pajama fibers in a pillbox and take two color photographs of them and then present it to a court as evidence of murder. It only fools absurdly credulous people and con artists, and perhaps the average juror.
Henri McPhee is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top