View Single Post
Old 11th September 2018, 08:36 AM   #319
Henri McPhee
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Bristol UK
Posts: 4,043
Originally Posted by JTF View Post
Those prosaic explanations have to be false because there is simply no getting around the fact that Stoeckley claims she was at the crime scene and that she named the "real" perps in this case. MacDonald advocates are so fixated on the unshakable notion that Stoeckley is a credible witness that they do not feel responsible for answering in detail the explanations favoring another explanation.
What happened was that MacDonald gave a general description of his assailants at the time of the MacDonald murders and this was relayed to Detective Beasley, who was a front line local police officer. It fitted the Stoeckley gang who were known to the local police.

For some unknown reason best known to the genius detectives of the Army CID, with their brilliant detection, the suspects were disregarded by the Army CID. They were being held by Detective Beasley at the local police station. Beasley had to let the suspects go because of the CID lack of interest and the police records of their names were later mysteriously 'lost' probably by Murtagh and Blackburn. The Army CID had wrongly decided MacDonald did it right from the start. It was just the same in the JonBenet Ramsey case with the same sort of lousy detectives.

There is background information to all this in the cross-examination of Detective Beasley during the 1979 MacDonald trial:

Henri McPhee is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top