Originally Posted by
Stacyhs
Nice collection of falsehoods. I wasn't sure at first if this litany of falsehoods was Vixen's or Trump's. So much in common.You can add to the list her claim that Dr. Peter Gill said that DNA doesn't transfer after 24 hours and that there was no grill under Filomena's window at the time of the murder. There are more but there is, by necessity, a limit on how many can be posted due to space limitations.
Just to clarify the highlighted part: blood was found on Raff's underwear, but it was Knox's menstrual blood. Having no underwear due to her inability to access the cottage after the discovery of the murder, Amanda had to borrow Raff's underwear. This is why she bought the "sexy g-string lingerie" at Bubbles. Of course, it wasn't really sexy or a G-string (they were cotton with a cartoon cow on them), but why let facts get in the way of a good and lucrative story?
One of the most ridiculous claims made by the PGP is the notion there was a mountain of evidence and a solid case against Amanda and Raffaele when the conduct of the police/prosecution and the fact PGP have to resort to lying to argue their case indicates the complete opposite. The tactics the police/prosecution had to resort to are a textbook example of the tactics police/prosecutors would use when they have a weak case and a lack of evidence and the facts don’t support the prosecution’s case. For instance, there is a golden rule the prosecution should never have to resort to lying when they have a slam dunk case. As can be seen from the link I attached in a previous post, the prosecution told numerous lies. Vixen constantly bangs on about Amanda and Raffaele telling umpteen lies whilst slavishly defending corrupt prosecutors who told umpteen lies. One of numerous examples where PGP posters have defended liars whilst viciously attacking Amanda and Raffaele for lying.
I have attached the appeal documents for Amanda and Raffaele for the Hellman court and the Supreme Court ruling. The appeal documents for Amanda and Raffaele made very effective arguments which punched massive holes in the prosecution’s case. The Supreme Court motivation report ripped the prosecution’s case to shreds. How is this explained if there was a slam dunk case against Amanda and Raffaele?
http://www.injusticeinperugia.org/Appeal.html
http://www.injusticeinperugia.org/appeal4.html
http://www.amandaknoxcase.com/wp-con...ons-Report.pdf
Vixen likes to argue that there must be overwhelming evidence and a solid case if courts found Amanda and Raffaele guilty. This indicates PGP posters can’t think for themselves and automatically regard something as valid because a court says so. Courts can come to the wrong decision. In a country like Italy courts may find defendants guilty because an innocent verdict would undermine the reputation of the justice system. Judges may take the side of the prosecution.