View Single Post
Old 19th December 2020, 09:42 AM   #14
theprestige
Penultimate Amazing
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Hong Kong
Posts: 49,650
Originally Posted by Meadmaker View Post
To my way of thinking, that whole set of people who can have babies, plus the people who used to be able to have babies, or are likely to be able to have babies in the future, or who have most of the same organs, and but for some other medical condition could have babies, seems like a useful set to have a more concise term for. What is that group of people supposed to be called?
I'm confident that if you did come up with a term for this set of people, trans activists would insist that transwomen have a right to be honorary members of the set.

Hell, Boudicca has already said as much, and more.

Last edited by theprestige; 19th December 2020 at 09:43 AM.
theprestige is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Back to Top