Originally Posted by
Jabba
- The following is why, in broadest terms, the issue of blood and “serum clot retraction rings” is relevant to our debate re the validity of a carbon dating of the 14th century for the Shroud.
- I claim that the probability of a 14th century artist being able to create an image that includes numerous “serum clot retraction rings” on it approaches zero. Since I constitute one of the sides in this debate, my claim is relevant by definition.
- See what I mean?
--- Jabba
You don't even know if any of these marks even exist on the shroud ("clot rings" and "scourge"), do you?
You are simply accepting the unpublished claims of the same group of shroud believers all over again.
Can you give a reference to any independent scientist who has ever confirmed any such marks in any well known science journal?
Or are all your stories of clots and marks just yet more religious faith nonsense from shroud fanatics?
Where are your marks? Lets see them.