Originally Posted by
pakeha
I find it intriguing someone would try to present an idea, in this case, the notion there is blood on the shroud of Turin, here without marshalling their facts.
So, 100 pages and we're still waiting for some reason to doubt the dating of the shroud to the 14th century.
Has there been any reliable and verifiable evidence from the shroud pro-antiquity people at all? (That's for any aspect of the shroud)