Originally Posted by
Acleron
Has there been any reliable and verifiable evidence from the shroud pro-antiquity people at all? (That's for any aspect of the shroud)
It is reasonably certain that the shroud exists, though if it were claimed only by the Sindonologists I would doubt it.
Here is the entirety of the pro-authenticity argument, though it is dressed up impressively in sciency sounding terms and walls of text:
There is objective, unrefuted scientific proof that the shroud is a hoax as already demonstrated by the historical evidence. On the other hand, there is subjective speculation supported only by the biblical imaginings of a group of biased activists. Obviously, the speculation wins.