Originally Posted by
Ladewig
You and I have dramatically different ideas about what constitutes evidence. Individual testimonies on YouTube is not evidence. They are not even close to evidence. There are myriad reasons why YouTubers who never had a NDE might claim to have had one.
Originally Posted by
Maartenn100
That's the only evidence we have. You cannot go and measure the tunnel or the light with your instruments. Impossible. Eye witness testimony is the only thing you have to investigate this. Case studies with interviews.
You misunderstood my post.
I said that YouTube videos
cannot be considered eyewitness testimony because there is absolutely no evidence that the people making the videos have ever flatlined or otherwise experienced a NDE. YouTube is filled with liars who are more concerned with getting hits than with providing factual testimony that can be considered evidence.
YouTube stories are not eyewitness testimony.
YouTube stories are not evidence.
YouTube stories cannot be used to support your speculations.