View Single Post
Old 8th May 2019, 09:49 PM   #122
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 9,324
Originally Posted by arthwollipot View Post
Yes, I know that. I posted the original article, remember? I was responding to the idea that the whale's behaviour suggested that it wasn't military. If you were going to use the whale to carry a bomb to blow up a ship, you'd train it to seek out ships and people, not to avoid them. Do I think that's what this whale was actually trained for? No, I don't. But its apparent friendliness in no way disproves the idea that it had been trained by the military.

Yes, it does, at least if you take your idea seriously. If you'd want it to blow up a ship, you'd want it to seek out ships, not people. For that purpose, you'd want it to remain hidden, not to start playing with people and give them time to notice the bomb and kill the whale before it exploded.
"Stupidity renders itself invisible by assuming very large proportions. Completely unreasonable claims are irrefutable. Ni-en-leh pointed out that a philosopher might get into trouble by claiming that two times two makes five, but he does not risk much by claiming that two times two makes shoe polish." B. Brecht
"The abolition of religion as the illusory happiness of the people is required for their real happiness. The demand to give up the illusion about its condition is the demand to give up a condition which needs illusions." K. Marx
dann is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top