View Single Post
Old 1st April 2020, 02:13 PM   #1789
Sol88
Philosopher
 
Sol88's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 6,595
Originally Posted by jonesdave116 View Post
More lying. No radial field. Fact. And I have run away from nothing, you lying clown. I have told you, repeatedly, that the electric fields only exist courtesy of the outgassing. How many times do you need telling before it penetrates your thick skull? Go troll somewhere else.


Oh Dear




Nice farietale but will need some significant updating to save the dirtysnowball!

For instance and I'm not too sure why you struggle to understand

Quote:
Our findings reject the idea that comets are fluffy aggregates, instead, they are characterised by consolidated surfaces.
Quote:
The nucleus is thus a highly porous very dusty body with very little ice.
Quote:
The more we visit comets, the dustier they appear.

Quote:
Though the post-impact spectrum is still being analyzed, it shows that Tempel 1's ejecta contain the following chemicals: smectite clay; iron-containing compounds; carbonates, the minerals in seashells; crystallized silicates, such as the green olivine minerals found on beaches and in the gemstone peridot; and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, which are carbon-containing compounds found in car exhaust and on burnt toast.
Quote:
Whipple’s [2] model of the dirty snowball, the first quantitative model, envisioned cometary nuclei as mostly ice, although our understanding has been evolving more toward mostly rock,
Struggling still there jonesdave116?

Your mission and to make sense of YOUR model, reconcile these statements...

The nucleus is thus a highly porous very dusty body with very little ice, The more we visit comets, the dustier they appear. Right so dusty and porous.

to reconcile with Our findings reject the idea that comets are fluffy aggregates, instead, they are characterised by consolidated surfaces.

Mainstream cant even get their $^#% together even with all the "smart" people and $$$$

Have a go ya mug!

__________________
“No rock. Any charge separation is limited. The electric field is pointing in the wrong direction. Currents are doing nothing.” Jonesdave116.

“The 'electric comet' is physically IMPOSSIBLE to model using mainstream science! PERIOD! True story! End of story!” Indagator

Last edited by Sol88; 1st April 2020 at 02:21 PM.
Sol88 is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Back to Top