View Single Post
Old 2nd December 2019, 06:27 PM   #980
jonesdave116's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2015
Posts: 5,037
To simplify...Haser model is wrong.
No, it is not wrong. And does not alter the fact that they are detecting neutral water vapour, and that you don't understand the science, and therefore the paper. Deal with that, instead of spamming your idiotic, failed woo.

The Nucleus of Comet 67P/ChuryumovGerasimenko - Part I: The Global View – nucleus mass, mass loss, porosity and implications

Yup using the Haser model, there must be ice everywhere on mostly icy comets. The above paper, whilst poo pooed, is a good indicator that all is not well with the Dirtysnowball.

Or whatever model mainstream now use.

Problem is it’s all hidden.
Another idiotic post, sidestepping the obvious failure of the electric comet woo. They detect water. The amount Patzold (who is likely wrong) calls for, is still waaaaay more than you can explain. In fact, you cannot explain a single millilitre of it, let alone hundreds of thousands to millions of tonnes of it. Deal with that, yes? YOU. CANNOT. EXPLAIN. IT. Clear?
“There is in every village a torch - the teacher; and an extinguisher - the priest.” - Victor Hugo

“Never argue with an idiot. They will only bring you down to their level and beat you with experience.” - George Carlin

Last edited by jonesdave116; 2nd December 2019 at 06:31 PM.
jonesdave116 is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Back to Top