3rd December 2019, 12:42 PM
|
#998
|
|
Philosopher
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 6,467
|
Originally Posted by jonesdave116
Little hint for the hard of thinking - the high temperature material must have originated in the inner solar system. From there, it is blown outwards by the activity of the young Sun. As I believe we have observed (not the material, but the activity that would send it into the far reaches). And the instruments certainly don't have error bars of > 300 K! That would be a bit useless, and not worth putting on the spacecraft! It was ~ 5 K at Tempel 1 and Hartley 2.
The temperature, thermal inertia, roughness and color of the nuclei of Comets 103P/Hartley 2 and 9P/Tempel 1
Groussin, O. et al. (2013)
https://www.sciencedirect.com/scienc...19103512004095
Well Mr plasma expert, it is blown outwards by the activity of the young Sun. Blown? As if blowing in the wind?
Must have? According to the Dirtysnowball model?
|
__________________
“No rock. Any charge separation is limited. The electric field is pointing in the wrong direction. Currents are doing nothing.” Jonesdave116.
“The 'electric comet' is physically IMPOSSIBLE to model using mainstream science! PERIOD! True story! End of story!” Indagator
|
|
|