Originally Posted by Orphia Nay
yes, true, I was banned
a good fortnight ago. Currently searching for the boot that came down upon me...
The build-up was on pages 3 and 4 of this thread (which then continued with truly excellent explanations by Kat Dorman on why the commonest CD-arguments are false and why Bazant is largely
spot-on within the confines of his model assumptions
- makes sure you read it, if structural response to collapse interests you):
I don't quite get what problem he had with me. Some splitting of hairs over what value DSC testing has towards the objectives of Harrit on one and Millette on the other hand, or perhaps out different evaluation on wherein Jones's and Harrit's fraud lies.
Other abuses headed my way shortly before my execution are found here
SnowCrash STILL hasn't understood that the problem with Harrit/Jones is not their data but their false interpretation of it - he thinks the data is solid proof of a thermite reaction when in reality it isn't at all:
Originally Posted by SnowCrash
It was unequivocal only in its false conclusions
which don't follow from the data.
He is a very disturbed individual, and YT is a fool that he lets such a loose cannon "moderate" his forum.