Merged What the quran really says.

My question is why should we care what Quran really says? Why not the Bhagavad Gita, the Kojiki, the Zend Avesta, the Guru Granth Sahib, the Agamas, the Kitáb-i-Aqdas or the Satanic Bible?

Seriously. Why not the Lord of the Rings? One nonsense book after another. At least the Lord of the Rings was entertaining.
 
acbytesla said:
My question is why should we care what Quran really says? Why not the Bhagavad Gita, the Kojiki, the Zend Avesta, the Guru Granth Sahib, the Agamas, the Kitáb-i-Aqdas or the Satanic Bible?

Seriously. Why not the Lord of the Rings? One nonsense book after another. At least the Lord of the Rings was entertaining.
Click to expand...
If everyone was of that opinion there would be no difficulty. Baron Munchausen creates no problems for society; but his book would soon do so, if hundreds of millions of its readers persuaded themselves that it is the unerring word of God.
 
Craig B said:
If everyone was of that opinion there would be no difficulty. Baron Munchausen creates no problems for society; but his book would soon do so, if hundreds of millions of its readers persuaded themselves that it is the unerring word of God.
Click to expand...

I've come to the conclusion that people are morons. That man is barely smarter than chimpanzees. Time and time again, I see people gravitate to the convenient answer from someone ignorant as opposed to any idea that is view altering from the highly educated.
 
Kumar said:
Answer to my question should be just ABC of anything or of any Philosophy or of any science. Refer, one story given be me in other topic. We need to check what shall we be getting by our choice. Just walking, an old car, an intermediate car or a latest car. Everyone will have its own merits and demerits.
Click to expand...

I'm sure this is a puzzle of some sort. Let me try something.

question just getting of anything or of any will have any science. Refer, one story check what shall we in other topic. We need to Answer to my be ABC by our choice. Just walking, an old Philosophy or of car, an intermediate car or a latest car. Everyone should be its own merits and given be me demerits.
Click to expand...

...Damn. That sounds just as rational.
 
Argumemnon said:
I'm sure this is a puzzle of some sort. Let me try something.



...Damn. That sounds just as rational.
Click to expand...

Yes, it is not rational but mine is not so irrational.

Why can't behavior of followers can be attuned in accordance to theological suggestions? Truthful= truthful, Rational=rational, Irrational = irrational
 
Kumar said:
Yes, it is not rational but mine is not so irrational.

Why can't behavior of followers can be attuned in accordance to theological suggestions? Truthful= truthful, Rational=rational, Irrational = irrational
Click to expand...

You begin suggesting there might be degrees of irrationality, then try to claim irrational=irrational, a 1:1 correspondence. Of course, this would lend some tenuous credence to your obsession with A&F which has innumerable times in innumerable threads by innumerable posters been shown as a fantasy.
 
Peregrinus said:
You begin suggesting there might be degrees of irrationality, then try to claim irrational=irrational, a 1:1 correspondence. Of course, this would lend some tenuous credence to your obsession with A&F which has innumerable times in innumerable threads by innumerable posters been shown as a fantasy.
Click to expand...

That was just cause and effect related not salvation/liberation of soul(A&F) related. A question pls;

What is the nature of nature and what is the nature of society/Civility? Is just violence vs peace?
 
Argumemnon said:
I'm sure this is a puzzle of some sort. Let me try something.



...Damn. That sounds just as rational.
Click to expand...

A question pls;

What is the nature of Nature and what is the nature of Society/Civility? Is just violence vs peace?
 
Kumar said:
That was just cause and effect related not salvation/liberation of soul(A&F) related.
Click to expand...
Suddenly, as from nowhere, just like your other blatherings, we have salvation and soul possibly linked with A&F. And there's not a shred of evidence for any of it.

A question pls;

What is the nature of nature and what is the nature of society/Civility? Is just violence vs peace?
Click to expand...

Nature is the nature of nature. Deal with it. Society, civility, violence & peace are all human abstractions with not firm referent in reality.
 
Peregrinus said:
Suddenly, as from nowhere, just like your other blatherings, we have salvation and soul possibly linked with A&F. And there's not a shred of evidence for any of it.



Nature is the nature of nature. Deal with it. Society, civility, violence & peace are all human abstractions with not firm referent in reality.
Click to expand...

Then, why can't we think that few religions are derived nature's rules, so based on nature whereas others derived Society, Civility, Peace etc. rules so based on these? Both can hold their validity even though they support violence, cruelty and other odds of nature provided nature support it?
 
Kumar said:
Then, why can't we think that few religions are derived nature's rules, so based on nature whereas others derived Society, Civility, Peace etc. rules so based on these? Both can hold their validity even though they support violence, cruelty and other odds of nature provided nature support it?
Click to expand...

Name a religion based on "nature's rules." Just one. Name a religion based on civility. Just one. A religion "derived" from peace yet supports violence? Gonna get lots of Trump supporters but not much else. Whatinthehell does "hold their validity even though they support violence, cruelty and other odds of nature" mean? If anything? And just which "both" are your incoherent statements referring to? Is there some Rosetta Stone that can aid in deciphering your gobbledygook?
 
Peregrinus said:
Name a religion based on "nature's rules." Just one. Name a religion based on civility. Just one. A religion "derived" from peace yet supports violence? Gonna get lots of Trump supporters but not much else. Whatinthehell does "hold their validity even though they support violence, cruelty and other odds of nature" mean? If anything? And just which "both" are your incoherent statements referring to? Is there some Rosetta Stone that can aid in deciphering your gobbledygook?
Click to expand...

I feel, you should have been able to easily understood it by my these discussions and discussions in other topic. First we need to justify, whether anything can happen beyond the nature. If no then whatever happen, done or preferred is a part of nature. So "all nature/natural" will be the absolute fact. Whether any being can do independent of nature is a big thought. Difference among different things should only depend on its level of its basis--whether prime/basic or gross, whether basic natural or gross natural(or social/civil). Both way, it still can hold validity. Moreover nature is not just one sided approach. It can support both creation and destruction for its balance.
 
Rules of nature: Kill or get killed. Eat or be eaten. Attack is the best defense.

Rules of society and religion: Thou shalt not kill. Thou shalt not eat human flesh. Thou shalt not attack others.
 
JJM 777 said:
Rules of nature: Kill or get killed. Eat or be eaten. Attack is the best defense.
Click to expand...

Parents-children & companions relations don't do it. Nature should not be just one sided i.e toward destruction, otherwise we would have not existed.

Rules of society and religion: Thou shalt not kill. Thou shalt not eat human flesh. Thou shalt not attack others.
Click to expand...

It is also not one way. Otherwise there would have been no need of police, army, weapons etc.

Whatever, main sense is, since nature and society(gross nature) can be both sided, anything on any side, can still justify in nature or in society.
 
You're paraphrasing good old Dr. Moreau!

JJM 777 said:
Rules of nature: Kill or get killed. Eat or be eaten. Attack is the best defense.

Rules of society and religion: Thou shalt not kill. Thou shalt not eat human flesh. Thou shalt not attack others.
Click to expand...

What is the law?

"Not to go on all fours! Are we not men?"

What is the law?

"Not to go naked! Are we not men?"

WHAT IS THE LAW?

"Not to eat meat! Are we not men?"

u.s.w. A&F. TTTT. OMFG.
 
Originally Posted by Peregrinus:
So, then! Once again, all bets are off.

Kumar's reply:
Yes, probably nothing is odd.

There are three possibilities here (at least):
You're trolling.
You're playing both sides.
You have no ability to recognize irony.

Possibly all three.
 
Peregrinus said:
Originally Posted by Peregrinus:
So, then! Once again, all bets are off.

Kumar's reply:
Yes, probably nothing is odd.

There are three possibilities here (at least):
You're trolling.
You're playing both sides.
You have no ability to recognize irony.

Possibly all three.
Click to expand...

Just considering both sides.
 
Muhammad did not preach peace, he taught war.

Quran surah 2.216 from the M.M. Pickthall translation

Warfare is ordained for you, though it is distasteful unto you: But it may happen that you hate a thing which is good for you, and it may happen that you love a thing which is bad for you. And Allah knows, but you know not.
 
acbytesla said:
My question is why should we care what Quran really says? Why not the Bhagavad Gita, the Kojiki, the Zend Avesta, the Guru Granth Sahib, the Agamas, the Kitáb-i-Aqdas or the Satanic Bible?

Seriously. Why not the Lord of the Rings? One nonsense book after another. At least the Lord of the Rings was entertaining.
Click to expand...

We should care what the Quran really says because some people who believe it is the word of God do terrible things because of what is in it.

I do not know most of the other books you mention, except the Bhagavad Gita of which I have a copy. It is a very inspiring book, although it is only part of the Mahabharata, a very long work of fiction.
 
Scorpion said:
We should care what the Quran really says because some people who believe it is the word of God do terrible things because of what is in it.
Click to expand...


The Quran
Relationship with other literature
The Bible

The Quran attributes its relationship with former books (the Torah and the Gospels) to their unique origin, saying all of them have been revealed by the one God...

The Quran recounts stories of many of the people and events recounted in Jewish and Christian sacred books (Tanakh, Bible) and devotional literature (Apocrypha, Midrash), although it differs in many details. Adam, Enoch, Noah, Eber, Shelah, Abraham, Lot, Ishmael, Isaac, Jacob, Joseph, Job, Jethro, David, Solomon, Elijah, Elisha, Jonah, Aaron, Moses, Zechariah, John the Baptist and Jesus are mentioned in the Quran as prophets of God (see Prophets of Islam). In fact, Moses is mentioned more in the Quran than any other individual. Jesus is mentioned more often in the Quran than Muhammad, while Mary is mentioned in the Quran more than the New Testament.
Click to expand...

If we should care what the Quran 'really' says then we should care what the Christian Bible says too, particularly those of us who live in a 'Christian nation' such as the U.S.

Terrorism in the United States
According to a 2017 report by the U.S. Government Accountability Office, "of the 85 violent extremist incidents that resulted in death since September 12, 2001, right wing violent extremist groups were responsible for 62 (73 percent) while radical Islamist violent extremists were responsible for 23 (27 percent)... In 2018, most ideologically motivated murders were linked to right-wing extremism.
Click to expand...

Right-wing terrorism
Right-wing terrorism or far-right terrorism is terrorism that is motivated by a variety of different right-wing and far-right ideologies, most prominently by neo-Nazism, neo-fascism, white nationalism, white separatism, ethnonationalism, religious nationalism, and anti-government patriot/sovereign citizen beliefs and occasionally by anti-abortion and tax resistance. Modern right-wing terrorism first emerged in North America during the Reconstruction era
Click to expand...

Christian terrorism
Christian terrorism comprises terrorist acts by groups or individuals who profess Christian motivations or goals. Christian terrorists justify their violent tactics through their interpretation of the Bible, in accordance with their own objectives and world view...

History
Ku Klux Klan

Vehemently anti-Catholic, the 1915 Klan had an explicitly Protestant Christian terrorist ideology, basing its beliefs in part on a "religious foundation" in Protestant Christianity and targeting Jews, Catholics, and other social or ethnic minorities... the goals of the KKK included an intent to "reestablish Protestant Christian values in America by any means possible"...
Mark Juergensmeyer, a former president of the American Academy of Religion... categorizes contemporary Christian terrorists as being a part of "religious activists from Algeria to Idaho, who have come to hate secular governments with an almost transcendent passion and dream of revolutionary changes that will establish a godly social order in the rubble of what the citizens of most secular societies regard as modern, egalitarian democracies"
Click to expand...


Clearly the Christian Bible is just as much - if not more - worthy of our 'care' as the Quran.

But why stop there? No doubt other religious texts have also been used to justify doing terrible things - and secular writings too! White nationalism is on the rise so we should all care about what Hitler wrote in Mein Kampf, and Libertarian ideology threatens the entire planet so Ayn Rand's Atlas Shrugged is an essential read.

And those are just the obvious ones. We must be forever vigilant in rooting out cults of all persuasions and 'caring' about their religious texts. Take 'science fiction fans' for example. They will tell you that all the violence and horror in their books is just for entertainment. But when we examine what it really says something far more sinister is revealed. Isaac Asimov’s Foundation series was the inspiration for AUM Shinrikyo, a Japanese religious group that killed 13 people and injured over 5000 in the Tokyo subway sarin attack of 1995. But talk to any SF follower today and they will try to minimize the involvement of their sacred texts in this atrocity and others.
 
Last edited:
We should care what spiritualists say too, because their dogma about karma etc can lead them to justify doing nothing about other peoples' suffering.

Pretty much any kind of unevidenced belief has unfortunate consequences.
 
realpaladin said:
I second that.

As I said, I suspect Scorpion of trying to rouse us into an anti Islam frenzy.

Scorpion, you are correct in that the quran is incorrect in a lot of things.

That is no surprise.

But what do you want to do with that knowledge?
Click to expand...



I often ask this question to myself.
Ok now I'm an ex-muslim, one who can argue well against islam since I devoted such lifetime and mental energy to it in that I could have mastered 2 foreign languages, and I can at least leave a very bad taste, that won't leave, in any muslim who gets into it with me.
I've done it over and over, hundreds of times. Mostly on you tube commentaries.
First, I found that the religion is still consuming me, my time and mental energy, regardless of the side that I'm on, that bothered me a lot. I don't have to live my life telling every believer (and they're everywhere) that I don't believe in eternal burning for many reasons I have and they should have too. I have a limited time to live and religion is only one of the things that bother me in life. Going at it only robs me of that time. And people who are in it most likely enjoy it anyway.
But when I think about it on a larger scale, that is where I came from how the society has been formed through the history, if I succeeded in one televised debate to deconvert a whole country I don't know what would hold them together. You see, religion and pride in history as wrong as they can be has had a function in the forming of the society I found myself in. While it had a function in keeping them backward in many aspects of life, at the same time.
So the question gets deeper than, "I'll show anyone who threatens me with eternal punishment and social ostracism the truth of their religion".
 
I am bouncing this thread because I do not want to have a discussion in the arts section.
I have said on the 'what book are you reading' thread, That I just read the book,
'The complete infidels guide to the Koran ' by Robert Spencer. I recommended it to anyone interested in what the Quran actually says. It cuts to the core of the Quran and I have said it is an accurate honest description of what the Quran is all about.
I was called to account for that, and Robert Spencer was denounced as an islamophobe.

If he is one then so am I, because my reading of the Quran, which I did 20 years ago, tells me it is a book of evil lies about God. It is also the source of the violence demonstrated by many Muslims. They are only doing what the unholy Quran tells them to. Which is kill infidels, and leads to things like crashing planes into skyscrapers, and blowing up busses and tube trains.

I also purchased the book, 'The critical Quran' by Robert Spencer and I recommended that too to anyone interested in understanding the entire Quran. It is a criticism of the entire Pickthall translation of the Quran. It is well worth reading if like me, you want to stop Britain from becoming an Islamic state, which is the stated aim of many Muslim immigrants. It seems more and more likely. If we go down their next target will be the USA.
I do not think it will happen in my lifetime, because their prediction is it will happen by 2050. I will be dead by that time, and if I am not they will probably behead me under sharia law. Which says the penalty for blasphemy against Muhammad is beheading.

I have and will blaspheme Muhammad relentlessly on the internet, because I think he was a lying, evil, perverted scumbag.
 
Last edited:
Scorpion said:
I am bouncing this thread because I do not want to have a discussion in the arts section.
I have said on the 'what book are you reading' thread, That I just read the book,
'The complete infidels guide to the Koran ' by Robert Spencer. I recommended it to anyone interested in what the Quran actually says. It cuts to the core of the Quran and I have said it is an accurate honest description of what the Quran is all about.
I was called to account for that, and Robert Spencer was denounced as an islamophobe.

If he is one then so am I, because my reading of the Quran, which I did 20 years ago, tells me it is a book of evil lies about God. It is also the source of the violence demonstrated by many Muslims. They are only doing what the unholy Quran tells them to. Which is kill infidels, and leads to things like crashing planes into skyscrapers, and blowing up busses and tube trains.

I also purchased the book, 'The critical Quran' by Robert Spencer and I recommended that too to anyone interested in understanding the entire Quran. It is a criticism of the entire Pickthall translation of the Quran. It is well worth reading if like me, you want to stop Britain from becoming an Islamic state, which is the stated aim of many Muslim immigrants. It seems more and more likely. If we go down their next target will be the USA.
I do not think it will happen in my lifetime, because their prediction is it will happen by 2050. I will be dead by that time, and if I am not they will probably behead me under sharia law. Which says the penalty for blasphemy against Muhammad is beheading.

I have and will blaspheme Muhammad relentlessly on the internet, because I think he was a lying, evil, perverted scumbag.
Click to expand...
But, like all "holy" books it contradicts itself. In Surah al-Muzzamil it says to give unbelievers a graceful avoidance and let them in peace a while and after that leave them to Allah. Typically extremists prefer the "Sword Surah" TO al-Muzzamil

It says in on place not to force anyone to religion and in another it says to force people to religion.

It says in one place that "this is the book in which there can be no doubt" and in another place seems to be suggesting a large use of figurative language in the Quran.

But I think that if someone is interested in what the Quran says then they should read it themselves, mostly it is quite straightforward.
 
Scorpion said:
I do not think it will happen in my lifetime, because their prediction is it will happen by 2050. I will be dead by that time, and if I am not they will probably behead me under sharia law. Which says the penalty for blasphemy against Muhammad is beheading.
Click to expand...
Looxury! I dream of a nice quick beheading. They want to throw me off high building, crush me under 'eavy weight, stone me to death or just lock me in somewhere and let me die of thirst.


NB, seriously this is what all the major schools of Islamic jurisprudence say, not just ISIS type extremists.
 
Last edited:
Robin said:
But, like all "holy" books it contradicts itself. In Surah al-Muzzamil it says to give unbelievers a graceful avoidance and let them in peace a while and after that leave them to Allah. Typically extremists prefer the "Sword Surah" TO al-Muzzamil

It says in on place not to force anyone to religion and in another it says to force people to religion.

It says in one place that "this is the book in which there can be no doubt" and in another place seems to be suggesting a large use of figurative language in the Quran.

But I think that if someone is interested in what the Quran says then they should read it themselves, mostly it is quite straightforward.
Click to expand...

Thanks for those discrepancies. It says in the Quran if it were not from God you would find discrepancies or contradictions in it. Quran 4.82

If someone wants to know what is in the Quran before reading it I recommend Robert Spencer's book. 'The complete infidels guide to the Koran'
It will help them to understand the Quran when they come to read it. It is an affordable paperback.

I recommend a person who has not read the Quran to read it backward. From surah 114. The Quran is not chronological and the shortest surahs at the back are easier to read than plowing through surah 2. Mostly the surahs at the back were written first anyway.
The first surah reading it from the back that gives an idea of what Muhammad was all about is surah 111, in which he condemns his own aunt and uncle to burn in hell because they went around telling people he was a false prophet.

If they want to spend the money they could not do better than buy Spencer's
'The critical Quran' which is the complete Pickthall translation with copious critical notes on each surah.

I have the M.M.Pickthall translation, which I got free from Saudi Arabia, and I have written all over it making notes. For that alone I would be killed. I also have the Yusuf Ali translation with commentaries.
I think these two translations are probably the best English translations. It is useful to have more than one translation to compare so you do not make the mistake of taking any one translations verses absolutely literally.
Muslims will tell you that you cannot understand it unless you read it in Arabic. But that is cobblers. It does loose the poetic qualities it has in Arabic, but the texts are generally understandable.
 
Last edited:
My fave sura is Al Haq Patooie, "the Spoiled Soup," where it sez, "The infidels are like a medley of boiling beans, all different and impossible to count. The Messenger told you already, yes, dump them out and start over. His poetry is bollocks deep. Selah. Okay?"

Take note, "okay" is in the original, so now we may be at peace about the origin of the word. Same with algebra and alcohol. Sux 2 B a Christian, huh?
 
Scorpion said:
I am bouncing this thread because I do not want to have a discussion in the arts section.
I have said on the 'what book are you reading' thread, That I just read the book,
'The complete infidels guide to the Koran ' by Robert Spencer. I recommended it to anyone interested in what the Quran actually says. It cuts to the core of the Quran and I have said it is an accurate honest description of what the Quran is all about.
Click to expand...
You and Robert Spencer have no idea what the Quran is all about.

The Complete Infidel's Guide to the Koran
by Robert Spencer

The Complete Infidel’s Guide to the Koran exposes how the Koran incites hatred and violence and is anti-democratic, anti-freedom, and intolerant of any other ideology. Stripping out the obsolete debate, The Complete Infidel’s Guide to the Koran focuses on the decrees toward Jews and Christians, how they were viewed by Muhammad, what “the infidels” have done wrong and what the Koran has in store for them...

In The Complete Infidel’s Guide to the Koran you will learn:...

- Why Obama, Clinton, and others are dangerously close to supporting a multiculturalism based on an ideology that aims to destroy the principles America holds dear
Click to expand...
So Robert, where's your book on 'The complete heretics guide to the Bible', where you focus on what Christians have in store for everyone else?
 
Roger Ramjets said:
You and Robert Spencer have no idea what the Quran is all about.
Click to expand...

Oh yea! Do you want to go toe to toe with me dismantling the meaning of the Quran verse by verse? I read the Quran all through twice 20 years ago, and constantly refer to it reading verses to refresh my mind.

I can tell you the meaning of the Quran in a sentence.

It says obey Allah and the messenger.

It says this many times through out the Quran. That means obey Muhammad. Fight for him and die for him and give him one fifth of the spoils of war, or you will burn in hellfire forever.

I do not give a damn what is says in the bible and I don't suppose Robert Spence does either. because Christians and Jews do not want to take over the world. But it is the stated aim of many Muslims and they are doing it right now. I believe countries like Iran and Saudi Arabia are funding the invasion of Britain by paying young men to come here claiming to be refugees. Saudi Arabia also funds the building of mosques, and there are estimated to be up to three thousand mosques in Britain today.
The London mayor is trying to erase our culture and import more Muslims.
There are many cities in England now with Muslim mayors. If you want I can give you a list. Now Humza Yousaf is taking over Scotland.
 
Scorpion said:
Oh yea! Do you want to go toe to toe with me dismantling the meaning of the Quran verse by verse?
Click to expand...
'Dismantling the meaning', verse by verse? Like I said, you have no idea...

I read the Quran all through twice 20 years ago, and constantly refer to it reading verses to refresh my mind.
Click to expand...
What a waste. I've read it zero times, and yet I understand more about it than you do.

I can tell you the meaning of the Quran in a sentence.

It says obey Allah and the messenger.
Click to expand...
Allah is supernatural, and therefore by definition does not exist. Nobody can be a messenger for an entity that doesn't exist.

It says this many times through out the Quran. That means obey Muhammad. Fight for him and die for him and give him one fifth of the spoils of war, or you will burn in hellfire forever.
Click to expand...
Not that different from the Bible.

I do not give a damn what is says in the bible and I don't suppose Robert Spence does either. because Christians and Jews do not want to take over the world.
Click to expand...
You're kidding, right? Nobody can be that ignorant.

But it is the stated aim of many Muslims and they are doing it right now. I believe countries like Iran and Saudi Arabia are funding the invasion of Britain by paying young men to come here claiming to be refugees.
Click to expand...
Doesn't seem to be working...

FACTS ABOUT REFUGEES
Are there many refugees and asylum seekers in the UK?

No. According to UNHCR statistics, as of November 2022 there were 231,597 refugees, 127,421 pending asylum cases and 5,483  stateless persons  in the UK including recent Ukrainians refugees.

That’s only half a per cent (0.54%) of the UK’s total population.
Click to expand...



Scorpion said:
Saudi Arabia also funds the building of mosques, and there are estimated to be up to three thousand mosques in Britain today.
Click to expand...
There are about forty thousand churches in the UK, more than the number of pubs. This despite the fact that less than 6% of UK citizens are 'practicing' Christians.

The London mayor is trying to erase our culture and import more Muslims.
There are many cities in England now with Muslim mayors. If you want I can give you a list. Now Humza Yousaf is taking over Scotland.
Click to expand...

‘Facts’ about UK Muslims are mostly wrong
21 December 2022
Mosque numbers

The post claims there are over 3,000 mosques.

In 2020, the Muslim Council of Britain said in written evidence to the Lords Public Services committee on the subject of lessons from the coronavirus pandemic, that there are “about 1,200 mosques” in Britain...

Muslim mayors

The post claims that the mayors of London, Birmingham, Leeds, Blackburn, Sheffield, Oxford, Luton, Oldham and Rochdale are all Muslim. This is almost certainly not true now, although they have all had Muslim mayors at some point in the past...

London currently has a directly elected mayor who is Muslim—Sadiq Khan. A few of the other places listed appear to have Muslim mayors at the moment, but not all.
Click to expand...
 
Righty oh then ! In order to save myself the tedious task of creating separate boxes for each of your quotes, I am typing in my comments between them in capitols.

Roger Ramjets said:
'Dismantling the meaning', verse by verse? Like I said, you have no idea...
What a waste. I've read it zero times, and yet I understand more about it than you do.

DON'T TALK RUBBISH, IF YOU HAVE NOT READ IT, YOU DO NOT KNOW WHAT YOU ARE TALKING ABOUT.

Allah is supernatural, and therefore by definition does not exist. Nobody can be a messenger for an entity that doesn't exist.

1.8 BILLION MUSLIMS BELIEVE IT IS THE WORD OF GOD, AND THEY THINK THEY ARE OBEYING HIM WHEN THEY KILL INFIDELS.

Not that different from the Bible.

TO HELL WITH THE BIBLE,IT MAKE NO DIFFERENCE WHAT IT SAYS BECAUSE IT IS ISLAM THAT TEACHES MUSLIMS TO DESPISE UNBELIEVERS. THE OTHER RELIGIONS ARE LARGELY BENIGHN IN THE PRESENT WORLD.

You're kidding, right? Nobody can be that ignorant.

JUST WHAT CONQUESTS OF OTHER NATIONS ARE JEWS AND CHRISTIANS PLANNING?

Doesn't seem to be working...

IT IS WORKING, BRITAIN IS BEING SWAMPED BY YOUNG MEN WHO THROW AWAY THEIR PASSPORTS SO THEY CAN LIE ABOUT THEIR ORIGIN
AND CLAIM THEY ARE ASYLUM SEEKERS.



There are about forty thousand churches in the UK, more than the number of pubs. This despite the fact that less than 6% of UK citizens are 'practicing' Christians.

I HAVE SEEN THE NUMBER OF MOSQUES QUOTED AS BEING UP TO THREE THOUSAND ON SEVERAL WEB PAGES BUT I AM WILLING TO ACCEPT IT MAY BE LESS.


‘Facts’ about UK Muslims are mostly wrong
Click to expand...

THE MAYOR OF LONDON IS HAVING STREET NAMES CHANGED, AND STATUES TAKEN DOWN BECAUSE THEY ARE OFFENSIVE TO MUSLIMS. HE ALSO APPEARS TO BE DELIBERATELY INSULTING THE BRITISH PEOPLE BY THINGS LIKE HAVING A STATUE PUT UP TO COMMEMORATE BLACK SLAVES TAKEN BY BRITAIN.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Now, can we get back to discussing the unholy Quran? No of course we can't because you have not read it. And you are calling me ignorant.
 
Last edited:
Scorpion said:
Oh yea! Do you want to go toe to toe with me dismantling the meaning of the Quran verse by verse? I read the Quran all through twice 20 years ago, and constantly refer to it reading verses to refresh my mind.

I can tell you the meaning of the Quran in a sentence.

It says obey Allah and the messenger.
Click to expand...
Jesus and Mo did it better.

Scorpion said:
I do not give a damn what is says in the bible and I don't suppose Robert Spence does either. because Christians and Jews do not want to take over the world.
Click to expand...
You really are out of tough with reality.

Scorpion said:
The London mayor is trying to erase our culture and import more Muslims.
There are many cities in England now with Muslim mayors. If you want I can give you a list. Now Humza Yousaf is taking over Scotland.
Click to expand...
OK, now you're descending to xenophobic conspiracy rantings.
 
catsmate said:
Jesus and Mo did it better.
You really are out of tough with reality.
OK, now you're descending to xenophobic conspiracy rantings.
Click to expand...

So! Is anyone going to actually discuss the Quran here. Or are you all just going to keep talking a lot of trash?
 
Scorpion said:
Oh yea! Do you want to go toe to toe with me dismantling the meaning of the Quran verse by verse? I read the Quran all through twice 20 years ago, and constantly refer to it reading verses to refresh my mind.

I can tell you the meaning of the Quran in a sentence.

It says obey Allah and the messenger.

It says this many times through out the Quran. That means obey Muhammad. Fight for him and die for him and give him one fifth of the spoils of war, or you will burn in hellfire forever.

I do not give a damn what is says in the bible and I don't suppose Robert Spence does either. because Christians and Jews do not want to take over the world. But it is the stated aim of many Muslims and they are doing it right now. I believe countries like Iran and Saudi Arabia are funding the invasion of Britain by paying young men to come here claiming to be refugees. Saudi Arabia also funds the building of mosques, and there are estimated to be up to three thousand mosques in Britain today.
The London mayor is trying to erase our culture and import more Muslims.
There are many cities in England now with Muslim mayors. If you want I can give you a list. Now Humza Yousaf is taking over Scotland.
Click to expand...
It must be interesting to live in your head. I am a Scot, living in Scitland, and just because Humza won a party election to become First Minister I am not worried I'll be waking up in a theocratic Muslim state anytime soon. In fact one of the reasons he won (just) was that his main challenger was a Wee Free Church Christian who thought children born out of wedlock were a problem. I'm much more worried about that given the minority of people who are religious in Scotland are predominantly Christian.
 
Parsman said:
It must be interesting to live in your head. I am a Scot, living in Scitland, and just because Humza won a party election to become First Minister I am not worried I'll be waking up in a theocratic Muslim state anytime soon. In fact one of the reasons he won (just) was that his main challenger was a Wee Free Church Christian who thought children born out of wedlock were a problem. I'm much more worried about that given the minority of people who are religious in Scotland are predominantly Christian.
Click to expand...

Don't worry, Humza will fix the problem of children. he is committed to allowing abortion for any reason including sex discrimination, right up to full term before birth.

He also began his appointment with a speech complaining that all the people in charge in Scotland are white.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom