Stormy Daniels Sues the President

Status
Not open for further replies.
Possibly so. The unwashed Trump masses don't believe anything the MSM says but pictures are easy to understand. "Gollly, gee whiz, he was boinking a hooker. What a scuzzbucket"

There is a good chance that the material Clifford and others have are very unflattering for Trump. For example, it is frequently the case that people in positions of power prefer submissive roles in the bedroom. Signs of erectile disfunction might also cause Trump to lose Cred with his homies.

If the material showed Trump as a stud banging a hot porn star, Trump wouldn't work so hard to suppress it: after all, he used leak stories of his supposed affairs himself under a psydonyme.
 
Last edited:
If the material showed Trump as a stud banging a hot porn star, Trump wouldn't work so hard to suppress it: after all, he used leak stories of his supposed affairs himself under a psydonyme.

IMO there's a big difference between promulgating stories of one's affairs and actually allowing video evidence of same - regardless of how proficient one may have been - to appear in the public domain. I for one would not want a freeze-frame of my "completion face" splashed across the front pages.
 
Busy Stormy Daniels news day. She and her lawyer seem to be much better at this game than Trump and co.

http://www.msnbc.com/morning-joe/wa...-physically-1187514947648?playlist=associated

Stormy Daniels' attorney Michael Avenatti joins Morning Joe to discuss the latest details in the lawsuit against the president, more women who have come forward with stories of the president and why he says Daniels was threatened physically.

http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-brief...ve-come-forward-to-stormy-daniels-lawyer-with

Stormy Daniels' lawyer said on Thursday that he has been approached by six other women with stories about President Trump similar to that of the adult-film actress.

Michael Avenatti cautioned in an appearance on CNN that he had not yet vetted the cases "to any great degree," but said that at least two of the women have non-disclosure agreements.
...
"The initial consultations, the initial information that we're receiving indicates that there are some striking similarities between their stories and that of my client, Ms. Clifford," Avenatti said.


https://www.nytimes.com/2018/03/15/...&gwh=B366C411561C52AB86B0F44D42E42B60&gwt=pay

The CBS News program “60 Minutes” has set a date of March 25 for when it will show a recently conducted interview with the pornographic film actress who says she had an affair with Donald J. Trump.

More nothingburgers. No one cares, no one is bankrolling her, the Edwards precedent, blah blah blah....
 
Last edited:
There is a good chance that the material Clifford and others have are very unflattering for Trump. For example, it is frequently the case that people in positions of power prefer submissive roles in the bedroom. Signs of erectile disfunction might also cause Trump to lose Cred with his homies.

If the material showed Trump as a stud banging a hot porn star, Trump wouldn't work so hard to suppress it: after all, he used leak stories of his supposed affairs himself under a psydonyme.

Strong implications from many sources that trumpf may be a urolagnic and at
a minimum likes to watch women doing such. (The Russian thing noted elsewhere in several trumpf threads in the forum.). Of course, Putin has similar problem with his clear love of Tom of Finland poses.
 
Busy Stormy Daniels news day. She and her lawyer seem to be much better at this game than Trump and co.

http://www.msnbc.com/morning-joe/wa...-physically-1187514947648?playlist=associated

Stormy Daniels' attorney Michael Avenatti joins Morning Joe to discuss the latest details in the lawsuit against the president, more women who have come forward with stories of the president and why he says Daniels was threatened physically.

http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-brief...ve-come-forward-to-stormy-daniels-lawyer-with

Stormy Daniels' lawyer said on Thursday that he has been approached by six other women with stories about President Trump similar to that of the adult-film actress.

Michael Avenatti cautioned in an appearance on CNN that he had not yet vetted the cases "to any great degree," but said that at least two of the women have non-disclosure agreements.
...
"The initial consultations, the initial information that we're receiving indicates that there are some striking similarities between their stories and that of my client, Ms. Clifford," Avenatti said.


https://www.nytimes.com/2018/03/15/...&gwh=B366C411561C52AB86B0F44D42E42B60&gwt=pay

The CBS News program “60 Minutes” has set a date of March 25 for when it will show a recently conducted interview with the pornographic film actress who says she had an affair with Donald J. Trump.

More nothingburgers. No one cares, no one is bankrolling her, the Edwards precedent, blah blah blah....

Makes good sense!!! She has an actual working brain!!!
 
Busy Stormy Daniels news day. She and her lawyer seem to be much better at this game than Trump and co.

http://www.msnbc.com/morning-joe/wa...-physically-1187514947648?playlist=associated

Stormy Daniels' attorney Michael Avenatti joins Morning Joe to discuss the latest details in the lawsuit against the president, more women who have come forward with stories of the president and why he says Daniels was threatened physically.

http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-brief...ve-come-forward-to-stormy-daniels-lawyer-with

Stormy Daniels' lawyer said on Thursday that he has been approached by six other women with stories about President Trump similar to that of the adult-film actress.

Michael Avenatti cautioned in an appearance on CNN that he had not yet vetted the cases "to any great degree," but said that at least two of the women have non-disclosure agreements.
...
"The initial consultations, the initial information that we're receiving indicates that there are some striking similarities between their stories and that of my client, Ms. Clifford," Avenatti said.


https://www.nytimes.com/2018/03/15/...&gwh=B366C411561C52AB86B0F44D42E42B60&gwt=pay

The CBS News program “60 Minutes” has set a date of March 25 for when it will show a recently conducted interview with the pornographic film actress who says she had an affair with Donald J. Trump.

More nothingburgers. No one cares, no one is bankrolling her, the Edwards precedent, blah blah blah....

This is just the Trump way of 'Making America Great Again'.
 
Busy Stormy Daniels news day. She and her lawyer seem to be much better at this game than Trump and co.

http://www.msnbc.com/morning-joe/wa...-physically-1187514947648?playlist=associated

Stormy Daniels' attorney Michael Avenatti joins Morning Joe to discuss the latest details in the lawsuit against the president, more women who have come forward with stories of the president and why he says Daniels was threatened physically.

http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-brief...ve-come-forward-to-stormy-daniels-lawyer-with

Stormy Daniels' lawyer said on Thursday that he has been approached by six other women with stories about President Trump similar to that of the adult-film actress.

Michael Avenatti cautioned in an appearance on CNN that he had not yet vetted the cases "to any great degree," but said that at least two of the women have non-disclosure agreements.
...
"The initial consultations, the initial information that we're receiving indicates that there are some striking similarities between their stories and that of my client, Ms. Clifford," Avenatti said.


https://www.nytimes.com/2018/03/15/...&gwh=B366C411561C52AB86B0F44D42E42B60&gwt=pay

The CBS News program “60 Minutes” has set a date of March 25 for when it will show a recently conducted interview with the pornographic film actress who says she had an affair with Donald J. Trump.

More nothingburgers. No one cares, no one is bankrolling her, the Edwards precedent, blah blah blah....

With the increasing media pressure, Trump and Co will probably have to make a move soon.
 
With the increasing media pressure, Trump and Co will probably have to make a move soon.

The fact that Stormy's lawyer running his mouth isn't all that big of a deal, of course.

She was physically threatened? How? "In an interview with MSNBC’s "Morning Joe," Michael Avenatti, an attorney for Daniels, repeatedly said that his client had been threatened, but wouldn’t say by who. He also declined to give details on the nature of the threats."

'k.

TBD, putting the Skeptic in International Skeptics Forum.
 
The fact that Stormy's lawyer running his mouth isn't all that big of a deal, of course.

She was physically threatened? How? "In an interview with MSNBC’s "Morning Joe," Michael Avenatti, an attorney for Daniels, repeatedly said that his client had been threatened, but wouldn’t say by who. He also declined to give details on the nature of the threats."

'k.

TBD, putting the Skeptic in International Skeptics Forum.

IOW, you got nothing.

...

Of course, Avenatti also said that it would all be made clear in the interview coming up in a week and half.

Right out of the Trump playbook.

4D Tic-Tac-Toe

'k :thumbsup:
 
Golly, that is the first i heard of that! I just googled it and found nothing. Do you have a link?

Golly you need to work on your google skills !

http://www.businessinsider.com/donald-trump-lawyer-michael-cohen-wife-ivana-2015-7

I will make sure that you and I meet one day while we're in the courthouse. And I will take you for every penny you still don't have. And I will come after your Daily Beast and everybody else that you possibly know," Cohen said. "So I'm warning you, tread very *********** lightly, because what I'm going to do to you is going to be *********** disgusting. You understand me?"

"You write a story that has Mr. Trump's name in it, with the word rape, and I'm going to mess your life up … for as long as you're on this frickin' planet … you're going to have judgments against you, so much money, you'll never know how to get out from underneath it," he added.

...

"Though there's many literal senses to the word, if you distort it, and you put Mr. Trump's name there onto it, rest assured, you will suffer the consequences. So you do whatever you want. You want to ruin your life at the age of 20? You do that, and I'll be happy to serve it right up to you," he added.


You think Cohen sounds like a quality guy or an *******, TBD ?
 
Last edited:
Nobody knows why Stormy didn't call the police when she was physically threatened?

Nobody on this board, you mean ? I'm guessing she knows.

Do you want people to guess ?

Maybe the same reason abused women don't immediately go to the police?
Maybe the same reason people being shaken down by other people don't immediately go to the police?
 
And once again it is a case of it's not the original offense that gets you into big trouble, but the cover up.
 
Is it just me that hates this? Trump is the least competent most corrupt President in history and has no business being President. He is violating the emoluments clause daily. He doesn't read and gets all his info from Fox and Friends and has appointed the least capable cabinet in history...Turns over his staff like a McDonald's employee turning burgers. Yet what looks like the only thing that gets traction is his boinking porn stars?

I want this turd of a human being out of the White House yesterday but I want it to be because he's corrupt and pathetic liar. Not because he sleeps around on his wife.
 
Yet what looks like the only thing that gets traction is his boinking porn stars?

I've seen statements from people who have professional experience doing investigations and building cases for the FBI, and they've said that for an investigation as wide-reaching and complex as the one Mueller is pursuing that all the signs are he's moving quickly. There's plenty of traction there, we just have to wait and let the man do his job. The only people who have anything to gain by Trump half-arsing it is anybody who would be convicted of something otherwise.
 
IOW, you got nothing.

:

BINGO my man!

"In an interview with MSNBC’s "Morning Joe," Michael Avenatti, an attorney for Daniels, repeatedly said that his client had been threatened, but wouldn’t say by who. He also declined to give details on the nature of the threats."

That is indeed legit *********** nothing.

You and I are absolutely a great team.

:thumbsup::thumbsup::thumbsup::thumbsup::thumbsup::thumbsup::thumbsup:
 
Is it just me that hates this? Trump is the least competent most corrupt President in history and has no business being President. He is violating the emoluments clause daily. He doesn't read and gets all his info from Fox and Friends and has appointed the least capable cabinet in history...Turns over his staff like a McDonald's employee turning burgers. Yet what looks like the only thing that gets traction is his boinking porn stars?

I want this turd of a human being out of the White House yesterday but I want it to be because he's corrupt and pathetic liar. Not because he sleeps around on his wife.

I'm all in favor of anything that embarrasses him and distracts him from his campaign of destroying my country.
 
BINGO my man!

"In an interview with MSNBC’s "Morning Joe," Michael Avenatti, an attorney for Daniels, repeatedly said that his client had been threatened, but wouldn’t say by who. He also declined to give details on the nature of the threats."

That is indeed legit *********** nothing.

You and I are absolutely a great team.

:thumbsup::thumbsup::thumbsup::thumbsup::thumbsup::thumbsup::thumbsup:

:dl:

Refusing to provide evidence on morning joe = got nothing.
 
There is one thing coming up that Trump dreads more than anything else:
Stormy Daniels' 60min interview TV-ratings.
The more people watch this, the more it will enrage Trump because in his mind there is no relevant difference between the truth and what a majority watches on TV.
 
Is it just me that hates this? Trump is the least competent most corrupt President in history and has no business being President. He is violating the emoluments clause daily. He doesn't read and gets all his info from Fox and Friends and has appointed the least capable cabinet in history...Turns over his staff like a McDonald's employee turning burgers. Yet what looks like the only thing that gets traction is his boinking porn stars?

I want this turd of a human being out of the White House yesterday but I want it to be because he's corrupt and pathetic liar. Not because he sleeps around on his wife.

It is not his bonking the porn star but that the way the payments were made might have been illegal and the way he is lying about it is the issue....

And, frankly, if this is what brings him down, fine with me as long as he is brought down. Call it the "Al Capone" scenario:they could not nail him for the many murders he ordered, but they could for tax evasion..and it was the end of Al Capone.
 
I'm all in favor of anything that embarrasses him and distracts him from his campaign of destroying my country.

And I repeat my Al Capone comparasion.
I just don't get this kind of ideological purity on either side of the spectrum.
 
There is one thing coming up that Trump dreads more than anything else:
Stormy Daniels' 60min interview TV-ratings.
The more people watch this, the more it will enrage Trump because in his mind there is no relevant difference between the truth and what a majority watches on TV.

I will certainly work to up the numbers on that!!!!! I want him to be televised watching it just to see him burst one or more arteries/heart chambers!!!
 
Is it just me that hates this? Trump is the least competent most corrupt President in history and has no business being President. He is violating the emoluments clause daily. He doesn't read and gets all his info from Fox and Friends and has appointed the least capable cabinet in history...Turns over his staff like a McDonald's employee turning burgers. Yet what looks like the only thing that gets traction is his boinking porn stars?

I want this turd of a human being out of the White House yesterday but I want it to be because he's corrupt and pathetic liar. Not because he sleeps around on his wife.

Calling it a turd is way too kind for that pile of fecal matter!!!!!
 
More likely "he's boinking a porn star - what a hero" :(

Gross, that isn't my personal take on it.

I don't think photos of him doin' it doggy style will matter either. Too little too late.

People are complaining about Russian collusion, accusing him of being a racist misogynistic crazy man with the nuclear button, yet an affair from years ago is going to matter? It will not.

The campaign finance angle will fail too and the Dems will have yet another failed attempt to take down Trump on their resumes.

I think all the accusations over the past couple of years that have led to nothing have only strengthened people's defense of Trump. I think he's being martyred in a way. "You're picking on him", sour grapes, yada yada.

To go after a sitting president in this manner and at this point undermines everything Dems think they are achieving. They may appease the rabid Trump haters but they are ultimately just hurting themselves.

It's pathetic at this point and very obvious. Dems have tried numerous times and failed. It's actually getting weird.
 
Democrats are steering clear of the Trump/Clifford situation as much as possible.
This is fine, since there is nothing they can do to help but a lot of possible harm in trying.
 
Gross, that isn't my personal take on it.

I don't think photos of him doin' it doggy style will matter either. Too little too late.

People are complaining about Russian collusion, accusing him of being a racist misogynistic crazy man with the nuclear button, yet an affair from years ago is going to matter? It will not.

The campaign finance angle will fail too and the Dems will have yet another failed attempt to take down Trump on their resumes.

I think all the accusations over the past couple of years that have led to nothing have only strengthened people's defense of Trump. I think he's being martyred in a way. "You're picking on him", sour grapes, yada yada.

To go after a sitting president in this manner and at this point undermines everything Dems think they are achieving. They may appease the rabid Trump haters but they are ultimately just hurting themselves.

It's pathetic at this point and very obvious. Dems have tried numerous times and failed. It's actually getting weird.

I give you the true believer folks.
The kind of supporter that Trump boasted about in his infamous "I could shoot a guy in Times Square: statement.

Wonder if he gets his news from any source other then Fox and Friends.
And the Democrats wish they had as much power as you give them.....
 
Last edited:
Ruh roh.

The lawyer representing the adult film star Stormy Daniels alleges that some of the accusations she's making against President Donald Trump occurred while Trump was in office.

"Is there anything in the litany of accusations -- you would call them facts -- that surround this case that happened while Donald Trump was President?" CNN's Jake Tapper asked Michael Avenatti, Daniels' lawyer, during an interview Friday.

"Yes," Avenatti replied.

When asked by Tapper if he could elaborate, Avenatti gave a simple "no."
 
Gross, that isn't my personal take on it.

I don't think photos of him doin' it doggy style will matter either. Too little too late.

People are complaining about Russian collusion, accusing him of being a racist misogynistic crazy man with the nuclear button, yet an affair from years ago is going to matter? It will not.

The campaign finance angle will fail too and the Dems will have yet another failed attempt to take down Trump on their resumes.

I think all the accusations over the past couple of years that have led to nothing have only strengthened people's defense of Trump. I think he's being martyred in a way. "You're picking on him", sour grapes, yada yada.

To go after a sitting president in this manner and at this point undermines everything Dems think they are achieving. They may appease the rabid Trump haters but they are ultimately just hurting themselves.

It's pathetic at this point and very obvious. Dems have tried numerous times and failed. It's actually getting weird.

We will see. BTW, I haven't heard Democratic politicians talking about Stormy Daniels at all. This is just the media running a juicy story. And the Democrats don't need a porn star to take Trump down. He does it every time he opens his mouth. The man is an idiot of major proportions with a scumbag character. Never in my life have I seen a sleazier politician and that is saying something. I'd say, a sleazier human being but unfortunately I've met a few who just might be a tad sleazier. The man cheats, lies, steals and is undermining American democracy. He should be hung for his traitorous acts.

Get ready for a mid term bloodbath.
 
Gross, that isn't my personal take on it.

I don't think photos of him doin' it doggy style will matter either. Too little too late.

People are complaining about Russian collusion, accusing him of being a racist misogynistic crazy man with the nuclear button, yet an affair from years ago is going to matter? It will not.

The campaign finance angle will fail too and the Dems will have yet another failed attempt to take down Trump on their resumes.

I think all the accusations over the past couple of years that have led to nothing have only strengthened people's defense of Trump. I think he's being martyred in a way. "You're picking on him", sour grapes, yada yada.

To go after a sitting president in this manner and at this point undermines everything Dems think they are achieving. They may appease the rabid Trump haters but they are ultimately just hurting themselves.

It's pathetic at this point and very obvious. Dems have tried numerous times and failed. It's actually getting weird.

A couple of obvious questions.

First, you're totally okay with a payoff just prior to election in order to get an NDA from a porn star? I mean, no big deal one way or the other, I guess, but it's not really spotless behavior. But you're good with it, are you?

Second, why do you keep blaming the Democrats for this particular scandal? Which Dems are keeping it in the news? Seems to me to be a salacious bit of news, kept in the public eye by the media itself.

You've repeatedly talked about how the Dems have behaved badly in this event. Please, tell us who and when. Thanks.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom