• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Simon Shack says that Youtube has shut him down

Scott Sommers

Illuminator
Scott Sommers
Joined
Jul 27, 2009
Messages
3,866
This was posted on the September Clues Facebook group.

Via Simon Shack
"My entire Youtube channel (which contained a decade of hard work, with more than 20 videos exposing the 9/11 deception) was closed down by the Youtube censors today. Why? I don't know. If you are curious, you may read about it here: http://cluesforum.info/viewtopic.php… However, here is my new Youtube channel, where I will slowly be re-uploading all of my 9/11 video research: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cF0-nslm3j0 Please diffuse it far and wide, my lovely friends."
Click to expand...
 
Last edited:
As far as I'm concerned, great. Blah blah blah free speech blah blah blah. Excising a cancerous blob of idiocy and stupidity from your body - or society - is always a good thing.
 
Last edited:
Youtube has been deleting many accounts, mostly ones dealing with 'fake' mass shootings, but as I have noticed before, believe in one conspiracy and they likely believe them all
(and yes simple simon has a whole section of the 'no bloody clue' forum dealing with- you guessed it- all mass shootings are fake...)

examples of his forums topics are:
VICSIMS: the simulated victims of 9/11
London, Madrid, Oslo and other faked terror events: the psyops are everywhere

along with geocentralism, fake moon landings, volcanos are fake (???), nukes are fake and the beat goes on...
 
Dabop said:
Youtube has been deleting many accounts, mostly ones dealing with 'fake' mass shootings, but as I have noticed before, believe in one conspiracy and they likely believe them all(and yes simple simon has a whole section of the 'no bloody clue' forum dealing with- you guessed it- all mass shootings are fake...)

examples of his forums topics are:
VICSIMS: the simulated victims of 9/11
London, Madrid, Oslo and other faked terror events: the psyops are everywhere

along with geocentralism, fake moon landings, volcanos are fake (???), nukes are fake and the beat goes on...
Click to expand...

This seems to be scarily consistent. If you disagree, the common retort is "Oh, you believe everything the GOVERNMENT tells you!"

No, I don't believe you.
 
It is like there is something in the brain of a conspiracy believe that simply isnt wired right, that the more outlandish the belief, the more likely they are to believe in it
 
Dabop said:
It is like there is something in the brain of a conspiracy believe that simply isnt wired right, that the more outlandish the belief, the more likely they are to believe in it
Click to expand...

A sense of community, I think. "We see what the SHEEPLE don't!"

Of course, that breaks down when they argue about their own pet hypotheses.
 
Dabop said:
Youtube has been deleting many accounts, mostly ones dealing with 'fake' mass shootings, but as I have noticed before, believe in one conspiracy and they likely believe them all
(and yes simple simon has a whole section of the 'no bloody clue' forum dealing with- you guessed it- all mass shootings are fake...)

examples of his forums topics are:
VICSIMS: the simulated victims of 9/11
London, Madrid, Oslo and other faked terror events: the psyops are everywhere

along with geocentralism, fake moon landings, volcanos are fake (???), nukes are fake and the beat goes on...
Click to expand...

One of the friends of We Are Change that I used to talk with, Harry Link, has been banned from Facebook for posting that the Parkland shooting never happened.

I guess Youtube and Facebook have finally realized that they're private property and not everybody has the right to post any nonsense that they want.
 
332nd said:
Wait... Volcanoes are fake?... Why?
Click to expand...


Probably because the existence of volcanoes supports the non-flat earth hypothesis. Where else would the lava come from?



CORed said:
If volcanoes are fake, I wonder what put that thin layer of dust on my windshield in May of 1981.
Click to expand...


Oh, that's easy; the pixies. Haven't you ever heard of pixie dust?
 
Horatius said:
Probably because the existence of volcanoes supports the non-flat earth hypothesis. Where else would the lava come from?






Oh, that's easy; the pixies. Haven't you ever heard of pixie dust?
Click to expand...

One of the questions the flat earthers have never really addressed is how thick is the flat earth, and what happens if you dig or drill all the way through it. Seems oil and gas drilling could be really dangerous. If you go all the way through, will all the air leak out the bottom?
 
CORed said:
One of the questions the flat earthers have never really addressed is how thick is the flat earth, and what happens if you dig or drill all the way through it. Seems oil and gas drilling could be really dangerous. If you go all the way through, will all the air leak out the bottom?
Click to expand...

Of course not. It's hot air all the way down!
 
He made that post on 8 March. He said he was going to upload all of his videos, but so far he has only done one which has got 583 views. LOL.
 
Dabop said:
It is like there is something in the brain of a conspiracy believe that simply isnt wired right, that the more outlandish the belief, the more likely they are to believe in it
Click to expand...
True, because they are special little snowflakes! AKA: ********!!!
 
Scott Sommers said:
One of the friends of We Are Change that I used to talk with, Harry Link, has been banned from Facebook for posting that the Parkland shooting never happened.

I guess Youtube and Facebook have finally realized that they're private property and not everybody has the right to post any nonsense that they want.
Click to expand...

Good for them! Idiots have a right to free expression but no one can be forced to publish their tirds of whizzdom!!!!!
 
Even though I am extreme left, I have a soft spot for freedom of speech. And as someone who researches obscure stuff a lot, it's unfortunate that some videos that did have real useful information could have been lost forever. It's a moral principal I hold, not just a law that I acknowledge does not exist to protect content hosted on private websites. I think The U.S. Government should rule Google/Youtube as the digital equivalent of a public space and force them to institute polices promoting transparency and freedom of speech. That or shut down business in the U.S.

It's the freedom of millions versus the freedom of a few butthurt businessmen in suits.

BTW I do not believe in what most could call "crisis actor conspiracy theories", but the most harmful and known case of real crisis actors were the people appearing on media and falsely claiming to have Intelligence sources proving Iraq supports terrorism and hides WMDs. Today in 2018 it is a known historical fact that the Iraq War was a pointless mass-murder which was started over false pretenses by in part by the criminal George W. Bush. Before 2006 when the Manning memo was released, this was considered a conspiracy theory. The fact that the Iraq war happened is way worse than if 9/11 was an inside job. So no, I do not personally fault people too much for becoming paranoid about media reports being staged so a massive extent.
 
Last edited:
So not on Facebook. Isn't there some other platform they can download their crapulence for public consumption? Something based in Bulgaria or Russia, which can't be touched by The Zook?
 
Norman Alexander said:
So not on Facebook. Isn't there some other platform they can download their crapulence for public consumption? Something based in Bulgaria or Russia, which can't be touched by The Zook?
Click to expand...

I wish there was a Russian Youtube that allowed literally everything with the possible exception of hardcore child pornography.
 
MicahJava said:
I think The U.S. Government should rule Google/Youtube as the digital equivalent of a public space and force them to institute polices promoting transparency and freedom of speech. That or shut down business in the U.S.
Click to expand...


Any government takeover of a space owned by a private business would be the opposite of freedom of speech.

The public space you're looking for is the internet itself, which is open to any woomeister who wants to make their nonsense available for public viewing. They can create their own web site on self-owned or rented servers and spew to their heart's content.
 
So there is actually nothing preventing Simon Shack from posting his silly blither publicly. It just seems he is miffed that FaceBook isn't going to let him use them any more.

Poor darling.
 
Since Simon bans everybody on Cluesforum who do not agree with him 100%, I consider this poetic justice.

Norm
 
MicahJava said:
I wish there was a Russian Youtube that allowed literally everything with the possible exception of hardcore child pornography.
Click to expand...

Except of course anything critical of Putin, his government or its policies and actions. Can't have that.
 
MicahJava said:
...it is a known historical fact that...
Click to expand...

I love it when a Truther or liberal/leftist/progressive/socialist/moron/anyone uses the “known historical fact” line. It immediately shows whatever follows can be discounted completely out of hand and can - and indeed, should - be mocked and belittled unceasingly throughout time.
 
gerdbonk said:
Any government takeover of a space owned by a private business would be the opposite of freedom of speech.

The public space you're looking for is the internet itself, which is open to any woomeister who wants to make their nonsense available for public viewing. They can create their own web site on self-owned or rented servers and spew to their heart's content.
Click to expand...

Like I said, the freedom of a few shills in suits versus the freedom of millions. Imagine if the U.S. Government instituted freedom of speech as hard as China institutes censorship.
 
Pinch said:
I love it when a Truther or liberal/leftist/progressive/socialist/moron/anyone uses the “known historical fact” line. It immediately shows whatever follows can be discounted completely out of hand and can - and indeed, should - be mocked and belittled unceasingly throughout time.
Click to expand...

Anybody who can read knows that Iraq was a phony war and everybody died for nothing. Can you read the Manning memo? Bush was insane.
 
MicahJava said:
Like I said, the freedom of a few shills in suits versus the freedom of millions. Imagine if the U.S. Government instituted freedom of speech as hard as China institutes censorship.
Click to expand...

China's censorship is pretty easy to get around. As for Russia, of course they attempt to censor the internet and abuse the laws they have in place. Just look it up on the internet.
 
MicahJava said:
Like I said, the freedom of a few shills in suits versus the freedom of millions. Imagine if the U.S. Government instituted freedom of speech as hard as China institutes censorship.
Click to expand...

YouTube and its parent companies have about 89,000 employees, and I doubt any of them wear suits.

Although you Governmental Regulation in the name of teh "FREEDOM" is intriguing, do you think that they should use Gestapo like tactics to force YouTube to seve as a forum for literally the dumbest ************ on the planet, Simon Shack?
 
MicahJava said:
I wish there was a Russian Youtube that allowed literally everything with the possible exception of hardcore child pornography.
Click to expand...
EyebrowRaisedEmoji.jpg
 
Last edited:
The Big Dog said:
YouTube and its parent companies have about 89,000 employees, and I doubt any of them wear suits.

Although you Governmental Regulation in the name of teh "FREEDOM" is intriguing, do you think that they should use Gestapo like tactics to force YouTube to seve as a forum for literally the dumbest ************ on the planet, Simon Shack?
Click to expand...

I think Google as a company should be forced to give up a little bit of it's freedom to benefit the freedom of speech for millions of Americans. Either that or get your business out of the U.S.

What are the advertisers gonna do? fault Google for following the laws? So the butthurt businessmen scenario is an exaggeration, I think everybody would get the hell over it just fine if freedom of speech was enforced as hard as censorship is enforced in other places.
 
JesseCuster said:
[qimg]https://www.emojirequest.com/images/EyebrowRaisedEmoji.jpg[/qimg]
Click to expand...

I say "hardcore" because I am definitely not a fan of the ridiculous technicalities in the age of consent laws that place perfectly decent people in jail or legal trouble. I believe that the age of consent should be 16, sexting shouldn't be illegal, 14 can be with 18, 15 can be with 19, and everybody in America just needs to simmer the hell down on sexual issues. Obviously we need to get away from the days of marrying children, but I think we're overcompensating a bit when perfectly innocent lives are being damaged. BTW, at the age of sixteen, I sort of had a fetish for sharing NSFW pictures of myself with anonymous people over at the reddit malejailbait section before it got shut down over threats and PR pressure. Like Youtube, reddit was once advertised as a safe haven for free speech. FYI I am now happily married to someone my age.
 
Last edited:
MicahJava said:
I think Google as a company should be forced to give up a little bit of it's freedom to benefit the freedom of speech for millions of Americans. Either that or get your business out of the U.S.
Click to expand...

well fortunately we have not totally rescinded the First Amendment which prevents the government from seizing private property and turning it over to idiots like Simon Shake
 
losing ones conspiracy source material is always teh sadz.
 
MicahJava said:
I say "hardcore" because I am definitely not a fan of the ridiculous technicalities in the age of consent laws that place perfectly decent people in jail or legal trouble. I believe that the age of consent should be 16, sexting shouldn't be illegal, 14 can be with 18, 15 can be with 19, and everybody in America just needs to simmer the hell down on sexual issues. Obviously we need to get away from the days of marrying children, but I think we're overcompensating a bit when perfectly innocent lives are being damaged. BTW, at the age of sixteen, I sort of had a fetish for sharing NSFW pictures of myself with anonymous people over at the reddit malejailbait section before it got shut down over threats and PR pressure. Like Youtube, reddit was once advertised as a safe haven for free speech. FYI I am now happily married to someone my age.
Click to expand...

This is the only thing you've ever said that I agree with, though you worded it terribly at first as "non hardcore child porn". keep in mind that laws are in place to protect a huge range of individuals, so though you cannot move the consent laws, sex education is certainly necessary, and as open and honestly as possible so we can get rid of some draconian laws. I was much, much younger than 16 when I noticed things.

Okay back on topic, cause I don't wanna go off the rails here.
Russian based site....careful what you wish for.
 
Last edited:
fuelair said:
Good for them! Idiots have a right to free expression but no one can be forced to publish their tirds of whizzdom!!!!!
Click to expand...

Exactly, YouTube is a private company, and they have a perfect right to determin what they will and what they will not host.
And setting up your own private internet video channel is not that difficult or that expensive.
 
dudalb said:
Exactly, YouTube is a private company, and they have a perfect right to determin what they will and what they will not host.
And setting up your own private internet video channel is not that difficult or that expensive.
Click to expand...

No one company should have all that power.
 
MicahJava said:
No one company should have all that power.
Click to expand...

They should have the power to run their business to their established reasonable standards. Like the man said, not hard to set up a private channel. Don't need Youtube.
 
MicahJava said:
No one company should have all that power.
Click to expand...


No one company does have that power. There are other streaming sites out there that can host videos, and if they all shut you out, you can start your own company. Isn't that exactly what Alex Jones did with his Infowars site?

Freedom doesn't have to equal easy, or cheap. If you're too lazy to do the work needed to get your message out, then that's on you.
 
MicahJava said:
No one company should have all that power.
Click to expand...

What???? do you know you can start a web page, buy a *U&)*>.com URL and publish all the lies you want, and expose the overwhelming ignorance of 9/11 truth. power... are you upset failed claims and lies are banished due to their complete and utter ignorance?

Power? Child what?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom