ISF Logo   IS Forum
Forum Index Register Members List Events Mark Forums Read Help

Go Back   International Skeptics Forum » General Topics » Science, Mathematics, Medicine, and Technology
 


Welcome to the International Skeptics Forum, where we discuss skepticism, critical thinking, the paranormal and science in a friendly but lively way. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest, which means you are missing out on discussing matters that are of interest to you. Please consider registering so you can gain full use of the forum features and interact with other Members. Registration is simple, fast and free! Click here to register today.
Reply
Old 25th April 2018, 02:40 PM   #3961
Reality Check
Penultimate Amazing
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 22,328
Thumbs down An insane video sparked by a word in Dan Brown's book

Originally Posted by Pixie of key View Post
Do you know Alex Cannon?
An insane video sparked by a word in Dan Brown's book.
  1. The insanity of Dan Brown, who is a thriller writer not a science writer.
  2. "one word" entropy!
  3. Usual lies about cosmology.
  4. A "cooling space" delusion?.
  5. The usual "cannot explain" lie.
  6. A lie that ignorant delusions explain anything.
  7. Alex Cannon?
Finnish physics crackpot with no known mathematical ability, little knowledge of physics shown, lots of hand waving and some primitive videos and
lies about science being a religion,
a lie of no observations for expanding space ,
an irrational demand for the impossible direct measurement of the curvature of spacetime,
a lie that pulling forces have not been measured,
repeated idiocy of quoting obviously deluded and irrelevant comments on blogs,
ignorant delusion that gravity does not have an inverse square law,
a total delusion that supermassive black holes emit dark matter,
a repeated lie that Stephen Hawking did not understand basic physics (gravity ),
a lie that people here have not explained expanding spacetime to him,
repeatedly asks obviously deluded or answered questions to waste the time of other posters,
repeated lie that science articles are about his delusions,
a lie of space not curving when the tests of GR pass with curving spacetime.
a delusion that space must "radiate information" to detect expansion
a lie of a prediction for "Jupiter's red spot getting taller as it shrinks"
a "Jupiter great red spot get more stronger" lie when it has been shrinking
insanity that sunspots and Jupiter's red spot have the same cause
insanity of "expanding nucleus" gibberish explaining Venus' mysterious night side (weather!)
"atoms expanding" delusions about Jupiter's north pole
3 lies of explaining redshifts or gravitational lensing.
delusions about an expanding Saturn, etc.
insane gibberish about thunderstorms.
delusions about wounds healing
deluded, lying "For The Man from international SKEPTICS forum" video

+ An insane video sparked by a word in Dan Brown's book
Reality Check is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 25th April 2018, 02:44 PM   #3962
Reality Check
Penultimate Amazing
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 22,328
Thumbs down Usual lies about science - this article is about groups of galaxies, not a galaxy

Originally Posted by Pixie of key View Post
"But, the fact that this is happening so early in the history of the universe poses a formidable challenge to our present-day understanding of the way structures form in the universe," he said."

https://m.phys.org/news/2018-04-astr...egamerger.html

"Current theory and computer models suggest that protoclusters as massive as the one observed by ALMA, however, should have taken much longer to evolve."

"How this assembly of galaxies got so big so fast is a bit of a mystery, it wasn't built up gradually over billions of years, as astronomers might expect," said Tim Miller, a doctoral candidate at Yale University and coauthor on the paper."
(emphasis added)
Usual lies about science - this article is about groups of galaxies, not a galaxy.

Finnish physics crackpot with no known mathematical ability, little knowledge of physics shown, lots of hand waving and some primitive videos and
lies about science being a religion,
a lie of no observations for expanding space ,
an irrational demand for the impossible direct measurement of the curvature of spacetime,
a lie that pulling forces have not been measured,
repeated idiocy of quoting obviously deluded and irrelevant comments on blogs,
ignorant delusion that gravity does not have an inverse square law,
a total delusion that supermassive black holes emit dark matter,
a repeated lie that Stephen Hawking did not understand basic physics (gravity ),
a lie that people here have not explained expanding spacetime to him,
repeatedly asks obviously deluded or answered questions to waste the time of other posters,
repeated lie that science articles are about his delusions,
a lie of space not curving when the tests of GR pass with curving spacetime.
a delusion that space must "radiate information" to detect expansion
a lie of a prediction for "Jupiter's red spot getting taller as it shrinks"
a "Jupiter great red spot get more stronger" lie when it has been shrinking
insanity that sunspots and Jupiter's red spot have the same cause
insanity of "expanding nucleus" gibberish explaining Venus' mysterious night side (weather!)
"atoms expanding" delusions about Jupiter's north pole
3 lies of explaining redshifts or gravitational lensing.
delusions about an expanding Saturn, etc.
insane gibberish about thunderstorms.
delusions about wounds healing
deluded, lying "For The Man from international SKEPTICS forum" video
An insane video sparked by a word in Dan Brown's book
Reality Check is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 25th April 2018, 07:53 PM   #3963
Pixie of key
Graduate Poster
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 1,939
"Solar flares, cosmic radiation, and the northern lights are well known phenomena. But exactly how their enormous energy arises is not as well understood. Now, physicists at Chalmers University of Technology, Sweden, have discovered a new way to study these spectacular space plasma phenomena in a laboratory environment. The results have been published in the renowned journal Nature Communications"

https://m.phys.org/news/2018-04-secr...res-earth.html

"But exactly how their enormous energy arises is not as well understood."


This is very good.

Usually this science people tell us that they already know and understund everything.

Like Syksy Räsänen, finish cosmology says that expansion of space is so certain that it is beyond reasonable doubt. He says so even though no one knows how to describe words, and visually what is on the expanding space when its metric coordinate system grows.

.
__________________
http://www.onesimpleprinciple.com/l4

"Math without words is meaningless.
Words without math can have meaning."
by Maartenn100
Pixie of key is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 25th April 2018, 08:20 PM   #3964
Reality Check
Penultimate Amazing
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 22,328
Thumbs down His "no one can explain expanding space in words or visually" lie

Originally Posted by Pixie of key View Post
"Solar flares, cosmic radiation, and the northern lights are well known phenomena. But exactly how their enormous energy arises is not as well understood. Now, physicists at Chalmers University of Technology, Sweden, have discovered a new way to study these spectacular space plasma phenomena in a laboratory environment. The results have been published in the renowned journal Nature Communications"

https://m.phys.org/news/2018-04-secr...res-earth.html

"But exactly how their enormous energy arises is not as well understood."
Irrelevant article used to lie about cosmology. The body of evidence is so great that "expansion of space is so certain that it is beyond reasonable doubt" is correct. It mostly takes unreasonable or ignorant or deluded people to doubt an expanding universe. There are a few scientists with reasonable doubts because they have studied cosmology and know what they are talking about.

At least 3 years of the "no one can explain expanding space in words or visually" lie when textbooks and Wikipedia articles do that.
1st October 2014 The Man: For explanation of and observational evidence for, see the metric expansion of space

Finnish physics crackpot with no known mathematical ability, little knowledge of physics shown, lots of hand waving and some primitive videos and
lies about science being a religion,
a lie of no observations for expanding space ,
an irrational demand for the impossible direct measurement of the curvature of spacetime,
a lie that pulling forces have not been measured,
repeated idiocy of quoting obviously deluded and irrelevant comments on blogs,
ignorant delusion that gravity does not have an inverse square law,
a total delusion that supermassive black holes emit dark matter,
a repeated lie that Stephen Hawking did not understand basic physics (gravity ),
a lie that people here have not explained expanding spacetime to him,
repeatedly asks obviously deluded or answered questions to waste the time of other posters,
repeated lie that science articles are about his delusions,
a lie of space not curving when the tests of GR pass with curving spacetime.
a delusion that space must "radiate information" to detect expansion
a lie of a prediction for "Jupiter's red spot getting taller as it shrinks"
a "Jupiter great red spot get more stronger" lie when it has been shrinking
insanity that sunspots and Jupiter's red spot have the same cause
insanity of "expanding nucleus" gibberish explaining Venus' mysterious night side (weather!)
"atoms expanding" delusions about Jupiter's north pole
3 lies of explaining redshifts or gravitational lensing.
delusions about an expanding Saturn, etc.
insane gibberish about thunderstorms.
delusions about wounds healing
deluded, lying "For The Man from international SKEPTICS forum" video
An insane video sparked by a word in Dan Brown's book

Last edited by Reality Check; 25th April 2018 at 08:30 PM.
Reality Check is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 29th April 2018, 04:58 AM   #3965
Sol88
Illuminator
 
Sol88's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 3,168
Originally Posted by Reality Check View Post
Irrelevant article used to lie about cosmology. The body of evidence is so great that "expansion of space is so certain that it is beyond reasonable doubt" is correct. It mostly takes unreasonable or ignorant or deluded people to doubt an expanding universe. There are a few scientists with reasonable doubts because they have studied cosmology and know what they are talking about.

At least 3 years of the "no one can explain expanding space in words or visually" lie when textbooks and Wikipedia articles do that.
1st October 2014 The Man: For explanation of and observational evidence for, see the metric expansion of space

Finnish physics crackpot with no known mathematical ability, little knowledge of physics shown, lots of hand waving and some primitive videos and
lies about science being a religion,
a lie of no observations for expanding space ,
an irrational demand for the impossible direct measurement of the curvature of spacetime,
a lie that pulling forces have not been measured,
repeated idiocy of quoting obviously deluded and irrelevant comments on blogs,
ignorant delusion that gravity does not have an inverse square law,
a total delusion that supermassive black holes emit dark matter,
a repeated lie that Stephen Hawking did not understand basic physics (gravity ),
a lie that people here have not explained expanding spacetime to him,
repeatedly asks obviously deluded or answered questions to waste the time of other posters,
repeated lie that science articles are about his delusions,
a lie of space not curving when the tests of GR pass with curving spacetime.
a delusion that space must "radiate information" to detect expansion
a lie of a prediction for "Jupiter's red spot getting taller as it shrinks"
a "Jupiter great red spot get more stronger" lie when it has been shrinking
insanity that sunspots and Jupiter's red spot have the same cause
insanity of "expanding nucleus" gibberish explaining Venus' mysterious night side (weather!)
"atoms expanding" delusions about Jupiter's north pole
3 lies of explaining redshifts or gravitational lensing.
delusions about an expanding Saturn, etc.
insane gibberish about thunderstorms.
delusions about wounds healing
deluded, lying "For The Man from international SKEPTICS forum" video
An insane video sparked by a word in Dan Brown's book



On ya rc!
__________________
"Goes without saying that nothing electrical happened." [Jonesdavid116]

"No, never electric discharges" [Tusenfem]

Usual lies about ices and dust comet papers (bedrock is not actual rock). [Reality Check, 2 May 2018]
Sol88 is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 29th April 2018, 05:34 PM   #3966
Reality Check
Penultimate Amazing
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 22,328
Originally Posted by Sol88 View Post
The mystery was solved many years ago. This thread is a Finnish physics crackpot with no known mathematical ability, little knowledge of physics shown, lots of hand waving and some primitive videos mostly lying about physics even after he has been sources to learn from. Similar to you and your many electric comet delusions but less coherent from ignorance and English as a second language.
Reality Check is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 30th April 2018, 09:57 PM   #3967
Pixie of key
Graduate Poster
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 1,939
The laws of star formation challenged

https://m.phys.org/news/2018-04-laws...formation.html

Good

..
__________________
http://www.onesimpleprinciple.com/l4

"Math without words is meaningless.
Words without math can have meaning."
by Maartenn100
Pixie of key is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 1st May 2018, 01:50 PM   #3968
Reality Check
Penultimate Amazing
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 22,328
Originally Posted by Pixie of key View Post
The laws of star formation challenged

https://m.phys.org/news/2018-04-laws...formation.html

Good
In the real world, this is interesting science that has nothing to do with his delusions.

The formation of stars starts with gas clouds clumping together and collapsing. These are called star-forming cores. The star-forming cores further collapse to make groups of young stars. There was a "astrophysical law" that the mass distribution of star-forming cores is the same as the young stars. But that law was based on gas clouds close to the Solar System which are not representative of the diversity of the clouds.

Now we have the ALMA antenna array looking at the more typical, active star-formation region W43-MM1 and "the distribution did not obey Salpeter's 1955 law". There were more massive cores than predicted and fewer less massive cores.

Finnish physics crackpot with no known mathematical ability, little knowledge of physics shown, lots of hand waving and some primitive videos and
lies about science being a religion,
a lie of no observations for expanding space ,
an irrational demand for the impossible direct measurement of the curvature of spacetime,
a lie that pulling forces have not been measured,
repeated idiocy of quoting obviously deluded and irrelevant comments on blogs,
ignorant delusion that gravity does not have an inverse square law,
a total delusion that supermassive black holes emit dark matter,
a repeated lie that Stephen Hawking did not understand basic physics (gravity ),
a lie that people here have not explained expanding spacetime to him,
repeatedly asks obviously deluded or answered questions to waste the time of other posters,
repeated lie that science articles are about his delusions,
a lie of space not curving when the tests of GR pass with curving spacetime.
a delusion that space must "radiate information" to detect expansion
a lie of a prediction for "Jupiter's red spot getting taller as it shrinks"
a "Jupiter great red spot get more stronger" lie when it has been shrinking
insanity that sunspots and Jupiter's red spot have the same cause
insanity of "expanding nucleus" gibberish explaining Venus' mysterious night side (weather!)
"atoms expanding" delusions about Jupiter's north pole
3 lies of explaining redshifts or gravitational lensing.
delusions about an expanding Saturn, etc.
insane gibberish about thunderstorms.
delusions about wounds healing
deluded, lying "For The Man from international SKEPTICS forum" video
An insane video sparked by a word in Dan Brown's book


..
Reality Check is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 5th May 2018, 11:35 AM   #3969
Pixie of key
Graduate Poster
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 1,939
Viral infection a matter of simple physics

https://m.phys.org/news/2018-05-vira...e-physics.html


"A phage consists of a head and a tail. The tail acts as an injection needle that can penetrate the cell membrane. The DNA is stored in the head of the phage, and exerts a pressure of around 60 bar. That is equivalent to 20 times the pressure in a fully inflated car tyre, or the pressure at 600 meters under water. Once the tail of the phage penetrates the cell, the 'valve' opens and the DNA is injected into the cell at high speed. This quickly releases the pressure of the DNA inside the phage. An outstanding question facing the researchers was therefore: what forces the last portion of DNA to enter the cell once the pressure has been released?

In an experiment, the researchers determined the speed of the DNA transport from phage to cell in phages in which only the initial pressure was different. In both cases, the researchers observed two distinct steps. Calculations confirmed their suspicion that the driving force in the first step is indeed the pressure, and nothing but the pressure."

.

😀😀😀

MrNicePressure

.
__________________
http://www.onesimpleprinciple.com/l4

"Math without words is meaningless.
Words without math can have meaning."
by Maartenn100
Pixie of key is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 6th May 2018, 12:30 PM   #3970
The Man
Scourge, of the supernatural
 
The Man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Poughkeepsie, NY
Posts: 13,132
Originally Posted by Pixie of key View Post
Viral infection a matter of simple physics

https://m.phys.org/news/2018-05-vira...e-physics.html


"A phage consists of a head and a tail. The tail acts as an injection needle that can penetrate the cell membrane. The DNA is stored in the head of the phage, and exerts a pressure of around 60 bar. That is equivalent to 20 times the pressure in a fully inflated car tyre, or the pressure at 600 meters under water. Once the tail of the phage penetrates the cell, the 'valve' opens and the DNA is injected into the cell at high speed. This quickly releases the pressure of the DNA inside the phage. An outstanding question facing the researchers was therefore: what forces the last portion of DNA to enter the cell once the pressure has been released?

In an experiment, the researchers determined the speed of the DNA transport from phage to cell in phages in which only the initial pressure was different. In both cases, the researchers observed two distinct steps. Calculations confirmed their suspicion that the driving force in the first step is indeed the pressure, and nothing but the pressure."

.

😀😀😀

MrNicePressure

.
Who the heck would have been arguing that viral infection was inherently unphysical?!? Heck, even computer virus infection is "a matter of simple physics".







So, have you actually tried that rope experiment yet?


If not, why not?


If so, why haven't you reported what you found?

It would clearly demonstrate the difference between pulling and pushing forces. Particularly on materials that, well, react differently to such differing forces.

How do the observations of that experiment support your "point of view", particularly about there being no pulling forces.

Anteeksi en voi edes jäsentää sitä viimeistä bittiä.

Joten, oletko todella kokeillut tätä köysikokeilua vielä?


Jos ei, miksi ei?


Jos on, niin miksi et ilmoittanut, mitä löysit?

Se osoittaisi selkeästi vetovoiman ja työntövoimien välisen eron. Erityisesti materiaaleista, jotka hyvin reagoivat eri tavoin eriarvoisiin voimavaroihin.

Kuinka tämän kokeilun havainnot tukevat sinun "näkökulmastasi", etenkään siitä, että ei ole vetovoimia.
__________________
BRAINZZZZZZZZ
The Man is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 8th May 2018, 05:43 AM   #3971
Pixie of key
Graduate Poster
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 1,939
Unexpected behaviour of atom clouds challenges existing theories

https://m.phys.org/news/2018-05-unex...-theories.html

There is no pulling force, no curving space.

Just expanding pushing force.

.
__________________
http://www.onesimpleprinciple.com/l4

"Math without words is meaningless.
Words without math can have meaning."
by Maartenn100
Pixie of key is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 8th May 2018, 07:13 AM   #3972
steenkh
Philosopher
 
steenkh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Denmark
Posts: 5,357
Originally Posted by Pixie of key View Post
Unexpected behaviour of atom clouds challenges existing theories

https://m.phys.org/news/2018-05-unex...-theories.html

There is no pulling force, no curving space.

Just expanding pushing force.
In what way is curved space, pulling, or expanding pushing forces involved here?
__________________
Steen

--
Jack of all trades - master of none!
steenkh is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 8th May 2018, 09:51 AM   #3973
Pixie of key
Graduate Poster
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 1,939
Originally Posted by steenkh View Post
In what way is curved space, pulling, or expanding pushing forces involved here?
Space is eternal and infinity place which is nothing.

In space is just pushing force which is something pyhysical way concrete. Which exist concrete way.

Space = 0

Pushing force = 1

Nucleus of atoms expanding and recycling expanding pushing force which have a nature of expanding electrons and expanding light which moving faster and faster same way what matter and light expanding.

.
__________________
http://www.onesimpleprinciple.com/l4

"Math without words is meaningless.
Words without math can have meaning."
by Maartenn100
Pixie of key is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 8th May 2018, 11:03 AM   #3974
The Man
Scourge, of the supernatural
 
The Man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Poughkeepsie, NY
Posts: 13,132
Anyone who didn't guess "expanding and recycling expanding pushing force" would be the explanation of the involvement, slap yourself in the face. pull on your cheek (pulling force).

Pulling force = <-->
__________________
BRAINZZZZZZZZ
The Man is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 8th May 2018, 11:51 AM   #3975
Pixie of key
Graduate Poster
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 1,939
Only the idiots assume that quarks are attracted to each other, the more they are furthest from each other.

The truly expanding quarks push each other away from each other, the less farther they are. And then the amount of external pressure / pushed force remaining constant is enough to push them towards each other more easily than normal.

And thats the way it is!!!

.
__________________
http://www.onesimpleprinciple.com/l4

"Math without words is meaningless.
Words without math can have meaning."
by Maartenn100
Pixie of key is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 8th May 2018, 11:59 AM   #3976
Pixie of key
Graduate Poster
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 1,939
Only the idiots assume that quarks are attracted to each other, the more they are furthest from each other.

The really expanding quarks push each away from each other not so much, the farther they are. Then the amount of external pressure / thrust that remains constant is enough to push them towards each other more easily than normally.

And so it is!
__________________
http://www.onesimpleprinciple.com/l4

"Math without words is meaningless.
Words without math can have meaning."
by Maartenn100
Pixie of key is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 8th May 2018, 12:01 PM   #3977
The Man
Scourge, of the supernatural
 
The Man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Poughkeepsie, NY
Posts: 13,132
Originally Posted by Pixie of key View Post
Only the idiots assume that quarks are attracted to each other, the more they are furthest from each other.

The truly expanding quarks push each other away from each other, the less farther they are. And then the amount of external pressure / pushed force remaining constant is enough to push them towards each other more easily than normal.

And thats the way it is!!!

.
Ah so they "push each other away from each other," and yet get pushed "towards each other". Do please let us know when you can at least agree with just yourself.


So, have you actually tried that rope experiment yet?


If not, why not?


If so, why haven't you reported what you found?

It would clearly demonstrate the difference between pulling and pushing forces. Particularly on materials that, well, react differently to such differing forces.

How do the observations of that experiment support your "point of view", particularly about there being no pulling forces.

Anteeksi en voi edes jäsentää sitä viimeistä bittiä.

Joten, oletko todella kokeillut tätä köysikokeilua vielä?


Jos ei, miksi ei?


Jos on, niin miksi et ilmoittanut, mitä löysit?

Se osoittaisi selkeästi vetovoiman ja työntövoimien välisen eron. Erityisesti materiaaleista, jotka hyvin reagoivat eri tavoin eriarvoisiin voimavaroihin.

Kuinka tämän kokeilun havainnot tukevat sinun "näkökulmastasi", etenkään siitä, että ei ole vetovoimia.
__________________
BRAINZZZZZZZZ
The Man is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 8th May 2018, 01:19 PM   #3978
Pixie of key
Graduate Poster
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 1,939
Funny Video because my english is so terrible

Lets use yours own brains, please...

https://youtu.be/BHkIeds0hCQ

.

.
__________________
http://www.onesimpleprinciple.com/l4

"Math without words is meaningless.
Words without math can have meaning."
by Maartenn100
Pixie of key is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 9th May 2018, 02:40 PM   #3979
Reality Check
Penultimate Amazing
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 22,328
Originally Posted by Pixie of key View Post
Viral infection a matter of simple physics

https://m.phys.org/news/2018-05-vira...e-physics.html


"A phage consists of a head and a tail. The tail acts as an injection needle that can penetrate the cell membrane. The DNA is stored in the head of the phage, and exerts a pressure of around 60 bar. That is equivalent to 20 times the pressure in a fully inflated car tyre, or the pressure at 600 meters under water. Once the tail of the phage penetrates the cell, the 'valve' opens and the DNA is injected into the cell at high speed. This quickly releases the pressure of the DNA inside the phage. An outstanding question facing the researchers was therefore: what forces the last portion of DNA to enter the cell once the pressure has been released?

In an experiment, the researchers determined the speed of the DNA transport from phage to cell in phages in which only the initial pressure was different. In both cases, the researchers observed two distinct steps. Calculations confirmed their suspicion that the driving force in the first step is indeed the pressure, and nothing but the pressure."
Irrelevant post from a Finnish physics crackpot with no known mathematical ability, little knowledge of physics shown, lots of hand waving and some primitive videos and
lies about science being a religion,
a lie of no observations for expanding space ,
an irrational demand for the impossible direct measurement of the curvature of spacetime,
a lie that pulling forces have not been measured,
repeated idiocy of quoting obviously deluded and irrelevant comments on blogs,
ignorant delusion that gravity does not have an inverse square law,
a total delusion that supermassive black holes emit dark matter,
a repeated lie that Stephen Hawking did not understand basic physics (gravity ),
a lie that people here have not explained expanding spacetime to him,
repeatedly asks obviously deluded or answered questions to waste the time of other posters,
repeated lie that science articles are about his delusions,
a lie of space not curving when the tests of GR pass with curving spacetime.
a delusion that space must "radiate information" to detect expansion
a lie of a prediction for "Jupiter's red spot getting taller as it shrinks"
a "Jupiter great red spot get more stronger" lie when it has been shrinking
insanity that sunspots and Jupiter's red spot have the same cause
insanity of "expanding nucleus" gibberish explaining Venus' mysterious night side (weather!)
"atoms expanding" delusions about Jupiter's north pole
3 lies of explaining redshifts or gravitational lensing.
delusions about an expanding Saturn, etc.
insane gibberish about thunderstorms.
delusions about wounds healing
deluded, lying "For The Man from international SKEPTICS forum" video
An insane video sparked by a word in Dan Brown's book
Reality Check is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 9th May 2018, 02:42 PM   #3980
Reality Check
Penultimate Amazing
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 22,328
Originally Posted by Pixie of key View Post
Unexpected behaviour of atom clouds challenges existing theories

https://m.phys.org/news/2018-05-unex...-theories.html
followed by the usual lies. This is not cosmology. Nothing to do with his inane delusions !

Finnish physics crackpot with no known mathematical ability, little knowledge of physics shown, lots of hand waving and some primitive videos and
lies about science being a religion,
a lie of no observations for expanding space ,
an irrational demand for the impossible direct measurement of the curvature of spacetime,
a lie that pulling forces have not been measured,
repeated idiocy of quoting obviously deluded and irrelevant comments on blogs,
ignorant delusion that gravity does not have an inverse square law,
a total delusion that supermassive black holes emit dark matter,
a repeated lie that Stephen Hawking did not understand basic physics (gravity ),
a lie that people here have not explained expanding spacetime to him,
repeatedly asks obviously deluded or answered questions to waste the time of other posters,
repeated lie that science articles are about his delusions,
a lie of space not curving when the tests of GR pass with curving spacetime.
a delusion that space must "radiate information" to detect expansion
a lie of a prediction for "Jupiter's red spot getting taller as it shrinks"
a "Jupiter great red spot get more stronger" lie when it has been shrinking
insanity that sunspots and Jupiter's red spot have the same cause
insanity of "expanding nucleus" gibberish explaining Venus' mysterious night side (weather!)
"atoms expanding" delusions about Jupiter's north pole
3 lies of explaining redshifts or gravitational lensing.
delusions about an expanding Saturn, etc.
insane gibberish about thunderstorms.
delusions about wounds healing
deluded, lying "For The Man from international SKEPTICS forum" video
An insane video sparked by a word in Dan Brown's book
Reality Check is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 9th May 2018, 02:44 PM   #3981
Reality Check
Penultimate Amazing
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 22,328
Originally Posted by Pixie of key View Post
Space ...
Usual gibberish and lies.

Finnish physics crackpot with no known mathematical ability, little knowledge of physics shown, lots of hand waving and some primitive videos and
lies about science being a religion,
a lie of no observations for expanding space ,
an irrational demand for the impossible direct measurement of the curvature of spacetime,
a lie that pulling forces have not been measured,
repeated idiocy of quoting obviously deluded and irrelevant comments on blogs,
ignorant delusion that gravity does not have an inverse square law,
a total delusion that supermassive black holes emit dark matter,
a repeated lie that Stephen Hawking did not understand basic physics (gravity ),
a lie that people here have not explained expanding spacetime to him,
repeatedly asks obviously deluded or answered questions to waste the time of other posters,
repeated lie that science articles are about his delusions,
a lie of space not curving when the tests of GR pass with curving spacetime.
a delusion that space must "radiate information" to detect expansion
a lie of a prediction for "Jupiter's red spot getting taller as it shrinks"
a "Jupiter great red spot get more stronger" lie when it has been shrinking
insanity that sunspots and Jupiter's red spot have the same cause
insanity of "expanding nucleus" gibberish explaining Venus' mysterious night side (weather!)
"atoms expanding" delusions about Jupiter's north pole
3 lies of explaining redshifts or gravitational lensing.
delusions about an expanding Saturn, etc.
insane gibberish about thunderstorms.
delusions about wounds healing
deluded, lying "For The Man from international SKEPTICS forum" video
An insane video sparked by a word in Dan Brown's book
Reality Check is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 9th May 2018, 02:47 PM   #3982
Reality Check
Penultimate Amazing
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 22,328
Originally Posted by Pixie of key View Post
Only the idiots assume that quarks are attracted to each other, the more they are furthest from each other.
Insults, ignorance, gibberish and lies. The physical evidence is that quarks cannot be isolated because so much energy is added that more quarks are created.

Finnish physics crackpot with no known mathematical ability, little knowledge of physics shown, lots of hand waving and some primitive videos and
lies about science being a religion,
a lie of no observations for expanding space ,
an irrational demand for the impossible direct measurement of the curvature of spacetime,
a lie that pulling forces have not been measured,
repeated idiocy of quoting obviously deluded and irrelevant comments on blogs,
ignorant delusion that gravity does not have an inverse square law,
a total delusion that supermassive black holes emit dark matter,
a repeated lie that Stephen Hawking did not understand basic physics (gravity ),
a lie that people here have not explained expanding spacetime to him,
repeatedly asks obviously deluded or answered questions to waste the time of other posters,
repeated lie that science articles are about his delusions,
a lie of space not curving when the tests of GR pass with curving spacetime.
a delusion that space must "radiate information" to detect expansion
a lie of a prediction for "Jupiter's red spot getting taller as it shrinks"
a "Jupiter great red spot get more stronger" lie when it has been shrinking
insanity that sunspots and Jupiter's red spot have the same cause
insanity of "expanding nucleus" gibberish explaining Venus' mysterious night side (weather!)
"atoms expanding" delusions about Jupiter's north pole
3 lies of explaining redshifts or gravitational lensing.
delusions about an expanding Saturn, etc.
insane gibberish about thunderstorms.
delusions about wounds healing
deluded, lying "For The Man from international SKEPTICS forum" video
An insane video sparked by a word in Dan Brown's book

Last edited by Reality Check; 9th May 2018 at 02:49 PM.
Reality Check is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 9th May 2018, 02:56 PM   #3983
Reality Check
Penultimate Amazing
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 22,328
Originally Posted by Pixie of key View Post
...
A lying and insulting "Lets use yours own brains, please..." video because he has never used his brains in this thread !

Ignorant gibberish about quarks.
The strong interaction rises to become roughly constant
Quote:
The strong force acts between quarks. Unlike all other forces (electromagnetic, weak, and gravitational), the strong force does not diminish in strength with increasing distance between pairs of quarks. After a limiting distance (about the size of a hadron) has been reached, it remains at a strength of about 10,000 newtons (N), no matter how much farther the distance between the quarks.[5]


Finnish physics crackpot with no known mathematical ability, little knowledge of physics shown, lots of hand waving and some primitive videos and
lies about science being a religion,
a lie of no observations for expanding space ,
an irrational demand for the impossible direct measurement of the curvature of spacetime,
a lie that pulling forces have not been measured,
repeated idiocy of quoting obviously deluded and irrelevant comments on blogs,
ignorant delusion that gravity does not have an inverse square law,
a total delusion that supermassive black holes emit dark matter,
a repeated lie that Stephen Hawking did not understand basic physics (gravity ),
a lie that people here have not explained expanding spacetime to him,
repeatedly asks obviously deluded or answered questions to waste the time of other posters,
repeated lie that science articles are about his delusions,
a lie of space not curving when the tests of GR pass with curving spacetime.
a delusion that space must "radiate information" to detect expansion
a lie of a prediction for "Jupiter's red spot getting taller as it shrinks"
a "Jupiter great red spot get more stronger" lie when it has been shrinking
insanity that sunspots and Jupiter's red spot have the same cause
insanity of "expanding nucleus" gibberish explaining Venus' mysterious night side (weather!)
"atoms expanding" delusions about Jupiter's north pole
3 lies of explaining redshifts or gravitational lensing.
delusions about an expanding Saturn, etc.
insane gibberish about thunderstorms.
delusions about wounds healing
deluded, lying "For The Man from international SKEPTICS forum" video
An insane video sparked by a word in Dan Brown's book
Reality Check is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 15th May 2018, 03:36 AM   #3984
Pixie of key
Graduate Poster
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 1,939
Deeper understanding of quantum chaos may be the key to quantum computers

https://m.phys.org/news/2018-05-deep...chaos-key.html


"When the quantum dynamics of the atom chain were measured, there were surprising oscillations that persisted for much longer than expected and which couldn't be explained.

Study co-author, Dr. Zlatko Papic, Lecturer in Theoretical Physics at Leeds, said: "The previous Harvard-MIT experiment created surprisingly robust oscillations that kept the atoms in a quantum state for an extended time. We found these oscillations to be rather puzzling because they suggested that atoms were somehow able to "remember" their initial configuration while still moving chaotically.

"Our goal was to understand more generally where such oscillations could come from, since oscillations signify some kind of coherence in a chaotic environment—and this is precisely what we want from a robust quantum computer. Our work suggests that these oscillations are due to a new physical phenomenon that we called 'quantum many-body scar'.""

Atomien ytimet laajenevat ja kierrättävät KAIKKIEN muiden laajenevien ytimien kanssa laajenevaa työntävää voimaa jolla on mm. laajenevien elektronien ja laajenevan valon luonne.



Atomic cores expand and recycle with ALL of the other expanding kernels with expanding pushing force that has, for example, the nature of expanding electrons and the expanding light.

.
__________________
http://www.onesimpleprinciple.com/l4

"Math without words is meaningless.
Words without math can have meaning."
by Maartenn100
Pixie of key is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 15th May 2018, 07:13 AM   #3985
The Man
Scourge, of the supernatural
 
The Man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Poughkeepsie, NY
Posts: 13,132
Originally Posted by Pixie of key View Post
Deeper understanding of quantum chaos may be the key to quantum computers

https://m.phys.org/news/2018-05-deep...chaos-key.html


"When the quantum dynamics of the atom chain were measured, there were surprising oscillations that persisted for much longer than expected and which couldn't be explained.

Study co-author, Dr. Zlatko Papic, Lecturer in Theoretical Physics at Leeds, said: "The previous Harvard-MIT experiment created surprisingly robust oscillations that kept the atoms in a quantum state for an extended time. We found these oscillations to be rather puzzling because they suggested that atoms were somehow able to "remember" their initial configuration while still moving chaotically.

"Our goal was to understand more generally where such oscillations could come from, since oscillations signify some kind of coherence in a chaotic environment—and this is precisely what we want from a robust quantum computer. Our work suggests that these oscillations are due to a new physical phenomenon that we called 'quantum many-body scar'.""

Atomien ytimet laajenevat ja kierrättävät KAIKKIEN muiden laajenevien ytimien kanssa laajenevaa työntävää voimaa jolla on mm. laajenevien elektronien ja laajenevan valon luonne.



Atomic cores expand and recycle with ALL of the other expanding kernels with expanding pushing force that has, for example, the nature of expanding electrons and the expanding light.

.
Once again the article you quote says no such thing as you asserted. Evidently all your "Atomic cores expand and recycle with ALL of the other expanding kernels with expanding pushing force that has, for example, the nature of expanding electrons and the expanding light." can push is just unrelated spam.


So, have you actually tried that rope experiment yet?


If not, why not?


If so, why haven't you reported what you found?

It would clearly demonstrate the difference between pulling and pushing forces. Particularly on materials that, well, react differently to such differing forces.

How do the observations of that experiment support your "point of view", particularly about there being no pulling forces.

Anteeksi en voi edes jäsentää sitä viimeistä bittiä.

Joten, oletko todella kokeillut tätä köysikokeilua vielä?


Jos ei, miksi ei?


Jos on, niin miksi et ilmoittanut, mitä löysit?

Se osoittaisi selkeästi vetovoiman ja työntövoimien välisen eron. Erityisesti materiaaleista, jotka hyvin reagoivat eri tavoin eriarvoisiin voimavaroihin.

Kuinka tämän kokeilun havainnot tukevat sinun "näkökulmastasi", etenkään siitä, että ei ole vetovoimia.
__________________
BRAINZZZZZZZZ
The Man is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 15th May 2018, 01:39 PM   #3986
Reality Check
Penultimate Amazing
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 22,328
Thumbs down Usual lies about science (non-quantum chaos or computers gibberish)

Originally Posted by Pixie of key View Post
Deeper understanding of quantum chaos may be the key to quantum computers

https://m.phys.org/news/2018-05-deep...chaos-key.html


"When the quantum dynamics of the atom chain were measured, there were surprising oscillations that persisted for much longer than expected and which couldn't be explained.

Study co-author, Dr. Zlatko Papic, Lecturer in Theoretical Physics at Leeds, said: "The previous Harvard-MIT experiment created surprisingly robust oscillations that kept the atoms in a quantum state for an extended time. We found these oscillations to be rather puzzling because they suggested that atoms were somehow able to "remember" their initial configuration while still moving chaotically.

"Our goal was to understand more generally where such oscillations could come from, since oscillations signify some kind of coherence in a chaotic environment—and this is precisely what we want from a robust quantum computer. Our work suggests that these oscillations are due to a new physical phenomenon that we called 'quantum many-body scar'.""
Usual lies about science (non-quantum chaos or computers gibberish).

Finnish physics crackpot with no known mathematical ability, little knowledge of physics shown, lots of hand waving and some primitive videos and
lies about science being a religion,
a lie of no observations for expanding space ,
an irrational demand for the impossible direct measurement of the curvature of spacetime,
a lie that pulling forces have not been measured,
repeated idiocy of quoting obviously deluded and irrelevant comments on blogs,
ignorant delusion that gravity does not have an inverse square law,
a total delusion that supermassive black holes emit dark matter,
a repeated lie that Stephen Hawking did not understand basic physics (gravity ),
a lie that people here have not explained expanding spacetime to him,
repeatedly asks obviously deluded or answered questions to waste the time of other posters,
repeated lie that science articles are about his delusions,
a lie of space not curving when the tests of GR pass with curving spacetime.
a delusion that space must "radiate information" to detect expansion
a lie of a prediction for "Jupiter's red spot getting taller as it shrinks"
a "Jupiter great red spot get more stronger" lie when it has been shrinking
insanity that sunspots and Jupiter's red spot have the same cause
insanity of "expanding nucleus" gibberish explaining Venus' mysterious night side (weather!)
"atoms expanding" delusions about Jupiter's north pole
3 lies of explaining redshifts or gravitational lensing.
delusions about an expanding Saturn, etc.
insane gibberish about thunderstorms.
delusions about wounds healing
deluded, lying "For The Man from international SKEPTICS forum" video
An insane video sparked by a word in Dan Brown's book
Reality Check is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 16th May 2018, 11:31 AM   #3987
Pixie of key
Graduate Poster
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 1,939
Astronomers find evidence for stars forming just 250 million years after Big Bang

https://m.phys.org/news/2018-05-alma...-universe.html

"The team then reconstructed the star formation history in the galaxy using infrared data taken with the NASA/ESA Hubble Space Telescope and NASA's Spitzer Space Telescope. The observed brightness of the galaxy is well explained by a model where the onset of star formation was another 250 million years ago. The model indicates that the star formation became inactive after the first stars ignited. It was then revived at the epoch of the ALMA observations: 500 million years after the Big Bang.

The astronomers suggest that the first burst of star formation blew the gas away from the galaxy, which would suppress the star formation for a time. The gas then fell back into the galaxy leading to the second burst of star formation. The massive newborn stars in the second burst ionized the oxygen between the stars; it is those emissions that have been detected with ALMA."

Galaksit syntyvät sisältä ulos päin 😀

Galaxys born inside to outside 😀

🍾🍾🍾

.
__________________
http://www.onesimpleprinciple.com/l4

"Math without words is meaningless.
Words without math can have meaning."
by Maartenn100
Pixie of key is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 16th May 2018, 02:00 PM   #3988
Reality Check
Penultimate Amazing
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 22,328
Thumbs down Usual insane gibberish irrelevant to a science article

Originally Posted by Pixie of key View Post
Astronomers find evidence for stars forming just 250 million years after Big Bang

https://m.phys.org/news/2018-05-alma...-universe.html

"The team then reconstructed the star formation history in the galaxy using infrared data taken with the NASA/ESA Hubble Space Telescope and NASA's Spitzer Space Telescope. The observed brightness of the galaxy is well explained by a model where the onset of star formation was another 250 million years ago. The model indicates that the star formation became inactive after the first stars ignited. It was then revived at the epoch of the ALMA observations: 500 million years after the Big Bang.

The astronomers suggest that the first burst of star formation blew the gas away from the galaxy, which would suppress the star formation for a time. The gas then fell back into the galaxy leading to the second burst of star formation. The massive newborn stars in the second burst ionized the oxygen between the stars; it is those emissions that have been detected with ALMA."
Usual insane gibberish irrelevant to a science article about stars forming.

Finnish physics crackpot with no known mathematical ability, little knowledge of physics shown, lots of hand waving and some primitive videos and
lies about science being a religion,
a lie of no observations for expanding space ,
an irrational demand for the impossible direct measurement of the curvature of spacetime,
a lie that pulling forces have not been measured,
repeated idiocy of quoting obviously deluded and irrelevant comments on blogs,
ignorant delusion that gravity does not have an inverse square law,
a total delusion that supermassive black holes emit dark matter,
a repeated lie that Stephen Hawking did not understand basic physics (gravity ),
a lie that people here have not explained expanding spacetime to him,
repeatedly asks obviously deluded or answered questions to waste the time of other posters,
repeated lie that science articles are about his delusions,
a lie of space not curving when the tests of GR pass with curving spacetime.
a delusion that space must "radiate information" to detect expansion
a lie of a prediction for "Jupiter's red spot getting taller as it shrinks"
a "Jupiter great red spot get more stronger" lie when it has been shrinking
insanity that sunspots and Jupiter's red spot have the same cause
insanity of "expanding nucleus" gibberish explaining Venus' mysterious night side (weather!)
"atoms expanding" delusions about Jupiter's north pole
3 lies of explaining redshifts or gravitational lensing.
delusions about an expanding Saturn, etc.
insane gibberish about thunderstorms.
delusions about wounds healing
deluded, lying "For The Man from international SKEPTICS forum" video
An insane video sparked by a word in Dan Brown's book
Reality Check is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 17th May 2018, 09:04 AM   #3989
Pixie of key
Graduate Poster
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 1,939
First measurement of subatomic particle's mechanical property reveals distribution of pressure inside proton

https://m.phys.org/news/2018-05-suba...y-reveals.html

"The nuclear physicists found that the proton's building blocks, the quarks, are subjected to a pressure of 100 decillion Pascal (1035) near the center of a proton, which is about 10 times greater than the pressure in the heart of a neutron star. The result was recently published in the journal Nature.

"We found an extremely high outward-directed pressure from the center of the proton, and a much lower and more extended inward-directed pressure near the proton's periphery," explains Volker Burkert, Jefferson Lab Hall B Leader and a co-author on the paper.

Burkert says that the distribution of pressure inside the proton is dictated by the strong force, the force that binds three quarks together to make a proton."

Protonit ja neutronit laajenevat ja kierrättävät laajenevaa työntävää voimaa kaikkien muiden laajenevien protoneiden ja neutroneiden kanssa.

On vain työntävää voimaa.

Paineen vaihtelua.

Työntävän voiman tiheyden vaihtelua aluettain avaruudessa joka on ei yhtään mitään.


Protones and neutrons expand and recycle expanding pushing force with all other expanding protons and neutrons.

It's just a pushing force.

Pressure variation.

The variation of the pushing force density in the space in space that is nothing at all 😀

🍾🍾🍾

.
__________________
http://www.onesimpleprinciple.com/l4

"Math without words is meaningless.
Words without math can have meaning."
by Maartenn100
Pixie of key is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 17th May 2018, 01:36 PM   #3990
Reality Check
Penultimate Amazing
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 22,328
Thumbs down Usual insane gibberish about a science article (pressure inside a proton).

Originally Posted by Pixie of key View Post
First measurement of subatomic particle's mechanical property reveals distribution of pressure inside proton

https://m.phys.org/news/2018-05-suba...y-reveals.html

"The nuclear physicists found that the proton's building blocks, the quarks, are subjected to a pressure of 100 decillion Pascal (1035) near the center of a proton, which is about 10 times greater than the pressure in the heart of a neutron star. The result was recently published in the journal Nature.

"We found an extremely high outward-directed pressure from the center of the proton, and a much lower and more extended inward-directed pressure near the proton's periphery," explains Volker Burkert, Jefferson Lab Hall B Leader and a co-author on the paper.

Burkert says that the distribution of pressure inside the proton is dictated by the strong force, the force that binds three quarks together to make a proton."
Usual insane gibberish about a science article (pressure inside a proton).

Finnish physics crackpot with no known mathematical ability, little knowledge of physics shown, lots of hand waving and some primitive videos and
lies about science being a religion,
a lie of no observations for expanding space ,
an irrational demand for the impossible direct measurement of the curvature of spacetime,
a lie that pulling forces have not been measured,
repeated idiocy of quoting obviously deluded and irrelevant comments on blogs,
ignorant delusion that gravity does not have an inverse square law,
a total delusion that supermassive black holes emit dark matter,
a repeated lie that Stephen Hawking did not understand basic physics (gravity ),
a lie that people here have not explained expanding spacetime to him,
repeatedly asks obviously deluded or answered questions to waste the time of other posters,
repeated lie that science articles are about his delusions,
a lie of space not curving when the tests of GR pass with curving spacetime.
a delusion that space must "radiate information" to detect expansion
a lie of a prediction for "Jupiter's red spot getting taller as it shrinks"
a "Jupiter great red spot get more stronger" lie when it has been shrinking
insanity that sunspots and Jupiter's red spot have the same cause
insanity of "expanding nucleus" gibberish explaining Venus' mysterious night side (weather!)
"atoms expanding" delusions about Jupiter's north pole
3 lies of explaining redshifts or gravitational lensing.
delusions about an expanding Saturn, etc.
insane gibberish about thunderstorms.
delusions about wounds healing
deluded, lying "For The Man from international SKEPTICS forum" video
An insane video sparked by a word in Dan Brown's book
Reality Check is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 20th May 2018, 12:03 AM   #3991
Pixie of key
Graduate Poster
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 1,939
Originally Posted by Pixie of key View Post
First measurement of subatomic particle's mechanical property reveals distribution of pressure inside proton

https://m.phys.org/news/2018-05-suba...y-reveals.html

"The nuclear physicists found that the proton's building blocks, the quarks, are subjected to a pressure of 100 decillion Pascal (1035) near the center of a proton, which is about 10 times greater than the pressure in the heart of a neutron star. The result was recently published in the journal Nature.

"We found an extremely high outward-directed pressure from the center of the proton, and a much lower and more extended inward-directed pressure near the proton's periphery," explains Volker Burkert, Jefferson Lab Hall B Leader and a co-author on the paper.

Burkert says that the distribution of pressure inside the proton is dictated by the strong force, the force that binds three quarks together to make a proton."

Protonit ja neutronit laajenevat ja kierrättävät laajenevaa työntävää voimaa kaikkien muiden laajenevien protoneiden ja neutroneiden kanssa.

On vain työntävää voimaa.

Paineen vaihtelua.

Työntävän voiman tiheyden vaihtelua aluettain avaruudessa joka on ei yhtään mitään.


Protones and neutrons expand and recycle expanding pushing force with all other expanding protons and neutrons.

It's just a pushing force.

Pressure variation.

The variation of the pushing force density in the space in space that is nothing at all 😀

🍾🍾🍾

.
What is pressure inside expanding quarks?!?

😀
__________________
http://www.onesimpleprinciple.com/l4

"Math without words is meaningless.
Words without math can have meaning."
by Maartenn100
Pixie of key is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 20th May 2018, 12:17 AM   #3992
Pixie of key
Graduate Poster
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 1,939
"Nuclear physicists have found that the proton's building blocks, the quarks, are subjected to a pressure of 100 decillion Pascal (1035) near the center of a proton, which is about 10 times greater than the pressure in the heart of a neutron star."

https://m.phys.org/news/2018-05-suba...y-reveals.html

Joten laajenevien kvarkkien sisäisen paineen täytyy olla melkoinen.

Eikä sen aisoissa pitämiseen tarvita mitään höpö höpö vetäviä voimia!!!

Riittää että laajenevat kvarkit kierrättävät kaikkien muiden laajenevien kvarkkien kanssa laajenevaa työntävää voimaa josta laajeneva valo syntyy ja josta myös laajenevat elektronit syntyvät.

So the internal pressure of the extending quarks must be quite high.

And it's not necessary to keep it in the shadows!

It is sufficient that the expanding quarks recycle with all the other expanding quarks the expanding pushing force which have a nature of expanding light and nature of expanding electrons.

🍾🍾🍾

😀
__________________
http://www.onesimpleprinciple.com/l4

"Math without words is meaningless.
Words without math can have meaning."
by Maartenn100

Last edited by Pixie of key; 20th May 2018 at 12:18 AM.
Pixie of key is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 20th May 2018, 05:22 AM   #3993
abaddon
Penultimate Amazing
 
abaddon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 17,990
Originally Posted by Pixie of key View Post
What is pressure inside expanding quarks?!?

😀
The pressure of what? What is inside quarks to even have a pressure?
__________________
Who is General Failure? And why is he reading my hard drive?


...love and buttercakes...
abaddon is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 20th May 2018, 05:33 AM   #3994
Pixie of key
Graduate Poster
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 1,939
Originally Posted by abaddon View Post
The pressure of what? What is inside quarks to even have a pressure?
There is zillions smaller expanding thing which recycling expanding pushing force with each other.

"You may have heard that a proton is made from three quarks. Indeed here are several pages that say so. This is a lie — a white lie, but a big one. In fact there are zillions of gluons, antiquarks, and quarks in a proton. The standard shorthand, “the proton is made from two up quarks and one down quark”, is really a statement that the proton has two more up quarks than up antiquarks, and one more down quark than down antiquarks. To make the glib shorthand correct you need to add the phrase “plus zillions of gluons and zillions of quark-antiquark pairs.” Without this phrase, one’s view of the proton is so simplistic that it is not possible to understand the LHC at all.""

https://profmattstrassler.com/articl...proton-anyway/

🍾🍾🍾

😀
__________________
http://www.onesimpleprinciple.com/l4

"Math without words is meaningless.
Words without math can have meaning."
by Maartenn100
Pixie of key is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 20th May 2018, 05:42 AM   #3995
The Man
Scourge, of the supernatural
 
The Man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Poughkeepsie, NY
Posts: 13,132
Originally Posted by Pixie of key View Post
There is zillions smaller expanding thing which recycling expanding pushing force with each other.

"You may have heard that a proton is made from three quarks. Indeed here are several pages that say so. This is a lie — a white lie, but a big one. In fact there are zillions of gluons, antiquarks, and quarks in a proton. The standard shorthand, “the proton is made from two up quarks and one down quark”, is really a statement that the proton has two more up quarks than up antiquarks, and one more down quark than down antiquarks. To make the glib shorthand correct you need to add the phrase “plus zillions of gluons and zillions of quark-antiquark pairs.” Without this phrase, one’s view of the proton is so simplistic that it is not possible to understand the LHC at all.""

https://profmattstrassler.com/articl...proton-anyway/

🍾🍾🍾

😀
And once again your citation does not support your assertions. Your citation says nothing about "smaller expanding thing which recycling expanding pushing force with each other."


So, have you actually tried that rope experiment yet?


If not, why not?


If so, why haven't you reported what you found?

It would clearly demonstrate the difference between pulling and pushing forces. Particularly on materials that, well, react differently to such differing forces.

How do the observations of that experiment support your "point of view", particularly about there being no pulling forces.

Anteeksi en voi edes jäsentää sitä viimeistä bittiä.

Joten, oletko todella kokeillut tätä köysikokeilua vielä?


Jos ei, miksi ei?


Jos on, niin miksi et ilmoittanut, mitä löysit?

Se osoittaisi selkeästi vetovoiman ja työntövoimien välisen eron. Erityisesti materiaaleista, jotka hyvin reagoivat eri tavoin eriarvoisiin voimavaroihin.

Kuinka tämän kokeilun havainnot tukevat sinun "näkökulmastasi", etenkään siitä, että ei ole vetovoimia.
__________________
BRAINZZZZZZZZ
The Man is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 20th May 2018, 03:31 PM   #3996
Reality Check
Penultimate Amazing
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 22,328
Thumbs down A totally deluded question about pressure in imaginary "ending quarks"

A totally deluded question about pressure in imaginary "ending quarks" when quarks are point particles !

Finnish physics crackpot with no known mathematical ability, little knowledge of physics shown, lots of hand waving and some primitive videos and
lies about science being a religion,
a lie of no observations for expanding space ,
an irrational demand for the impossible direct measurement of the curvature of spacetime,
a lie that pulling forces have not been measured,
repeated idiocy of quoting obviously deluded and irrelevant comments on blogs,
ignorant delusion that gravity does not have an inverse square law,
a total delusion that supermassive black holes emit dark matter,
a repeated lie that Stephen Hawking did not understand basic physics (gravity ),
a lie that people here have not explained expanding spacetime to him,
repeatedly asks obviously deluded or answered questions to waste the time of other posters,
repeated lie that science articles are about his delusions,
a lie of space not curving when the tests of GR pass with curving spacetime.
a delusion that space must "radiate information" to detect expansion
a lie of a prediction for "Jupiter's red spot getting taller as it shrinks"
a "Jupiter great red spot get more stronger" lie when it has been shrinking
insanity that sunspots and Jupiter's red spot have the same cause
insanity of "expanding nucleus" gibberish explaining Venus' mysterious night side (weather!)
"atoms expanding" delusions about Jupiter's north pole
3 lies of explaining redshifts or gravitational lensing.
delusions about an expanding Saturn, etc.
insane gibberish about thunderstorms.
delusions about wounds healing
deluded, lying "For The Man from international SKEPTICS forum" video
An insane video sparked by a word in Dan Brown's book

Last edited by Reality Check; 20th May 2018 at 03:34 PM.
Reality Check is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 20th May 2018, 03:34 PM   #3997
Reality Check
Penultimate Amazing
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 22,328
Thumbs down Repeats insanity about protons and the measured pressure inside them

Repeats insanity about protons and the measured pressure inside them.

Finnish physics crackpot with no known mathematical ability, little knowledge of physics shown, lots of hand waving and some primitive videos and
lies about science being a religion,
a lie of no observations for expanding space ,
an irrational demand for the impossible direct measurement of the curvature of spacetime,
a lie that pulling forces have not been measured,
repeated idiocy of quoting obviously deluded and irrelevant comments on blogs,
ignorant delusion that gravity does not have an inverse square law,
a total delusion that supermassive black holes emit dark matter,
a repeated lie that Stephen Hawking did not understand basic physics (gravity ),
a lie that people here have not explained expanding spacetime to him,
repeatedly asks obviously deluded or answered questions to waste the time of other posters,
repeated lie that science articles are about his delusions,
a lie of space not curving when the tests of GR pass with curving spacetime.
a delusion that space must "radiate information" to detect expansion
a lie of a prediction for "Jupiter's red spot getting taller as it shrinks"
a "Jupiter great red spot get more stronger" lie when it has been shrinking
insanity that sunspots and Jupiter's red spot have the same cause
insanity of "expanding nucleus" gibberish explaining Venus' mysterious night side (weather!)
"atoms expanding" delusions about Jupiter's north pole
3 lies of explaining redshifts or gravitational lensing.
delusions about an expanding Saturn, etc.
insane gibberish about thunderstorms.
delusions about wounds healing
deluded, lying "For The Man from international SKEPTICS forum" video
An insane video sparked by a word in Dan Brown's book
Reality Check is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 21st May 2018, 07:08 AM   #3998
Pixie of key
Graduate Poster
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 1,939
I just wonder how today physics explain that pressure proton center?!?

With pulling force 😂😂😂

.
__________________
http://www.onesimpleprinciple.com/l4

"Math without words is meaningless.
Words without math can have meaning."
by Maartenn100
Pixie of key is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 21st May 2018, 08:26 AM   #3999
The Man
Scourge, of the supernatural
 
The Man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Poughkeepsie, NY
Posts: 13,132
Yes, the strong nuclear force. As it is a binding force.


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Strong_interaction


So, have you actually tried that rope experiment yet?


If not, why not?


If so, why haven't you reported what you found?

It would clearly demonstrate the difference between pulling and pushing forces. Particularly on materials that, well, react differently to such differing forces.

How do the observations of that experiment support your "point of view", particularly about there being no pulling forces.

Anteeksi en voi edes jäsentää sitä viimeistä bittiä.

Joten, oletko todella kokeillut tätä köysikokeilua vielä?


Jos ei, miksi ei?


Jos on, niin miksi et ilmoittanut, mitä löysit?

Se osoittaisi selkeästi vetovoiman ja työntövoimien välisen eron. Erityisesti materiaaleista, jotka hyvin reagoivat eri tavoin eriarvoisiin voimavaroihin.

Kuinka tämän kokeilun havainnot tukevat sinun "näkökulmastasi", etenkään siitä, että ei ole vetovoimia.
__________________
BRAINZZZZZZZZ
The Man is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 21st May 2018, 01:45 PM   #4000
Reality Check
Penultimate Amazing
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 22,328
Originally Posted by Pixie of key View Post
I just wonder how today physics explain that pressure proton center?!?
This is pressure.
Simply put: In this case, pressure is created by things bouncing off each other. Pressure in a gas is molecules bouncing off each other. Pressure in a proton is quarks and gluons bouncing off each other.

The strong interaction is the pulling force that stops the pressure from destroying protons. No pulling force, the quarks and gluons escape and there is no proton.
Reality Check is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Reply

International Skeptics Forum » General Topics » Science, Mathematics, Medicine, and Technology

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:23 PM.
Powered by vBulletin. Copyright ©2000 - 2018, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This forum began as part of the James Randi Education Foundation (JREF). However, the forum now exists as
an independent entity with no affiliation with or endorsement by the JREF, including the section in reference to "JREF" topics.

Disclaimer: Messages posted in the Forum are solely the opinion of their authors.