Ok, I think it was enough time for potentially interested "Skeptics" to find out for themselves which fallacy Reheat commits with his stunt. It's of course classic case Strawman. All is said about it for example starting here (see long version at the link in that post). Amusingly, Reheat described there quite accurately what he himself did in a typical case of projection, blaming one's own sins on someone else:
You know it doesn't matter a lick what semantic games you people play. AA 77 hit the Pentagon. Period. Any other notions are either the rantings of a full blown lunatic, or a liar.
Hay, CE. Where are you? Refute the math, refute what the the witnesses said. He, He, you can't refute anything. That's why you don't reply and that why you hide in the shadows until this issue comes up later, hoping I will disappear.
I am famous for publishing that renowned piece of paper within the debunker world, but you could claim a Pulitzer prize for proving it wrong.
My chart is very clear. You need to come up with a concrete explanation for why it's wrong. You are failing miserably. Come on, rescue your reputation here. Everyone here thinks you are just another conspiracy theorists supporting a deluded theory. Why don't you prove them wrong?
Just to let you know that American 77 had time-replacement equipment serial and part numbers that can be traced right to the aircraft that struck the Pentagon, which of course, was American 77 and only a certain number of B-757-200 aircraft were built. You cannot switch aircraft because each aircraft have their own unique fingerprints that can be used to identify a particular aircraft even between aircraft of the same model. It would take me 30 minutes to identify a switched aircraft because I know what to look for.
To claim that no aircraft struck the Pentagon when there was aircraft wreckage spread everywhere with traceable serial and part numbers is absurd especially since radar tracked American 77 to its crash site at the Pentagon. Remember, a B-757 is not a stealth aircraft and even stealth aircraft are not totally invisible to radar.
Was watching some documentaries the other night and heard an air crash investigator make an interesting statement that some truthers like CE should take a moment to ponder:
When you look out the window of a terminal at the airport and you see a big beautiful 747--weighs 800,000 pounds and it can carry 500 people--and then you get out to an accident site and the biggest part of that airplane left is a rudder or maybe an engine.
CE--still waiting for you to respond to my post from three weeks ago re where in the video you provided you believe you can actually see the crash site in the building. A simple time stamp would suffice. Or you could just acknowledge that you cannot see it the video and you have not seen it elsewhere. It'll be a small step back towards reality, but a meaningful one.
No, I didn't miss them, it's just that these "parts" have been documented from all angles already. Nothing new there. Together with the scrap, they easily fit into the container that's burning here:
That's btw a typical misunderstanding of loud-mouthed but low-research "debunkers" in assessing the Pentagon situation, especially regarding the work of the CIT. If it hadn't be so obvious that no large passenger plane hit the Pentagon, this conclusive research would not have been triggered:
Conclusive? lol, CIT are idiots, that is not conclusive research, it was wild speculation based on massive ignorance in many fields. To have tunnel vision to a preconceived conclusion, and jump on failed recollection of a few witnesses is idiotic. It appears CIT had no clue where they were when they filmed some of the witnesses, who actually point to the real flight path, and mimic rocking of the wings as appears in the FDR. No big deal, I cheated, I was trained as an aircraft accident investigator, and find CIT's investigation to be a joke. CIT must of had no clue what direction the real flight path was as they filmed witnesses, and fooled you with BS.
YT evidence, big fail. Still gullible for CIT video of woo, exposing the worse investigators in history.
There were tons of debris from flight 77, and you never will have evidence to deny it. Except in a fantasy world where science is ignored.
The FDR, Radar, and DNA prove 77 impacted the Pentagon.
After 18 years, it is now your fault you can't comprehend the level of destruction of 77 due to the impact speed of 483.5 knots. With the energy of 1200 pound of TNT, 77 was destroyed at impact spreading thousand of parts along the impact path into the Pentagon, and ejecting parts around the point of impact. 77 became a kinetic energy weapon at impact. Most accident are at much slower speeds leaving much larger parts because the kinetic energy of the aircraft is around 150 pounds of TNT, 8 times less energy than the impact of 77. Why can't you do physics?
After 18 years, it is your fault you can't comprehend the damage to the Pentagon was due to 77's kinetic energy impact.
In 18 years you could have gained skills in physics/math/engineering to comprehend 77's impact. In 18 years you could have learned why people are poor witnesses and how to interpret their testimony. But you did not.
If you spent anytime going through the hundreds of Flight 77/Pentagon witnesses, you could have seen how the FDR, RADAR and DNA match their testimony, instead of forming failed conclusions you can't explain or take a stand on.
'
Why can't you comprehend the FDR, Radar, and DNA. 18 years of fantasy on your part and belief in unqualified CIT nuts who have witnesses pointing to the actual flight path of 77.
Thanks for the humous posts, as you deny reality and believe the worse investigators in history. How did they fool you into believing the FDR found in the Pentagon is fake?
Conclusive? lol, CIT are idiots, that is not conclusive research, it was wild speculation based on massive ignorance in many fields. To have tunnel vision to a preconceived conclusion, and jump on failed recollection of a few witnesses is idiotic. It appears CIT had no clue where they were when they filmed some of the witnesses, who actually point to the real flight path, and mimic rocking of the wings as appears in the FDR. No big deal, I cheated, I was trained as an aircraft accident investigator, and find CIT's investigation to be a joke. CIT must of had no clue what direction the real flight path was as they filmed witnesses, and fooled you with BS.
YT evidence, big fail. Still gullible for CIT video of woo, exposing the worse investigators in history.
There were tons of debris from flight 77, and you never will have evidence to deny it. Except in a fantasy world where science is ignored.
The FDR, Radar, and DNA prove 77 impacted the Pentagon.
After 18 years, it is now your fault you can't comprehend the level of destruction of 77 due to the impact speed of 483.5 knots. With the energy of 1200 pound of TNT, 77 was destroyed at impact spreading thousand of parts along the impact path into the Pentagon, and ejecting parts around the point of impact. 77 became a kinetic energy weapon at impact. Most accident are at much slower speeds leaving much larger parts because the kinetic energy of the aircraft is around 150 pounds of TNT, 8 times less energy than the impact of 77. Why can't you do physics?
After 18 years, it is your fault you can't comprehend the damage to the Pentagon was due to 77's kinetic energy impact.
In 18 years you could have gained skills in physics/math/engineering to comprehend 77's impact. In 18 years you could have learned why people are poor witnesses and how to interpret their testimony. But you did not.
If you spent anytime going through the hundreds of Flight 77/Pentagon witnesses, you could have seen how the FDR, RADAR and DNA match their testimony, instead of forming failed conclusions you can't explain or take a stand on.
'
Why can't you comprehend the FDR, Radar, and DNA. 18 years of fantasy on your part and belief in unqualified CIT nuts who have witnesses pointing to the actual flight path of 77.
Thanks for the humous posts, as you deny reality and believe the worse investigators in history. How did they fool you into believing the FDR found in the Pentagon is fake?
The second linked video is the one where I had indicated 699' AGL(time mark 4:44) and if that altitude was in the flight path indicated by the FDR. The mark says it is physically impossible to descend to almost ground level. Not sure if that is correct, but the video indicates that the engines "would have been scrapping the concrete as it impacted the building. They are making an assumption of vertical height without providing any evidence for it. I suspect that the plane was low but not that low and hit with the engines just above the ground.
The second linked video is the one where I had indicated 699' AGL(time mark 4:44) and if that altitude was in the flight path indicated by the FDR. The mark says it is physically impossible to descend to almost ground level. Not sure if that is correct, but the video indicates that the engines "would have been scrapping the concrete as it impacted the building. They are making an assumption of vertical height without providing any evidence for it. I suspect that the plane was low but not that low and hit with the engines just above the ground.
The last Radio Altimeter reading was 4 feet, and I think that is calibrated to be 4 feet above the ground for the landing gear down. (in the KC-135 a ground symbol would rise as we landed based on our RadAlt located on the bottom of the plane - the symbol would rise to our aircraft symbol on the ADI as the main wheels touched down)
In the past someone had estimated the position between the first and second floor where 77 nose impacted. I think one engine did hit something that was on the ground, but the engine was not on the ground.
669 ASL? Sign language? Think they meant pilot talk MSL, not ASL. I guess they want it to mean above sea level, is that high or low tide (okay, bad joke). The last seconds of Radio Altimeter give a read out from the ground.
The last 7 seconds of RadAlt. Final entry 4 feet, second before 57 feet, 89 feet, 183 feet, 233 feet, 273 feet, 352 feet. The 352 foot reading is about over terrain which is 150 MSL. This means at about 6 seconds out Flight 77 was about 500 feet.
Pilots for truth idiotic lies based on ignorance did not use the FDR final four seconds, and made up an altitude, and claim there was too much G-force, and also ignored the real flight path.
The 669 MSL altitude would have occurred more than 6 seconds out. By not using the last four seconds. At about 672-669 feet MSL, 77 was about 8 seconds out descending. Thus the PFLies left out four seconds and made false assumptions. Balsamo can't do physics, math, and more.
RadAlt measures the distance the aircraft is above the ground, AGL. The Pentagon sits at 35 feet MSL or so, the surrounding terrain rises on the reverse flight path from 80 feet to 200 feet MSL for the last 8 to 10 seconds of 77's flight.
The last Radio Altimeter reading was 4 feet, and I think that is calibrated to be 4 feet above the ground for the landing gear down. (in the KC-135 a ground symbol would rise as we landed based on our RadAlt located on the bottom of the plane - the symbol would rise to our aircraft symbol on the ADI as the main wheels touched down)
In the past someone had estimated the position between the first and second floor where 77 nose impacted. I think one engine did hit something that was on the ground, but the engine was not on the ground.
669 ASL? Sign language? Think they meant pilot talk MSL, not ASL. I guess they want it to mean above sea level, is that high or low tide (okay, bad joke). The last seconds of Radio Altimeter give a read out from the ground.
The last 7 seconds of RadAlt. Final entry 4 feet, second before 57 feet, 89 feet, 183 feet, 233 feet, 273 feet, 352 feet. The 352 foot reading is about over terrain which is 150 MSL. This means at about 6 seconds out Flight 77 was about 500 feet.
Pilots for truth idiotic lies based on ignorance did not use the FDR final four seconds, and made up an altitude, and claim there was too much G-force, and also ignored the real flight path.
The 669 MSL altitude would have occurred more than 6 seconds out. By not using the last four seconds. At about 672-669 feet MSL, 77 was about 8 seconds out descending. Thus the PFLies left out four seconds and made false assumptions. Balsamo can't do physics, math, and more.
RadAlt measures the distance the aircraft is above the ground, AGL. The Pentagon sits at 35 feet MSL or so, the surrounding terrain rises on the reverse flight path from 80 feet to 200 feet MSL for the last 8 to 10 seconds of 77's flight.
Fat finger entry that was supposed to be 699' AGL(but with those pilots that you mentioned it could have been MSL.
ETA:
I checked the video and it does indicated ASL Go figure what that pilot organization is talking about. Not being a pilot rather leaves me me behind the learning curve.
Fat finger entry that was supposed to be 699' AGL(but with those pilots that you mentioned it could have been MSL.
ETA:
I checked the video and it does indicated ASL Go figure what that pilot organization is talking about. Not being a pilot rather leaves me me behind the learning curve.
Fat finger entry that was supposed to be 699' AGL(but with those pilots that you mentioned it could have been MSL.
ETA:
I checked the video and it does indicated ASL Go figure what that pilot organization is talking about. Not being a pilot rather leaves me me behind the learning curve.
Pilots use AGL, above ground level, and MSL. ASL is a sign language to me. Non pilots might use Above Sea Level (ASL), or in propaganda videos trying to sell woo.
Pilots use AGL, above ground level, and MSL. ASL is a sign language to me. Non pilots might use Above Sea Level (ASL), or in propaganda videos trying to sell woo.
I love the idea of pilots using Above Sea Level. Landing in Denver, Johannesburg or Quito might be problematic. ("Looking good, Lonnie we're still still not at 5000 feet.... oh, *****!")
I love the idea of pilots using Above Sea Level. Landing in Denver, Johannesburg or Quito might be problematic. ("Looking good, Lonnie we're still still not at 5000 feet.... oh, *****!")
We use approach plates when in the weather and we can't see the ground. https://aeronav.faa.gov/d-tpp/1907/09077IL7.PDF
We set the current local altimeter, and after intercepting the glide slope, we go down to DH, decision height, and decide to land or go around. Plus, we have the Radio Altimeter going which gives altitude above the ground.
Plus, if you are on a 737 Max, and I see the trim moving on it's own, I use the trim to keep the plane from a nose down...
The last Radio Altimeter reading was 4 feet, and I think that is calibrated to be 4 feet above the ground for the landing gear down. (in the KC-135 a ground symbol would rise as we landed based on our RadAlt located on the bottom of the plane - the symbol would rise to our aircraft symbol on the ADI as the main wheels touched down)
In the past someone had estimated the position between the first and second floor where 77 nose impacted. I think one engine did hit something that was on the ground, but the engine was not on the ground.
669 ASL? Sign language? Think they meant pilot talk MSL, not ASL. I guess they want it to mean above sea level, is that high or low tide (okay, bad joke). The last seconds of Radio Altimeter give a read out from the ground.
The last 7 seconds of RadAlt. Final entry 4 feet, second before 57 feet, 89 feet, 183 feet, 233 feet, 273 feet, 352 feet. The 352 foot reading is about over terrain which is 150 MSL. This means at about 6 seconds out Flight 77 was about 500 feet.
Pilots for truth idiotic lies based on ignorance did not use the FDR final four seconds, and made up an altitude, and claim there was too much G-force, and also ignored the real flight path.
The 669 MSL altitude would have occurred more than 6 seconds out. By not using the last four seconds. At about 672-669 feet MSL, 77 was about 8 seconds out descending. Thus the PFLies left out four seconds and made false assumptions. Balsamo can't do physics, math, and more.
RadAlt measures the distance the aircraft is above the ground, AGL. The Pentagon sits at 35 feet MSL or so, the surrounding terrain rises on the reverse flight path from 80 feet to 200 feet MSL for the last 8 to 10 seconds of 77's flight.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
, but you could claim a Pulitzer prize for proving it wrong.
