ISF Logo   IS Forum
Forum Index Register Members List Events Mark Forums Read Help

Go Back   International Skeptics Forum » General Topics » Social Issues & Current Events
 


Welcome to the International Skeptics Forum, where we discuss skepticism, critical thinking, the paranormal and science in a friendly but lively way. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest, which means you are missing out on discussing matters that are of interest to you. Please consider registering so you can gain full use of the forum features and interact with other Members. Registration is simple, fast and free! Click here to register today.
Tags Jeffrey Epstein , sex offenders , sex trafficking

Reply
Old 7th July 2019, 05:16 AM   #1
applecorped
Suspended
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 19,621
Jeffrey Epstein arrested for child sex trafficking

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/crime...ged/ar-AADX7RQ


Billionaire financier and registered sex offender Jeffrey Epstein was arrested Saturday in New York on new sex-trafficking charges involving allegations that date to the early 2000s, according to law enforcement officials.
An official said Epstein is accused of paying underage girls for massages and molesting them at his homes in Florida and New York.
The arrest comes amid renewed scrutiny of a once-secret plea deal that ended a federal investigation against him.
applecorped is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 7th July 2019, 08:25 AM   #2
Darat
Lackey
Administrator
 
Darat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: South East, UK
Posts: 86,759
Even what he has admitted to makes him scum. I'll not be at all surprised if these new charges end in a successful prosecution. He's a prime example of how wealth and the influence it can bring can distort a justice system.
__________________
I wish I knew how to quit you
Darat is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 7th July 2019, 09:09 AM   #3
Trebuchet
Penultimate Amazing
 
Trebuchet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: The Great Northwet
Posts: 22,193
Is this new activity since the previous charges, or just stuff he didn't get charged with before?
__________________
Cum catapultae proscribeantur tum soli proscripti catapultas habeant.
Trebuchet is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 7th July 2019, 09:22 AM   #4
crescent
Illuminator
 
crescent's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 3,053
Originally Posted by Trebuchet View Post
Is this new activity since the previous charges, or just stuff he didn't get charged with before?
The indictment is sealed. But this may be related to a recent court decision that was critical of the plea deal he got a decade ago.

Wealthy financier Jeffrey Epstein arrested for sex trafficking, sources say

Quote:
Earlier this year, a federal judge ruled that the deal did, in fact, violate the rights of Epstein’s victims. The court is now considering the possible remedies for the violation of the law.

"If today’s report is true, it only proves that the Epstein should have been charged by federal prosecutors twelve years ago in Florida," Paul Cassell, co-counsel along with Edwards for victims Jane Doe 1 and 2 in the case challenging the DOJ over the non-prosecution agreement with Epstein, said in a statement. "With his money, Epstein was able to buy more than a decade of delay in facing justice – but fortunately he wasn’t able to postpone justice forever."
I'm not sure how a not-quite-kosher plea deal applies to double jeopardy. Or how any of that works. If the plea deal was not done right, can the original guilty plea be considered void and the whole prosecution started over?
crescent is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 7th July 2019, 09:36 AM   #5
shemp
a flimsy character...perfidious and despised
 
shemp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: People's Democratic Republic of Planet X
Posts: 31,110
These must be cases that were not involved in the previous plea deal. Perhaps they were not even known at the time. A plea deal is not blanket coverage for all past transgressions.
__________________
"Shemp, you are the one fixed point in an ever-changing universe." - Beady
"I don't want to live in a world without shemp." - Quarky
"Real name? Xavier Jorge Gladdius Horatio McShrimp. No wonder he goes by shemp." - wasapi
"...just as a magnet attracts iron filings, Trump shemp attracts, and is attracted to, louts." - George Will
shemp is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 7th July 2019, 10:32 AM   #6
Trebuchet
Penultimate Amazing
 
Trebuchet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: The Great Northwet
Posts: 22,193
I find myself hoping Trump will pardon him, but he's not quite THAT dumb. Unless Epstein has something on Trump, which is possible.
__________________
Cum catapultae proscribeantur tum soli proscripti catapultas habeant.
Trebuchet is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 7th July 2019, 11:08 AM   #7
Ranb
Philosopher
 
Ranb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: WA USA
Posts: 9,833
Well, Epstein is or was a Trump buddy.
Quote:
“I’ve known Jeff for fifteen years. Terrific guy. He’s a lot of fun to be with. It is even said that he likes beautiful women as much as I do, and many of them are on the younger side.” - Donald Trump, 2002 https://t.co/3pbKrcFdn6

Or maybe Epstein will get another good deal from someone like Alexander Acosta.
https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2019...tein-plea-deal
Quote:
Alexander Acosta who, following a three-part investigation by the *Miami Herald, was found on Thursday to have broken the law when he and other prosecutors let Jeffrey Epstein, who was literally running an international sex operation that included underaged girls, sign a plea agreement and conceal it from more than 30 victims. Rather than prosecuting the billionaire under federal sex trafficking laws, Acosta, then the U.S. attorney in Miami, negotiated “a non-prosecution agreement that gave Epstein and his co-conspirators immunity” and allowed him to quietly plead guilty to just two prostitution charges in state court, and serve less than 18 months in a county jail.
Ranb
Ranb is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 7th July 2019, 11:14 AM   #8
crescent
Illuminator
 
crescent's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 3,053
Originally Posted by Ranb View Post
Well, Epstein is or was a Trump buddy.
He's also a Bill Clinton buddy. He's one of those people with ties to all sorts of powerful people on both sides of a the aisle. Or, at least, he HAD all sorts of ties.

I guess the one catch is that most of his Democratic friends are pretty much out of the picture. Whereas the problematic plea deal was done by a Republican who is in the current administration and the current president was also friend.

I don't expect to see any functional political effect from this. Any ties to Trump will be deflected by bringing up ties to Bill Clinton. Never mind that one is still President and is looking to run for re-election while the other is less politically influential than ever.
crescent is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 7th July 2019, 12:12 PM   #9
cow_cat
Mr. Parodied
 
cow_cat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Between the Sun and the Stars
Posts: 1,631
So, it's like pizzagate, but real?
__________________
Now that is Scientific Fact. There's no real evidence for it, but it is Scientific Fact.
-'Dr' Neil Fox, speaking on brasseye

Used to have another username, but I hated it.
cow_cat is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 7th July 2019, 12:30 PM   #10
BobTheCoward
Penultimate Amazing
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 17,169
What Constitutional rights do victims have that are applicable in this case?
BobTheCoward is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 7th July 2019, 01:03 PM   #11
CaptainHowdy
Graduate Poster
 
CaptainHowdy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 1,272
Originally Posted by crescent View Post
He's also a Bill Clinton buddy. He's one of those people with ties to all sorts of powerful people on both sides of a the aisle. Or, at least, he HAD all sorts of ties.

I guess the one catch is that most of his Democratic friends are pretty much out of the picture. Whereas the problematic plea deal was done by a Republican who is in the current administration and the current president was also friend.

I don't expect to see any functional political effect from this. Any ties to Trump will be deflected by bringing up ties to Bill Clinton. Never mind that one is still President and is looking to run for re-election while the other is less politically influential than ever.
Epstein's connection to Donald Trump and Bill Clinton kept his (Epstein) name off the agenda in 2016. Neither candidate could really use it against the other. It's now 2020 election time and none of the Democratic candidates have the connection to Epstein. This could create some difficulties for Trump but I don't think it's fatal.

Going to trial could prove to be embarrassing for some of the people who are connected to Epstein, Dershowitz and Prince Andrew among others
CaptainHowdy is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 7th July 2019, 01:07 PM   #12
CaptainHowdy
Graduate Poster
 
CaptainHowdy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 1,272
Miami Herald ran an expose of Epstein last year that was pretty exhaustive
CaptainHowdy is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 7th July 2019, 01:10 PM   #13
Tero
Graduate Poster
 
Tero's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: North American prairie
Posts: 1,557
Originally Posted by Trebuchet View Post
I find myself hoping Trump will pardon him, but he's not quite THAT dumb. Unless Epstein has something on Trump, which is possible.
Trump pardons E. Pence pardons Trump.
Tero is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 7th July 2019, 02:03 PM   #14
smartcooky
Penultimate Amazing
 
smartcooky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Nelson, New Zealand
Posts: 12,198
Originally Posted by crescent View Post
The indictment is sealed. But this may be related to a recent court decision that was critical of the plea deal he got a decade ago.

Wealthy financier Jeffrey Epstein arrested for sex trafficking, sources say



I'm not sure how a not-quite-kosher plea deal applies to double jeopardy. Or how any of that works. If the plea deal was not done right, can the original guilty plea be considered void and the whole prosecution started over?
Double Jeopardy only applies if jeopardy has attached. I don't think that routinely happens with a plea deal.

Remember also, that a judge has ruled that Acosta broke the law in negotiating that plea deal, so the deal might well be void.
__________________
“Give me your tired, your poor, your huddled masses yearning to breathe free, the wretched refuse of your teeming shore - if they're white!"
If you don't like my posts, my opinions, or my directness then put me on your ignore list.
This will be of benefit to both of us; you won't have to take umbrage at my posts, and I won't have to waste my time talking to you... simples! !
smartcooky is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 7th July 2019, 02:08 PM   #15
smartcooky
Penultimate Amazing
 
smartcooky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Nelson, New Zealand
Posts: 12,198
Also, the fact that it is a sealed indictment is very interesting. It could mean that there is someone else named in the indictment that the prosecutors don't want mentioned in public.
__________________
“Give me your tired, your poor, your huddled masses yearning to breathe free, the wretched refuse of your teeming shore - if they're white!"
If you don't like my posts, my opinions, or my directness then put me on your ignore list.
This will be of benefit to both of us; you won't have to take umbrage at my posts, and I won't have to waste my time talking to you... simples! !
smartcooky is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 7th July 2019, 02:47 PM   #16
theprestige
Penultimate Amazing
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 36,814
Originally Posted by Trebuchet View Post
I find myself hoping Trump will pardon him, but he's not quite THAT dumb. Unless Epstein has something on Trump, which is possible.
Possible, but unlikely. If Epstein had something on him, Trump would have said so by now.
theprestige is online now   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 7th July 2019, 03:12 PM   #17
Childlike Empress
Ewige Blumenkraft
 
Childlike Empress's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Ivory Tower
Posts: 17,150
Originally Posted by smartcooky View Post
Also, the fact that it is a sealed indictment is very interesting. It could mean that there is someone else named in the indictment that the prosecutors don't want mentioned in public.

The Daily Beast has an "exclusive" on this and claims that the indictment will be unsealed tomorrow and that the FBI will ask for more victims to come forward.
__________________
Audiatur et altera pars
Childlike Empress is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 7th July 2019, 03:34 PM   #18
Skeptic Ginger
Nasty Woman
 
Skeptic Ginger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 75,037
Originally Posted by theprestige View Post
Possible, but unlikely. If Epstein had something on him, Trump would have said so by now.
WTF nonsense is this?
__________________
That new avatar is cuteness overload.
Restore checks and balances no matter your party affiliation.
Skeptic Ginger is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 7th July 2019, 03:40 PM   #19
theprestige
Penultimate Amazing
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 36,814
Originally Posted by Skeptic Ginger View Post
WTF nonsense is this?
???

You don't think Trump would tweet incontinently about whatever scandal he was embroiled in?

In which he was embroiled?
theprestige is online now   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 7th July 2019, 04:39 PM   #20
Faydra
sinning sybarite
 
Faydra's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 6,484
This will be interesting. The cesspool of Twitter is beside itself about who Epstein will bring down with him.

I don't care what political side they are on, if they are involved in this they should go to jail.
Faydra is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 7th July 2019, 05:56 PM   #21
Ziggurat
Penultimate Amazing
 
Ziggurat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 43,793
Originally Posted by Darat View Post
Even what he has admitted to makes him scum. I'll not be at all surprised if these new charges end in a successful prosecution. He's a prime example of how wealth and the influence it can bring can distort a justice system.
Influence protects you, until it doesn't. There's a tipping point at which the people you rely on for protection decide that they're better off not protecting you. And since those calculations are coupled (you don't want to be the last person protecting someone who's going down anyways), the collapse of influence can be sudden and complete.
__________________
"As long as it is admitted that the law may be diverted from its true purpose -- that it may violate property instead of protecting it -- then everyone will want to participate in making the law, either to protect himself against plunder or to use it for plunder. Political questions will always be prejudicial, dominant, and all-absorbing. There will be fighting at the door of the Legislative Palace, and the struggle within will be no less furious." - Bastiat, The Law
Ziggurat is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 7th July 2019, 06:02 PM   #22
Trebuchet
Penultimate Amazing
 
Trebuchet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: The Great Northwet
Posts: 22,193
Originally Posted by Faydra View Post
This will be interesting. The cesspool of Twitter is beside itself about who Epstein will bring down with him.

I don't care what political side they are on, if they are involved in this they should go to jail.
I'm voting for Dershowitz.
__________________
Cum catapultae proscribeantur tum soli proscripti catapultas habeant.
Trebuchet is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 7th July 2019, 06:07 PM   #23
Skeptic Ginger
Nasty Woman
 
Skeptic Ginger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 75,037
Originally Posted by theprestige View Post
???

You don't think Trump would tweet incontinently about whatever scandal he was embroiled in?

In which he was embroiled?
"Trump would have said so by now"

He's admitted being on Epstein's plane, but you are suggesting Trump would have said he poked 13 yr olds? He denied that multiple times.
__________________
That new avatar is cuteness overload.
Restore checks and balances no matter your party affiliation.

Last edited by Skeptic Ginger; 7th July 2019 at 06:10 PM.
Skeptic Ginger is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 7th July 2019, 06:30 PM   #24
Ziggurat
Penultimate Amazing
 
Ziggurat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 43,793
Originally Posted by Skeptic Ginger View Post
"Trump would have said so by now"

He's admitted being on Epstein's plane, but you are suggesting Trump would have said he poked 13 yr olds? He denied that multiple times.
I think he's saying Trump would have tweeted something about the charges if he felt Epstein might turn on him with actually damaging info. Maybe complained that Epstein is being railroaded, or that it's just an attempt to get to Trump, or something. The point is that silence isn't Trump's style for anything he cares about. So either he doesn't care, or he's taking a different approach than his usual one.
__________________
"As long as it is admitted that the law may be diverted from its true purpose -- that it may violate property instead of protecting it -- then everyone will want to participate in making the law, either to protect himself against plunder or to use it for plunder. Political questions will always be prejudicial, dominant, and all-absorbing. There will be fighting at the door of the Legislative Palace, and the struggle within will be no less furious." - Bastiat, The Law
Ziggurat is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 7th July 2019, 08:38 PM   #25
Puppycow
Penultimate Amazing
 
Puppycow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 23,658
Originally Posted by smartcooky View Post
Also, the fact that it is a sealed indictment is very interesting. It could mean that there is someone else named in the indictment that the prosecutors don't want mentioned in public.
Is the indictment supposed to be unsealed on Monday? I think I read that somewhere. That would mean soon. Within the next 24 hours.

Some rich and powerful men are 'sweating it out’ ahead of indictment against registered sex offender Jeffrey Epstein: journalist (New York Daily News)

OK, not the most sober and reliable of sources, but worth a read here.

Quote:
Last week an appeals court ordered the release of a 2,000-page document linked to the Epstein case be unsealed, ruling that the public’s right of access to court papers overrides the privacy concerns of certain individuals. The 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals decision references allegations of sexual abuse involving "numerous prominent American politicians, powerful business executives, foreign presidents, a well-known Prime Minister, and other world leaders."
Key word here is "allegations" though.
__________________
A fool thinks himself to be wise, but a wise man knows himself to be a fool.
William Shakespeare
Puppycow is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 7th July 2019, 09:25 PM   #26
smartcooky
Penultimate Amazing
 
smartcooky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Nelson, New Zealand
Posts: 12,198
Originally Posted by theprestige View Post
???

You don't think Trump would tweet incontinently about whatever scandal he was embroiled in?

In which he was embroiled?
Originally Posted by Ziggurat View Post
I think he's saying Trump would have tweeted something about the charges if he felt Epstein might turn on him with actually damaging info. Maybe complained that Epstein is being railroaded, or that it's just an attempt to get to Trump, or something. The point is that silence isn't Trump's style for anything he cares about. So either he doesn't care, or he's taking a different approach than his usual one.

If I understand what you are saying here, then I agree with both of you (and ain't that a thing).

Firstly, much as I despise Trump for his womanizing and his misogynistic attitude, I seriously doubt that he would be a kiddie fiddler. I know he likes them young, but I doubt he likes them that young.

Second, if I'm wrong about that, and he really is involved, he would already have undertaken a twitter rage campaign accusing "them Ebil Dems" of concocting a hoax and a witch hunt, reciting "no involvement".

He is so predictable... we all know what he does and how he acts when he is guilty of something, we can read him like a book!
__________________
“Give me your tired, your poor, your huddled masses yearning to breathe free, the wretched refuse of your teeming shore - if they're white!"
If you don't like my posts, my opinions, or my directness then put me on your ignore list.
This will be of benefit to both of us; you won't have to take umbrage at my posts, and I won't have to waste my time talking to you... simples! !

Last edited by smartcooky; 7th July 2019 at 09:26 PM.
smartcooky is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 7th July 2019, 09:30 PM   #27
Skeptic Ginger
Nasty Woman
 
Skeptic Ginger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 75,037
Originally Posted by Ziggurat View Post
I think he's saying Trump would have tweeted something about the charges if he felt Epstein might turn on him with actually damaging info. Maybe complained that Epstein is being railroaded, or that it's just an attempt to get to Trump, or something. The point is that silence isn't Trump's style for anything he cares about. So either he doesn't care, or he's taking a different approach than his usual one.
Too much imaginary tea leaf reading for my book.
__________________
That new avatar is cuteness overload.
Restore checks and balances no matter your party affiliation.
Skeptic Ginger is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 7th July 2019, 09:42 PM   #28
The Great Zaganza
Maledictorian
 
The Great Zaganza's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Posts: 8,901
I doubt the FBI would have gone forward if there was an unmistakable criminal connection between Epstein and Trump.

But there are plenty of connections between Epstein and people working, directly or indirectly, for Trump, like Dershowitz and Acosta.

Trump just doesn't who to throw under the bus yet to keep himself looking unconnected.
__________________
Careful! That tree's bark is worse than its bite.
The Great Zaganza is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 7th July 2019, 09:53 PM   #29
Puppycow
Penultimate Amazing
 
Puppycow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 23,658
I'm gonna agree with Skeptic Ginger on this one. Not much point in speculating until the documents are unsealed. Trump would be foolish to deny something he hasn't even been publicly accused of yet, and I don't think he's that foolish.
__________________
A fool thinks himself to be wise, but a wise man knows himself to be a fool.
William Shakespeare
Puppycow is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 7th July 2019, 10:12 PM   #30
The Great Zaganza
Maledictorian
 
The Great Zaganza's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Posts: 8,901
Originally Posted by Puppycow View Post
I'm gonna agree with Skeptic Ginger on this one. Not much point in speculating until the documents are unsealed. Trump would be foolish to deny something he hasn't even been publicly accused of yet, and I don't think he's that foolish.
... never stopped him before ...
__________________
Careful! That tree's bark is worse than its bite.
The Great Zaganza is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 7th July 2019, 11:16 PM   #31
dann
Philosopher
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 8,266
Originally Posted by Skeptic Ginger View Post
"Trump would have said so by now"

He's admitted being on Epstein's plane, but you are suggesting Trump would have said he poked 13 yr olds? He denied that multiple times.

All you need is a headline saying that Trump is much too ugly and unattractive for an underage girl to want to have anything to do with him, and he'll post the photos to prove you wrong!
__________________
/dann
"Stupidity renders itself invisible by assuming very large proportions. Completely unreasonable claims are irrefutable. Ni-en-leh pointed out that a philosopher might get into trouble by claiming that two times two makes five, but he does not risk much by claiming that two times two makes shoe polish." B. Brecht
"The abolition of religion as the illusory happiness of the people is required for their real happiness. The demand to give up the illusion about its condition is the demand to give up a condition which needs illusions." K. Marx
dann is online now   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 8th July 2019, 09:25 AM   #32
BobTheCoward
Penultimate Amazing
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 17,169
The most important discussion is going to be pointing out that Epstein is not a pedophile.
BobTheCoward is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 8th July 2019, 09:28 AM   #33
The Great Zaganza
Maledictorian
 
The Great Zaganza's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Posts: 8,901
Originally Posted by BobTheCoward View Post
The most important discussion is going to be pointing out that Epstein is not a pedophile.
given that Pedophilia is not a legal term, it isn't important at all.
__________________
Careful! That tree's bark is worse than its bite.
The Great Zaganza is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 8th July 2019, 09:34 AM   #34
Skeptic Ginger
Nasty Woman
 
Skeptic Ginger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 75,037
Originally Posted by The Great Zaganza View Post
... never stopped him before ...
He's selective what he is foolish about. He has issues when he's accused of anything with women that suggests he had to force them to get it. I think that includes sex with teenyboppers.
__________________
That new avatar is cuteness overload.
Restore checks and balances no matter your party affiliation.

Last edited by Skeptic Ginger; 8th July 2019 at 09:36 AM.
Skeptic Ginger is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 8th July 2019, 09:48 AM   #35
carlitos
"más divertido"
 
carlitos's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 20,429
Originally Posted by cow_cat View Post
So, it's like pizzagate, but real?
I'm going to avoid the pedantic discussion, but the Pizzagate people, like most satanic panic conspiracy theorists, believed that young children of both genders were being victimized. Not high school girls.
carlitos is online now   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 8th July 2019, 09:53 AM   #36
JoeMorgue
Self Employed
Remittance Man
 
JoeMorgue's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Florida
Posts: 19,410
Originally Posted by BobTheCoward View Post
The most important discussion is going to be pointing out that Epstein is not a pedophile.
You're literally the first person in this thread to use the term "pedophile."
__________________
- "Ernest Hemingway once wrote that the world is a fine place and worth fighting for. I agree with the second part." - Detective Sommerset
- "Stupidity does not cancel out stupidity to yield genius. It breeds like a bucket-full of coked out hamsters." - The Oatmeal
- "To the best of my knowledge the only thing philosophy has ever proven is that Descartes could think." - SMBC
JoeMorgue is online now   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 8th July 2019, 09:56 AM   #37
BobTheCoward
Penultimate Amazing
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 17,169
Originally Posted by JoeMorgue View Post
You're literally the first person in this thread to use the term "pedophile."
I didn't claim it was related to discussion here Bloomberg, the NY post , daily mail, and others have all used the term. Calling it important was tongue and cheek, but I think the pedantic discussion is on its way.
BobTheCoward is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 8th July 2019, 09:59 AM   #38
JoeMorgue
Self Employed
Remittance Man
 
JoeMorgue's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Florida
Posts: 19,410
Originally Posted by BobTheCoward View Post
I didn't claim it was related to discussion here Bloomberg, the NY post , daily mail, and others have all used the term. Calling it important was tongue and cheek, but I think the pedantic discussion is on its way.
Yeah because you intend to start it.

"Pedantic Discussions" aren't naturally occurring phenomenon. They are started by pedants. Pedants like you.
__________________
- "Ernest Hemingway once wrote that the world is a fine place and worth fighting for. I agree with the second part." - Detective Sommerset
- "Stupidity does not cancel out stupidity to yield genius. It breeds like a bucket-full of coked out hamsters." - The Oatmeal
- "To the best of my knowledge the only thing philosophy has ever proven is that Descartes could think." - SMBC
JoeMorgue is online now   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 8th July 2019, 10:05 AM   #39
autumn1971
Master Poster
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 2,798
Originally Posted by dann View Post
All you need is a headline saying that Trump is much too ugly and unattractive for an underage girl to want to have anything to do with him, and he'll post the photos to prove you wrong!
Oh, one can only wish!

“I don’t like thirteen-year-olds, they had to be fourteen to compete in my pageant!”
__________________
'A knave; a rascal; an eater of broken meats; a base, proud, shallow, beggardly, three-suited, hundred-pound, filthy, worsted-stocking knave; a lily-livered, action-taking knave, a whoreson, glass-gazing, superservicable, finical rogue;... the son and heir of a mongral bitch: one whom I will beat into clamorous whining, if thou deniest the least syllable of thy addition."'
-The Bard
autumn1971 is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 8th July 2019, 10:08 AM   #40
Ziggurat
Penultimate Amazing
 
Ziggurat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 43,793
I read through the indictment. What I can't tell from it is how it relates to his previous charges. In particular, is this a completely separate group of victims from the ones he was charge with abusing before? That would make sense, in terms of not having to deal with the previous plea or with double jeopardy, but the indictment itself makes no mention of the previous deal so there's still some ambiguity, at least for those who haven't closely followed this horror show.
__________________
"As long as it is admitted that the law may be diverted from its true purpose -- that it may violate property instead of protecting it -- then everyone will want to participate in making the law, either to protect himself against plunder or to use it for plunder. Political questions will always be prejudicial, dominant, and all-absorbing. There will be fighting at the door of the Legislative Palace, and the struggle within will be no less furious." - Bastiat, The Law
Ziggurat is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Reply

International Skeptics Forum » General Topics » Social Issues & Current Events

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:02 AM.
Powered by vBulletin. Copyright ©2000 - 2019, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This forum began as part of the James Randi Education Foundation (JREF). However, the forum now exists as
an independent entity with no affiliation with or endorsement by the JREF, including the section in reference to "JREF" topics.

Disclaimer: Messages posted in the Forum are solely the opinion of their authors.