Any Updates on Mark Basile's Study?

bknight said:
FTFY, There are many who still believe that some nefarious organization pulled off the demolition of W7, perhaps a dwindling number. The facts are clear, Damage from W1 and unchecked fires brought the house down, really simple.
Click to expand...


It's surprising how many claim "nothing" hit WTC7 , focused on planes. Many don't know hundreds of tons of steel and concrete rained down on WTC7.

But that's conspiracy theorists.
 
cantonear1968 said:
It's surprising how many claim "nothing" hit WTC7 , focused on planes. Many don't know hundreds of tons of steel and concrete rained down on WTC7.

But that's conspiracy theorists.
Click to expand...

Most seem unaware of the basics - possibly genuinely. Steel frames are vulnerable to fire and their design - esp high rise - is an economic compromise - risk managed and relying on active fire fighting. Hence the 'fire rating' expressed in hours - which gives time for occupant escape and commencement of necessary active fire fighting.

And the occupants had escaped WTC7 - primary objective met.
 
ozeco41 said:
Most seem unaware of the basics - possibly genuinely. Steel frames are vulnerable to fire and their design - esp high rise - is an economic compromise - risk managed and relying on active fire fighting. Hence the 'fire rating' expressed in hours - which gives time for occupant escape and commencement of necessary active fire fighting.

And the occupants had escaped WTC7 - primary objective met.
Click to expand...

Of course the objective to save the building and prevent damage to neighboring properties is an objective as well and shouldn't be ignored.
 
DGM said:
I doubt he's "hiding" or even thinking about this phase of his life. Outside of this site........no one seems to care.
Click to expand...


Seconded. Mark Basile has most likely forgotten about this long ago.

The people he scammed took money from.......

....another story.
 
Why is anyone still focused on this? The study clearly won't be released. Get over it.

In other news, there is a study that was just released. I wonder why the reality deniers don't want to talk about that.

Come on reality deniers. Come out of the woodwork again. It's time to expose you all for the frauds that you are.
 
no evidence from 9/11 truth for nearly 20 years

PhotoMatt said:
Why is anyone still focused on this? The study clearly won't be released. Get over it.
Click to expand...
9/11 was solved on 9/11, Get over it. Your fantasy version of 9/11, which you can't explain, failed. Get over it.

It takes a few seconds to add up the months Mark's Study is late.
It appears you know the "real" story of 9/11, but can't prove it, and you took a year off and failed to make progress, the same as Mark's study of woo.

PhotoMatt said:
In other news, there is a study that was just released. I wonder why the reality deniers don't want to talk about that.
Click to expand...
Again you like to project. You are the reality denier, and you don't have a clue you are the reality denier, as you blindly believe the fantasy claims of CD from Gage and his scam of CD.

You can't name who did 9/11, you can't prove CD, projecting your reality denial on others. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Psychological_projection

PhotoMatt said:
Come on reality deniers. Come out of the woodwork again. It's time to expose you all for the frauds that you are.
Click to expand...
Oops, double projection.

You can't present evidence for CD, that is fraud.

Is this another 7 day presentation of BS, and then you go away for a year after failing to present reality based evidence.

How much hearsay do you have this time? 7 days worth, or what? A lot of "or what".
 
PhotoMatt said:
Why is anyone still focused on this? The study clearly won't be released. Get over it. ...
Click to expand...

We are quite comfortable with Basile failing to back up the Harrit/Steven Jones hoax.

Basile isn't all that bad.
He presented a bit of data more than 10 years ago, when he showed how a particular red/gray chip from the same WTC dust source that Steven Jones originally used, burned "vigorously" upon being heated to an undefined temperature.
And THEN he also showed data, for the very self-same red/gray chip, which proved it contains less than 1.7% aluminium. This result alone means that the "vigorous" burning, the observed heat release, cannot possibly be the result of a thermite reaction.

Basile debunked "nanothermite" 10 years ago. He just didn't understand it.

I personally believe he finally came around to understanding that the chips are really just paint, and was too ashamed to admit it, so he quietly disappeared.

Anyway, the thermite hoax is debunked. Has been debunked for many many years.

Get over it.
 
Oystein said:
Basile debunked "nanothermite" 10 years ago. He just didn't understand it.

I personally believe he finally came around to understanding that the chips are really just paint, and was too ashamed to admit it, so he quietly disappeared.

Anyway, the thermite hoax is debunked. Has been debunked for many many years.

Get over it.
Click to expand...
Fully agreed. ThermXte is comprehensively debunked and there is no purpose served by trying to resurect it.

And my favourite observation. The topic of thermXte (any variant) is only of interest in the context of CD. And there was no CD. So even if there had been 100 tonne stockpiles of thermXte at Ground Zero the issue is moot - irrelevant - until and unless someone proves CD. Which ain't gunna happen anytime soon .
 
ergo said:
Absolutely right. 9/11 bedunkers are obsessed with truther fundraising.

Few/slow donations = "pathetic", "lack of support", "fringe cause"

Increased/fast donations = "gullible truthers", "Dicky Gage's vacation fund", "SCAM!!1!"

That's the level of "analysis" we find here. :D
Click to expand...

It looks like the analysis was correct.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom