ISF Logo   IS Forum
Forum Index Register Members List Events Mark Forums Read Help

Go Back   International Skeptics Forum » General Topics » Social Issues & Current Events
 


Welcome to the International Skeptics Forum, where we discuss skepticism, critical thinking, the paranormal and science in a friendly but lively way. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest, which means you are missing out on discussing matters that are of interest to you. Please consider registering so you can gain full use of the forum features and interact with other Members. Registration is simple, fast and free! Click here to register today.
Reply
Old 29th August 2019, 04:22 PM   #1
That19Guy
Scholar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 116
The 'Gay Gene' Is a Total Myth, Massive Study Concludes

Sorry bout it but you weren't "Born This Way"


Quote:
No individual gene alone makes a person gay, lesbian or bisexual; instead, thousands of genes likely influence sexual orientation, a massive new study of the genomes of nearly half a million people suggests.

Across human societies and in both sexes, between 2% and 10% of people report engaging in sex with a member of the same sex, either exclusively or in addition to sex with a member of the opposite sex, the researchers said. The biological factors that contribute to sexual orientation are largely unknown, but many scientists suspect that genetics plays a role, given that same-sex sexual behavior appears to run in families and is seen more often in identical twins than in fraternal twins.

But a precise genetic basis for sexual orientation has been elusive, largely because scientists previously had relatively small groups of volunteers to investigate.

Edited by zooterkin:  <SNIP>
Edited for rule 4.
https://www.livescience.com/no-singl...meone-gay.html

Not at all surprised. The end result of homosexuality produces a repeatable outcome.

Disease.

On a grand scale. And yet we have people arguing for the growth of that and the promulgation of it.

Last edited by Darat; 30th August 2019 at 10:57 AM. Reason: Corrected quote tag
That19Guy is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 29th August 2019, 04:45 PM   #2
Max_mang
Critical Thinker
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 363
Originally Posted by That19Guy View Post
https://www.livescience.com/no-singl...meone-gay.html

Not at all surprised. The end result of homosexuality produces a repeatable outcome.

Disease.

On a grand scale. And yet we have people arguing for the growth of that and the promulgation of it.
Whoa, who's on the who what now?

Last edited by Max_mang; 29th August 2019 at 04:51 PM.
Max_mang is online now   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 29th August 2019, 04:57 PM   #3
RecoveringYuppy
Philosopher
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 9,332
Please note that the first sentence of the "quote" cited by That19Guy is not a quote. Also note that that sentence is contradicted by the actual quote (even by the first sentence of the real quote FFS). And That91Guy's conclusions are not at all supported by the study.
__________________
REJ (Robert E Jones) posting anonymously under my real name for 30 years.

Make a fire for a man and you keep him warm for a day. Set him on fire and you keep him warm for the rest of his life.

Last edited by RecoveringYuppy; 29th August 2019 at 05:23 PM.
RecoveringYuppy is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 29th August 2019, 05:06 PM   #4
fromdownunder
Philosopher
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 6,483
Originally Posted by RecoveringYuppy View Post
Please note that the first sentence of the "quote" cited by That91Guy is not a quote.

Yes, he made that bit up out of whole cloth.
Edited by kmortis:  Removed to comply with Rule 12



Norm
__________________
Against stupidity, the Gods themselves contend in Vain



Last edited by kmortis; 30th August 2019 at 04:40 AM.
fromdownunder is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 29th August 2019, 05:14 PM   #5
angrysoba
Philosophile
 
angrysoba's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Osaka, Japan
Posts: 25,834
Originally Posted by That19Guy View Post
https://www.livescience.com/no-singl...meone-gay.html

Not at all surprised. The end result of homosexuality produces a repeatable outcome.

Disease.

On a grand scale. And yet we have people arguing for the growth of that and the promulgation of it.
No, homosexuality makes the baby Jesus cry. Get it right.

Dumbest OP in a while. Poster inserts his own bit of editorializing trying to pass it off as part of the quoted article when all the article says is there is not one specific gene but a number of genes that play a role in someone’s sexuality.
__________________
"The thief and the murderer follow nature just as much as the philanthropist. Cosmic evolution may teach us how the good and the evil tendencies of man may have come about; but, in itself, it is incompetent to furnish any better reason why what we call good is preferable to what we call evil than we had before."

"Evolution and Ethics" T.H. Huxley (1893)
angrysoba is online now   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 29th August 2019, 05:25 PM   #6
Robin
Penultimate Amazing
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 10,906
Quote:
No individual gene alone makes a person gay, lesbian or bisexual; instead, thousands of genes likely influence sexual orientation, a massive new study of the genomes of nearly half a million people suggests.
is there anyone, anywhere, ever who suggested it was just one gene????

And how do you get from that to "you weren't born this way "?
__________________
The non-theoretical character of metaphysics would not be in itself a defect; all arts have this non-theoretical character without thereby losing their high value for personal as well as for social life. The danger lies in the deceptive character of metaphysics; it gives the illusion of knowledge without actually giving any knowledge. This is the reason why we reject it. - Rudolf Carnap "Philosophy and Logical Syntax"
Robin is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 29th August 2019, 05:32 PM   #7
That19Guy
Scholar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 116
Originally Posted by angrysoba View Post
No, homosexuality makes the baby Jesus cry. Get it right.

Dumbest OP in a while. Poster inserts his own bit of editorializing trying to pass it off as part of the quoted article when all the article says is there is not one specific gene but a number of genes that play a role in someone’s sexuality.
Au contraire

DNA evolves as you age... I'll spare you all the details since y'all should know this by now but if you dont know here's a very basic intro article to it called:

" YOUR DNA CHANGES AS YOU AGE"
https://gizmodo.com/your-dna-changes-as-you-age-5917672


Connect the dots...but what exactly changes your DNA? What helps it evolve and change?

hmmmmmm


environment?


Yeah that was easy.

Here's some Science supporting that too. This one's called:

ENVIRONMENTAL INFLUENCES ON GENE EXPRESSION

https://www.nature.com/scitable/topi...xpression-536/


So like many people have known for years, folk become who they become because of the world around them, not the world within them.

I know it's not what you wanted it to be but it is what it is
That19Guy is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 29th August 2019, 05:41 PM   #8
Robin
Penultimate Amazing
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 10,906
If gays weren't born this way, it kind of implies that heterosexuals weren't born that way either.

I am always intrigued to hear the details of people who didn't have any natural sexual attraction to either sex, but rather sat down one day to decide which they wanted to be.

Did they get a sheet of paper with a line drawn down the middle and list the pros and cons of each "choice"?

And after they decided to go with the lifestyle choice of heterosexuality, how did they go about going from having no sexual attraction at all to anyone to becoming sexually attracted to the opposite sex?

Curiously the people who make the "lifestyle choice" claim are always a little shy about discussing how they made the lifestyle choice of heterosexuality.
__________________
The non-theoretical character of metaphysics would not be in itself a defect; all arts have this non-theoretical character without thereby losing their high value for personal as well as for social life. The danger lies in the deceptive character of metaphysics; it gives the illusion of knowledge without actually giving any knowledge. This is the reason why we reject it. - Rudolf Carnap "Philosophy and Logical Syntax"
Robin is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 29th August 2019, 05:44 PM   #9
Robin
Penultimate Amazing
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 10,906
Originally Posted by That19Guy View Post
Au contraire
Maybe you can enlighten me.

I assume you are heterosexual. How did you go about making that choice? At what age did you make the choice?

Let's say you are 13 years old and not sexually attracted to anyone at all and you decided "Hey, I know, I will become one of those heterosexuals", how did you go about it?

How did you make yourself sexually attracted to the opposite sex?
__________________
The non-theoretical character of metaphysics would not be in itself a defect; all arts have this non-theoretical character without thereby losing their high value for personal as well as for social life. The danger lies in the deceptive character of metaphysics; it gives the illusion of knowledge without actually giving any knowledge. This is the reason why we reject it. - Rudolf Carnap "Philosophy and Logical Syntax"

Last edited by Robin; 29th August 2019 at 05:59 PM.
Robin is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 29th August 2019, 05:49 PM   #10
RecoveringYuppy
Philosopher
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 9,332
Originally Posted by That19Guy View Post
Au contraire

Are you massively illiterate? Nothing in the new links you've cited supports "au contraire".
__________________
REJ (Robert E Jones) posting anonymously under my real name for 30 years.

Make a fire for a man and you keep him warm for a day. Set him on fire and you keep him warm for the rest of his life.
RecoveringYuppy is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 29th August 2019, 05:51 PM   #11
Trebuchet
Penultimate Amazing
 
Trebuchet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: The Great Northwet
Posts: 23,427
Yet another bigot on the List That Shall Not Be Named. Thanks for outing yourself.
__________________
Cum catapultae proscribeantur tum soli proscripti catapultas habeant.
Trebuchet is online now   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 29th August 2019, 05:52 PM   #12
Venom
Illuminator
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: United States
Posts: 3,267
Even if you weren't born that way your sexuality probably is still largely if not completely out of your control.
Venom is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 29th August 2019, 05:54 PM   #13
Skeptic Ginger
Nasty Woman
 
Skeptic Ginger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 76,677
Seems to me a lot of anti-gay guys are fighting internal demons about their sexuality.
__________________
That new avatar is cuteness overload.
Restore checks and balances no matter your party affiliation.

Last edited by Skeptic Ginger; 29th August 2019 at 05:55 PM.
Skeptic Ginger is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 29th August 2019, 05:56 PM   #14
Robin
Penultimate Amazing
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 10,906
Originally Posted by Robin View Post
Maybe you can enlighten me.

I assume you are heterosexual. How did you go about making that choice? At what age did you make the choice.

Let's say you are 13 years old and not sexually attracted to anyone at all and you decided "Hey, I know, I will become one of those heterosexuals", how did you go about it?

How did you make yourself sexually attracted to the opposite sex?
@That19guy Or are you claiming that it was some environmental factor that made you heterosexual?

In that case what environmental factor was it that made you attracted to the opposite sex?
__________________
The non-theoretical character of metaphysics would not be in itself a defect; all arts have this non-theoretical character without thereby losing their high value for personal as well as for social life. The danger lies in the deceptive character of metaphysics; it gives the illusion of knowledge without actually giving any knowledge. This is the reason why we reject it. - Rudolf Carnap "Philosophy and Logical Syntax"

Last edited by Robin; 29th August 2019 at 05:58 PM.
Robin is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 29th August 2019, 05:59 PM   #15
That19Guy
Scholar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 116
Originally Posted by Venom View Post
Even if you weren't born that way your sexuality probably is still largely if not completely out of your control.
It's not about caring about who they become, it's about clarifying why the became that way.

I don't want the kids today growing up indoctrinated into a world where people equate homosexuality to something you have no control over.

You have control over it because you have control over your DNA

I know that's too much for them to fathom because they're drones but it's the reality of things

So again.

Wanna smush dudes? Don't care. Wanna swing both ways? Go for it..

Just know that nothing in your chemical composition led you to that life, but rather the interest in that life led to the changes in your chemical composition.
That19Guy is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 29th August 2019, 06:01 PM   #16
RecoveringYuppy
Philosopher
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 9,332
Originally Posted by That19Guy View Post
Just know that nothing in your chemical composition led you to that life, but rather the interest in that life led to the changes in your chemical composition.

That19Guy just proved you wrong.
__________________
REJ (Robert E Jones) posting anonymously under my real name for 30 years.

Make a fire for a man and you keep him warm for a day. Set him on fire and you keep him warm for the rest of his life.
RecoveringYuppy is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 29th August 2019, 06:01 PM   #17
That19Guy
Scholar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 116
Originally Posted by Robin View Post
@That19guy Or are you claiming that it was some environmental factor that made you heterosexual?

In that case what environmental factor was it that made you attracted to the opposite sex?
If you control the environment to a degree where there's as much homosexuality as heterosexuality then you're going to see a rise in homosexuality.

So yeah you can turn someone gay by increasing the likelihood that they turn gay that's very simple logic.

If you go to a batting cage everyday for a month you will become better at hitting a baseball.

If you are subjected to homosexual programming repeatedly and you see more of it than heterosexual influence, you have a likelier chance of growing to be homosexual.

There's nothing outlandish about that logic.

And to be clear: I don't even have a problem with it.

All I care about is acknowledging that that's what has happened in the last 20-30 years in this country and it's only increased in effect
That19Guy is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 29th August 2019, 06:15 PM   #18
Arisia
Graduate Poster
 
Arisia's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: 26.2 from Boston
Posts: 1,049
Whether it's nature or nurture*, it's still not a choice.


*-Nature all the way, of course.


If I wish hard enough, can I change my natural hair color or eye color? You'd think those would be less complicated and more achievable than changing sexual orientation.
Arisia is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 29th August 2019, 06:25 PM   #19
Thermal
Philosopher
 
Thermal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Currently Dismembered
Posts: 8,707
Originally Posted by Robin View Post
Maybe you can enlighten me.

I assume you are heterosexual. How did you go about making that choice? At what age did you make the choice?

Let's say you are 13 years old and not sexually attracted to anyone at all and you decided "Hey, I know, I will become one of those heterosexuals", how did you go about it?

How did you make yourself sexually attracted to the opposite sex?
Taking bets?
__________________
"Half of what he said meant something else, and the other half didn't mean anything at all" -Rosencrantz, on Hamlet
Thermal is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 29th August 2019, 06:27 PM   #20
Venom
Illuminator
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: United States
Posts: 3,267
Originally Posted by That19Guy View Post
It's not about caring about who they become, it's about clarifying why the became that way.

I don't want the kids today growing up indoctrinated into a world where people equate homosexuality to something you have no control over.

You have control over it because you have control over your DNA

I know that's too much for them to fathom because they're drones but it's the reality of things

So again.

Wanna smush dudes? Don't care. Wanna swing both ways? Go for it..

Just know that nothing in your chemical composition led you to that life, but rather the interest in that life led to the changes in your chemical composition.
I had some very strange, some would say deviant thoughts as a small child, I'm talking around 6 years of age.

I'm sure I'm not the only person who's explored their sexuality far before puberty and how can you even blame a child for that? Seems like something we discover rather than something we consciously try to produce.
Venom is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 29th August 2019, 06:34 PM   #21
Puppycow
Penultimate Amazing
 
Puppycow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 24,144
Originally Posted by That19Guy View Post
Au contraire

DNA evolves as you age... I'll spare you all the details since y'all should know this by now but if you dont know here's a very basic intro article to it called:

" YOUR DNA CHANGES AS YOU AGE"
https://gizmodo.com/your-dna-changes-as-you-age-5917672


Connect the dots...but what exactly changes your DNA? What helps it evolve and change?

hmmmmmm


environment?


Yeah that was easy.
Wrong again. Did you even read your own article, or just the headline?
Quote:
While our bodies age, scientists believe that our DNA at least remains constant. New research, however, reveals that, even though its sequence remains constant, subtle chemical changes occur to our DNA as we age—and it could explain why the risk of developing disease increases as we get older.
The difference is in a thing called methylation, which the study found varied according to age, but there was no suggestion that different environments would result in different patterns of methylation.

Bottom line is the basic gene sequence, the code, does not change or "evolve" as we age.
__________________
A fool thinks himself to be wise, but a wise man knows himself to be a fool.
William Shakespeare
Puppycow is online now   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 29th August 2019, 06:51 PM   #22
Robin
Penultimate Amazing
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 10,906
Originally Posted by That19Guy View Post
If you control the environment to a degree where there's as much homosexuality as heterosexuality then you're going to see a rise in homosexuality.

So yeah you can turn someone gay by increasing the likelihood that they turn gay that's very simple logic.

If you go to a batting cage everyday for a month you will become better at hitting a baseball.

If you are subjected to homosexual programming repeatedly and you see more of it than heterosexual influence, you have a likelier chance of growing to be homosexual.

There's nothing outlandish about that logic.

And to be clear: I don't even have a problem with it.

All I care about is acknowledging that that's what has happened in the last 20-30 years in this country and it's only increased in effect
You didn't answer the question.

Did environmental factors turn you into a heterosexual? If so, what environmental factor caused that to happen?

Or did you decide one day to make yourself attracted people of the opposite sex?

To be clear I don't have a problem with heterosexuality either, I think it is fine and natural and that heterosexuals can go on to be productive members of society.

(PS, if you don't want to talk about some tragic event that turned you into a heterosexual then that's OK)
__________________
The non-theoretical character of metaphysics would not be in itself a defect; all arts have this non-theoretical character without thereby losing their high value for personal as well as for social life. The danger lies in the deceptive character of metaphysics; it gives the illusion of knowledge without actually giving any knowledge. This is the reason why we reject it. - Rudolf Carnap "Philosophy and Logical Syntax"
Robin is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 29th August 2019, 07:02 PM   #23
Norman Alexander
Philosopher
 
Norman Alexander's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 6,343
Originally Posted by Puppycow View Post
Bottom line is the basic gene sequence, the code, does not change or "evolve" as we age.
If cells do change their DNA, they become mutated and grow very differently. That's what we usually call "cancer", not "homosexuality".

Seems our OP also has a severe case of mistaking the symptom for the cause.
__________________
...our governments are just trying to protect us from terror. In the same way that someone banging a hornets’ nest with a stick is trying to protect us from hornets. Frankie Boyle, Guardian, July 2015
Norman Alexander is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 29th August 2019, 07:06 PM   #24
Norman Alexander
Philosopher
 
Norman Alexander's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 6,343
Our OP should have clicked on a related link to that story on the same website: 5 Myths About Gay People

One of these myths is:
Quote:
BEING GAY IS A CHOICE

While some claim that being gay is a choice, or that homosexuality can be cured, evidence is mounting that same-sex attraction is at least partly genetic and biologically based.

To test whether genes play a role, researchers have compared identical twins (in which all genes are shared) to fraternal twins (in which about 50 percent of genes are shared). A 2001 review of such twin studies reported that almost all found identical twins were significantly more likely to share a sexual orientation – that is, to be either both gay, or both straight – than fraternal twins, who are less genetically close. Such findings indicate that genes do factor into a person's orientation.

Other studies have found that biological effects, such as hormone exposure in the womb, can also play a role in shaping sexual orientation. And findings of physiological differences, such as different inner ear shapes between homosexual and heterosexual women, contribute to this idea.

"The results support the theory that differences in the central nervous system exist between homosexual and heterosexual individuals and that the differences are possibly related to early factors in brain development," said Sandra Witelson of McMaster University in Ontario, an author on the 1998 inner ear finding published in the journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
__________________
...our governments are just trying to protect us from terror. In the same way that someone banging a hornets’ nest with a stick is trying to protect us from hornets. Frankie Boyle, Guardian, July 2015
Norman Alexander is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 29th August 2019, 07:09 PM   #25
deadrose
Illuminator
 
deadrose's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: the wet side of the mountains
Posts: 3,218
They didn't find a *single* gay gene, they found several genes that correlated to being gay to a more than random level. From what they've found it looks as if it's a combination of genetic propensity, birth order, and several other possible factors, but it's not something you choose.

I wish people would learn about genetics beyond Mendel and Punnett squares, I really do.
deadrose is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 29th August 2019, 07:10 PM   #26
deadrose
Illuminator
 
deadrose's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: the wet side of the mountains
Posts: 3,218
Also the business with the birth order among boys means that the Quiverfull type Christians, by having as many babies as they possibly can, are producing more than the average of gay kids
deadrose is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 29th August 2019, 07:19 PM   #27
Robin
Penultimate Amazing
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 10,906
I have always marvelled that the human race survived given that heterosexuality is such an ephemeral condition that evaporates, for example, in the presence of a Telly Tubby with a handbag
__________________
The non-theoretical character of metaphysics would not be in itself a defect; all arts have this non-theoretical character without thereby losing their high value for personal as well as for social life. The danger lies in the deceptive character of metaphysics; it gives the illusion of knowledge without actually giving any knowledge. This is the reason why we reject it. - Rudolf Carnap "Philosophy and Logical Syntax"
Robin is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 29th August 2019, 07:22 PM   #28
acbytesla
Penultimate Amazing
 
acbytesla's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 22,972
Originally Posted by That19Guy View Post
Au contraire

DNA evolves as you age... I'll spare you all the details since y'all should know this by now but if you dont know here's a very basic intro article to it called:

" YOUR DNA CHANGES AS YOU AGE"
https://gizmodo.com/your-dna-changes-as-you-age-5917672


Connect the dots...but what exactly changes your DNA? What helps it evolve and change?

hmmmmmm


environment?


Yeah that was easy.

Here's some Science supporting that too. This one's called:

ENVIRONMENTAL INFLUENCES ON GENE EXPRESSION

https://www.nature.com/scitable/topi...xpression-536/


So like many people have known for years, folk become who they become because of the world around them, not the world within them.

I know it's not what you wanted it to be but it is what it is
Frankly, it makes no difference to me whether it's biological or environmental.

What I don't believe is that it is a choice. People like what they like and don't like what they don't. I do know that people's tastes change. I can think of at least a dozen foods I could not stand when I was younger that I love now. I can also think of foods I still hate.

Maybe it's that way with penis. Some people love it right from the start and others develop a taste for it. Either way, It's each individual's life. You should be free to live it.
__________________
Try
Science, not superstition.
Reason, not revelation.
Education, not epiphanies
Intellect, not ignorance.
.

Last edited by acbytesla; 29th August 2019 at 07:31 PM.
acbytesla is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 29th August 2019, 07:22 PM   #29
Roboramma
Penultimate Amazing
 
Roboramma's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Shanghai
Posts: 13,112
The OP's conclusions are contradicted in almost every sentence in the quoted text. I was going to highlight some of those contradictions but I'd literally need to quote the whole thing. Instead I suggest the OP go back and read the text he quoted.

Biology is complicated and almost all traits are associated with complexes of genes rather than some single gene that turns some trait on or off. The analogy with height mentioned in the quote is a good one.

I suppose it's possible that, like height, the environmental influences on sexual orientation might become more well understood and parents wanting children of one sexual orientation or the other could try to increase the probability by making changes to their environment. But, given that those influences currently aren't well understood, I'll take the OP's speculations about what they are as just that, speculation.
__________________
"... when people thought the Earth was flat, they were wrong. When people thought the Earth was spherical they were wrong. But if you think that thinking the Earth is spherical is just as wrong as thinking the Earth is flat, then your view is wronger than both of them put together."
Isaac Asimov
Roboramma is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 29th August 2019, 07:22 PM   #30
isissxn
Rough Around the Edges
 
isissxn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Deep Storage
Posts: 6,276
This is good news, OP! According to your interpretation of these findings, I must be able to turn myself into a lesbian, after all. I'm going to get right on that. I knew I just wasn't trying hard enough.

I can't wait. No more "Mars vs. Venus" complications for me.

Ladies?
isissxn is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 29th August 2019, 07:22 PM   #31
uke2se
Penultimate Amazing
 
uke2se's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 13,414
Could we please discuss the article and not the OP's bigoted and ridiculous interpretation of it? We certainly shouldn't engage with any of his posts.
__________________
Before you say something stupid about climate change, check this list.

"If we extend unlimited tolerance even to those who are intolerant, if we are not prepared to defend a tolerant society against the onslaught of the intolerant, then the tolerant will be destroyed, and tolerance with them. " Karl Popper, The Open Society and Its Enemies Vol. 1
uke2se is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 29th August 2019, 07:24 PM   #32
Roboramma
Penultimate Amazing
 
Roboramma's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Shanghai
Posts: 13,112
Originally Posted by acbytesla View Post
Frankly, it makes no difference to me whether it's biological or environmental. What I don't believe is that it is a choice. People like what they like and don't like what they don't. I do know that people's tastes change. I can think of at least a dozen foods I could not stand when I was younger that I love now. I can also think of foods I still hate.

Maybe it's that way with penis. Some people love it right from the start and others develop a taste for it. Either way, It's each individual's life. You should be free to live it.
Yep.

As mentioned in the quoted text, height is similarly affected by many genes, and also has an environmental component. But I certainly didn't choose to be 5'7", and if one day I decide that I'd rather be 6', I doubt I'll be successful.
__________________
"... when people thought the Earth was flat, they were wrong. When people thought the Earth was spherical they were wrong. But if you think that thinking the Earth is spherical is just as wrong as thinking the Earth is flat, then your view is wronger than both of them put together."
Isaac Asimov
Roboramma is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 29th August 2019, 07:26 PM   #33
Roboramma
Penultimate Amazing
 
Roboramma's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Shanghai
Posts: 13,112
Originally Posted by uke2se View Post
Could we please discuss the article and not the OP's bigoted and ridiculous interpretation of it? We certainly shouldn't engage with any of his posts.
The article is interesting in that they put together a much larger database linking people to their genomes than has been done before in looking at this question. The results are in line with everything I had previously understood on the topic. Good science but nothing ground breaking.

Unsurprisingly, particularly for a behavioural trait, sexual orientation is a complex interplay of many factors.
__________________
"... when people thought the Earth was flat, they were wrong. When people thought the Earth was spherical they were wrong. But if you think that thinking the Earth is spherical is just as wrong as thinking the Earth is flat, then your view is wronger than both of them put together."
Isaac Asimov
Roboramma is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 29th August 2019, 07:32 PM   #34
Robin
Penultimate Amazing
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 10,906
Originally Posted by uke2se View Post
Could we please discuss the article and not the OP's bigoted and ridiculous interpretation of it? We certainly shouldn't engage with any of his posts.
But the article is pretty much the conventional view. The "There is a gene for that" attitude is a popular simplification. Pretty much everything is not the result of a single gene but the effect of a number of genes interacting and also the environment.


So there is nothing new or controversial about the article.
__________________
The non-theoretical character of metaphysics would not be in itself a defect; all arts have this non-theoretical character without thereby losing their high value for personal as well as for social life. The danger lies in the deceptive character of metaphysics; it gives the illusion of knowledge without actually giving any knowledge. This is the reason why we reject it. - Rudolf Carnap "Philosophy and Logical Syntax"
Robin is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 29th August 2019, 07:32 PM   #35
Thermal
Philosopher
 
Thermal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Currently Dismembered
Posts: 8,707
Originally Posted by acbytesla View Post
Frankly, it makes no difference to me whether it's biological or environmental. What I don't believe is that it is a choice. People like what they like and don't like what they don't. I do know that people's tastes change. I can think of at least a dozen foods I could not stand when I was younger that I love now. I can also think of foods I still hate.

Maybe it's that way with penis. Some people love it right from the start and others develop a taste for it. Either way, It's each individual's life. You should be free to live it.
There we go.

If you are consenting and of age, live it up. I care if you are a nice person, not how you get your rocks off. That's your biz.
__________________
"Half of what he said meant something else, and the other half didn't mean anything at all" -Rosencrantz, on Hamlet
Thermal is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 29th August 2019, 07:35 PM   #36
uke2se
Penultimate Amazing
 
uke2se's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 13,414
Originally Posted by Robin View Post
But the article is pretty much the conventional view. The "There is a gene for that" attitude is a popular simplification. Pretty much everything is not the result of a single gene but the effect of a number of genes interacting and also the environment.


So there is nothing new or controversial about the article.
In that case, I propose we allow the thread to die. Either that, or we can discuss the particular kind of bigotry displayed by the OP. My main point is that we should not engage the OP in any way.
__________________
Before you say something stupid about climate change, check this list.

"If we extend unlimited tolerance even to those who are intolerant, if we are not prepared to defend a tolerant society against the onslaught of the intolerant, then the tolerant will be destroyed, and tolerance with them. " Karl Popper, The Open Society and Its Enemies Vol. 1
uke2se is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 29th August 2019, 07:41 PM   #37
Baylor
Suspended
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 7,975
Originally Posted by Norman Alexander View Post
If cells do change their DNA, they become mutated and grow very differently. That's what we usually call "cancer", not "homosexuality".

Seems our OP also has a severe case of mistaking the symptom for the cause.
Oh god no. Jesus Christ the cringe on here is so bad. Epigenetic changes don't just occur in tumor suppressor genes. This place is so scientifically illiterate, and proud of it.
Baylor is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 29th August 2019, 07:50 PM   #38
Baylor
Suspended
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 7,975
Originally Posted by uke2se View Post
In that case, I propose we allow the thread to die. Either that, or we can discuss the particular kind of bigotry displayed by the OP. My main point is that we should not engage the OP in any way.
Luckily, we don't all live in the homoegeneous white nationalist country of Sweden. We value diversity here at ISF and diverse opinions are welcome. And no one thinks your idiotic maneuvers to control the discussion have any legitimacy.

For those interested in the topic, there is a Wikipedia page on the Epigenetic theories of homosexuality. I suggest giving it a read. I said I will not supply any more links due to the inability of this forum to understand them but i will make an exception here since some people think all epigenetic changes lead to cancer. (wow)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Epigen..._homosexuality
Baylor is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 29th August 2019, 07:53 PM   #39
angrysoba
Philosophile
 
angrysoba's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Osaka, Japan
Posts: 25,834
Originally Posted by That19Guy View Post
Au contraire

DNA evolves as you age... I'll spare you all the details since y'all should know this by now but if you dont know here's a very basic intro article to it called:

" YOUR DNA CHANGES AS YOU AGE"
https://gizmodo.com/your-dna-changes-as-you-age-5917672


Connect the dots...but what exactly changes your DNA? What helps it evolve and change?

hmmmmmm


environment?


Yeah that was easy.

Here's some Science supporting that too. This one's called:

ENVIRONMENTAL INFLUENCES ON GENE EXPRESSION

https://www.nature.com/scitable/topi...xpression-536/


So like many people have known for years, folk become who they become because of the world around them, not the world within them.
All of that probably means something. What it means, nobody (including you) knows.

Quote:
I know it's not what you wanted it to be but it is what it is
Actually, I have no interest in the question of whether homosexuality is nature or nurture. I wouldn't be at all surprised if it is a bit of both.

What bothers me is when people such as yourself, with an obvious axe to grind, misrepresent science news to drive an agenda.
__________________
"The thief and the murderer follow nature just as much as the philanthropist. Cosmic evolution may teach us how the good and the evil tendencies of man may have come about; but, in itself, it is incompetent to furnish any better reason why what we call good is preferable to what we call evil than we had before."

"Evolution and Ethics" T.H. Huxley (1893)
angrysoba is online now   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 29th August 2019, 07:54 PM   #40
Shalamar
Dark Lord of the JREF
 
Shalamar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Somewhere Else
Posts: 4,590
Originally Posted by Baylor View Post
Luckily, we don't all live in the homoegeneous white nationalist country of Sweden. We value diversity here at ISF and diverse opinions are welcome. And no one thinks your idiotic maneuvers to control the discussion have any legitimacy.

For those interested in the topic, there is a Wikipedia page on the Epigenetic theories of homosexuality. I suggest giving it a read. I said I will not supply any more links due to the inability of this forum to understand them but i will make an exception here since some people think all epigenetic changes lead to cancer. (wow)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Epigen..._homosexuality
Since you obviously hate it here, and can only respond via ad-hom, and personal attacks, why stay here? The OP has already been shown to be hilariously wrong, and people have the ability to respond, or not. What is being stated is that since the OP is so wrong, and it has been pointed out as such, there is no point in engaging.
__________________

"The truth is out there. But the lies are inside your head."
Shalamar is online now   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Reply

International Skeptics Forum » General Topics » Social Issues & Current Events

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:43 AM.
Powered by vBulletin. Copyright ©2000 - 2019, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This forum began as part of the James Randi Education Foundation (JREF). However, the forum now exists as
an independent entity with no affiliation with or endorsement by the JREF, including the section in reference to "JREF" topics.

Disclaimer: Messages posted in the Forum are solely the opinion of their authors.