ISF Logo   IS Forum
Forum Index Register Members List Events Mark Forums Read Help

Go Back   International Skeptics Forum » General Topics » Social Issues & Current Events
 


Welcome to the International Skeptics Forum, where we discuss skepticism, critical thinking, the paranormal and science in a friendly but lively way. You are currently viewing the forum as a guest, which means you are missing out on discussing matters that are of interest to you. Please consider registering so you can gain full use of the forum features and interact with other Members. Registration is simple, fast and free! Click here to register today.
Reply
Old 18th October 2019, 09:27 AM   #1
Ranb
Penultimate Amazing
 
Ranb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: WA USA
Posts: 10,050
Alcohol Detectors in Cars

Bill would require new vehicles to have alcohol detectors to fight drunken driving
https://www.washingtonpost.com/trans...unken-driving/

Quote:
A new push is underway for federal legislation that would require new U.S. vehicles to have alcohol-detecting devices that stop drunk drivers before they get on the road.

The measure, backed by Mothers Against Drunk Driving (MADD), would require automakers to build cars and trucks with passive detection systems that prevent the vehicle from operating if the driver is impaired.

Such devices, known as ignition interlocks, are in widespread use for those charged or convicted of drunken driving; they require the driver to exhale into a Breathaylzer-like device and prevent the car from starting if a personís blood alcohol level is above the legal limit.Ē

But researchers and engineers have been working to develop newer technology that would obtain instantaneous and precise readings of every driverís blood alcohol level when the driver attempts to start the vehicle. Safety advocates hope the technology will become as standard as air bags. Limited road testing has been underway in Maryland and Virginia.
Another way to reduce accidents and injuries would be to put speed limiters on all vehicles. Limit SUV's/trucks and anything towing a trailer to 65 kph and cars to 90 kph. This will also greatly reduce fuel consumption.

Ranb
Ranb is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 18th October 2019, 10:02 AM   #2
Thermal
Penultimate Amazing
 
Thermal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Posts: 10,034
Well, the world would be safer if we got rid of red meat...and guns...and cars...

These kind of measures are, of course, billed as 'for our own good'. Not crazy about all the peeking and prying that there seems to be a great new benefit for every day.
__________________

Whenever you find yourself on the side of the majority, it is time to pause and reflect -Mark Twain

Truth is not what you want it to be; it is what it is, and you must bend to its power or live a lie -Miyamoto Musashi
Thermal is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 18th October 2019, 10:12 AM   #3
TragicMonkey
Poisoned Waffles
 
TragicMonkey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Monkey
Posts: 54,431
The robot cars will be around before long, solving that particular problem. I look forward to the day when my car drives itself, it'll feel like being chauffeured. I'll give all my orders in a Captain Picard voice. "Automobile! Lay in a course for the Chicken Fingery! Engage! Raise air conditioning! Can you play anything by The Prince of Rap? You can? Make it so!" As a passenger I'll be free to drink what I please but of course it'll just be tea. Earl Grey. Hot.
__________________
You added nothing to that conversation, Barbara.
TragicMonkey is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 18th October 2019, 10:27 AM   #4
Ron Swanson
Illuminator
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Canada
Posts: 3,521
Originally Posted by Ranb View Post
Bill would require new vehicles to have alcohol detectors to fight drunken driving
https://www.washingtonpost.com/trans...unken-driving/



Another way to reduce accidents and injuries would be to put speed limiters on all vehicles. Limit SUV's/trucks and anything towing a trailer to 65 kph and cars to 90 kph. This will also greatly reduce fuel consumption.

Ranb
I read they are used in some contries ... In the UK they will be mandated on all new cars in the next three years>

I read an article once that they even have GPS so you can drive at full speed on race tracks, for people who race their street car
Ron Swanson is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 18th October 2019, 10:29 AM   #5
Ron Swanson
Illuminator
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Canada
Posts: 3,521
Originally Posted by TragicMonkey View Post
The robot cars will be around before long, solving that particular problem. I look forward to the day when my car drives itself, it'll feel like being chauffeured. I'll give all my orders in a Captain Picard voice. "Automobile! Lay in a course for the Chicken Fingery! Engage! Raise air conditioning! Can you play anything by The Prince of Rap? You can? Make it so!" As a passenger I'll be free to drink what I please but of course it'll just be tea. Earl Grey. Hot.
Im not as sure about that as I used to be (Im big fan)

I saw testing lately where many of the cars plowed right over "pedestrian dummy" in testing at under 15 mph or so

But at hi-ways speeds they ALL ran over the pedestrians
Ron Swanson is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 18th October 2019, 10:33 AM   #6
Ron Swanson
Illuminator
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Canada
Posts: 3,521
Originally Posted by Ranb View Post
Bill would require new vehicles to have alcohol detectors to fight drunken driving ...
As t this I do not care for two reasons ... I refuse to drive after even having ONE drink ... (It's just not worth the risk now)

AND I refuse to by a new vehicle, I am currently without a car (first time since i was probably 12 years old) and I plan to purchase a very OLD car when I am rich enough to afford one again.
Ron Swanson is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 18th October 2019, 10:45 AM   #7
TragicMonkey
Poisoned Waffles
 
TragicMonkey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Monkey
Posts: 54,431
Originally Posted by Ron Swanson View Post
Im not as sure about that as I used to be (Im big fan)

I saw testing lately where many of the cars plowed right over "pedestrian dummy" in testing at under 15 mph or so

But at hi-ways speeds they ALL ran over the pedestrians
"Everyone inside the car was fine!" --Michael Scott, addressing an objection to him driving people to the hospital to visit the woman he ran over an hour earlier.
__________________
You added nothing to that conversation, Barbara.
TragicMonkey is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 18th October 2019, 10:49 AM   #8
johnny karate
... and your little dog too.
 
johnny karate's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 12,626
Originally Posted by Thermal View Post
Well, the world would be safer if we got rid of red meat...and guns...and cars...

These kind of measures are, of course, billed as 'for our own good'. Not crazy about all the peeking and prying that there seems to be a great new benefit for every day.
Just to be clear: You consider implementing measures to determine if someone is intoxicated before getting behind the wheel of a car to be an invasion of privacy?
johnny karate is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 18th October 2019, 10:56 AM   #9
The Don
Penultimate Amazing
 
The Don's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Sir Fynwy
Posts: 28,151
If the devices are accurate and they prevent the vehicle from being started then that's fine by me. If they also contact local law enforcement to have the driver charged with DUI then there may be an invasion of privacy case IMO.
The Don is online now   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 18th October 2019, 10:58 AM   #10
Bob001
Philosopher
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 9,920
Originally Posted by Ranb View Post
Bill would require new vehicles to have alcohol detectors to fight drunken driving
https://www.washingtonpost.com/trans...unken-driving/

Another way to reduce accidents and injuries would be to put speed limiters on all vehicles. Limit SUV's/trucks and anything towing a trailer to 65 kph and cars to 90 kph. This will also greatly reduce fuel consumption.

Ranb
So how reliable are the detectors? If they work, and they are already routinely used as part of drunk driving sentences, what's the problem? There is no constitutional right to drive, let alone a right to drive drunk. An alternative would be to allow drivers to start and operate their cars despite a high alcohol reading, but the reading would be recorded and could be used as evidence after an accident or a traffic stop. Or how 'bout allowing people to drive, but the gadget would send a gps message to law enforcement inviting them to stop the drunk driver?

Last edited by Bob001; 18th October 2019 at 11:00 AM.
Bob001 is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 18th October 2019, 11:01 AM   #11
TragicMonkey
Poisoned Waffles
 
TragicMonkey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Monkey
Posts: 54,431
Originally Posted by johnny karate View Post
Just to be clear: You consider implementing measures to determine if someone is intoxicated before getting behind the wheel of a car to be an invasion of privacy?
Child pornography is illegal. Let's have law enforcement install monitoring software on all personal computers.
__________________
You added nothing to that conversation, Barbara.
TragicMonkey is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 18th October 2019, 11:07 AM   #12
Thermal
Penultimate Amazing
 
Thermal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Posts: 10,034
Originally Posted by TragicMonkey View Post
Child pornography is illegal. Let's have law enforcement install monitoring software on all personal computers.
Well put.
__________________

Whenever you find yourself on the side of the majority, it is time to pause and reflect -Mark Twain

Truth is not what you want it to be; it is what it is, and you must bend to its power or live a lie -Miyamoto Musashi
Thermal is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 18th October 2019, 11:08 AM   #13
The Don
Penultimate Amazing
 
The Don's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Sir Fynwy
Posts: 28,151
Originally Posted by TragicMonkey View Post
Child pornography is illegal. Let's have law enforcement install monitoring software on all personal computers.
If the sole purpose was to detect child pornography and it coul do so inerrantly and it stopped a person accessing it, where is the problem.
The Don is online now   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 18th October 2019, 11:09 AM   #14
johnny karate
... and your little dog too.
 
johnny karate's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 12,626
Originally Posted by TragicMonkey View Post
Child pornography is illegal. Let's have law enforcement install monitoring software on all personal computers.
A better analogy would be a mechanism that blocked access to child pornography. I wouldn't have problem with that.
johnny karate is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 18th October 2019, 11:10 AM   #15
Thermal
Penultimate Amazing
 
Thermal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Posts: 10,034
Originally Posted by The Don View Post
If the sole purpose was to detect child pornography and it coul do so inerrantly and it stopped a person accessing it, where is the problem.
Inerrantly, you say?

Sole purpose, you say?
__________________

Whenever you find yourself on the side of the majority, it is time to pause and reflect -Mark Twain

Truth is not what you want it to be; it is what it is, and you must bend to its power or live a lie -Miyamoto Musashi
Thermal is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 18th October 2019, 11:10 AM   #16
TragicMonkey
Poisoned Waffles
 
TragicMonkey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Monkey
Posts: 54,431
Originally Posted by The Don View Post
If the sole purpose was to detect child pornography and it coul do so inerrantly and it stopped a person accessing it, where is the problem.
Oh, it's multifunctional. They can detect all sorts of things. And it will use 40% of your CPU at all times. But worth it, right?
__________________
You added nothing to that conversation, Barbara.
TragicMonkey is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 18th October 2019, 11:11 AM   #17
TragicMonkey
Poisoned Waffles
 
TragicMonkey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Monkey
Posts: 54,431
Originally Posted by johnny karate View Post
A better analogy would be a mechanism that blocked access to child pornography. I wouldn't have problem with that.
They have those! You're okay with 20kps internet, right?
__________________
You added nothing to that conversation, Barbara.
TragicMonkey is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 18th October 2019, 11:13 AM   #18
johnny karate
... and your little dog too.
 
johnny karate's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 12,626
Originally Posted by Thermal View Post
Well put.
Except that no one is suggesting that there will be some kind of ongoing monitoring of people's behavior.

It's a device that prevents an intoxicated person from operating a motor vehicle.

I'm not seeing the problem.
johnny karate is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 18th October 2019, 11:13 AM   #19
Babbylonian
Penultimate Amazing
 
Babbylonian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 12,431
Could somebody possibly make a good argument against these alcohol detectors?

Invasion of privacy is a **** argument unless the data are being sent somewhere to at least be collated and stored for potential future use.

Comparing them to performance inhibitors is a **** argument because one can at least imagine a situation where going fast might be necessary. Conversely, it's also a **** argument because capping consumer vehicle speeds might indeed be just as good an idea as preventing people from driving while intoxicated.

As long as the breathalyzers are reliable and accurate they seem like a good idea and, so far, some people here I generally find pretty intelligent are making really terrible arguments against them.
Babbylonian is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 18th October 2019, 11:14 AM   #20
johnny karate
... and your little dog too.
 
johnny karate's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 12,626
Originally Posted by TragicMonkey View Post
They have those! You're okay with 20kps internet, right?
No, probably not.

Will the alcohol-detector have some similar effect on my car?
johnny karate is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 18th October 2019, 11:17 AM   #21
Thermal
Penultimate Amazing
 
Thermal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Posts: 10,034
Originally Posted by johnny karate View Post
A better analogy would be a mechanism that blocked access to child pornography. I wouldn't have problem with that.
The problem is the actual mechanics of it. It would effectively be a monitor on your usage, each and every page. In a perfect world, fine. Its not a perfect world. By a long shot
__________________

Whenever you find yourself on the side of the majority, it is time to pause and reflect -Mark Twain

Truth is not what you want it to be; it is what it is, and you must bend to its power or live a lie -Miyamoto Musashi
Thermal is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 18th October 2019, 11:17 AM   #22
TragicMonkey
Poisoned Waffles
 
TragicMonkey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Monkey
Posts: 54,431
Originally Posted by johnny karate View Post
No, probably not.

Will the alcohol-detector have some similar effect on my car?
There's no way to tell until the extra machinery is compulsorily added to every car so you can pay for equipment that assumes you are a drunkard and criminal.
__________________
You added nothing to that conversation, Barbara.
TragicMonkey is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 18th October 2019, 11:20 AM   #23
Thermal
Penultimate Amazing
 
Thermal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Posts: 10,034
Originally Posted by TragicMonkey View Post
They have those! You're okay with 20kps internet, right?
It's a step at a time. 20 years ago, I would have not believed how much personal info can be accessed by anyone with a phone. One innocent step at a time is how this slippery slope works, but with your consent each step.
__________________

Whenever you find yourself on the side of the majority, it is time to pause and reflect -Mark Twain

Truth is not what you want it to be; it is what it is, and you must bend to its power or live a lie -Miyamoto Musashi
Thermal is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 18th October 2019, 11:20 AM   #24
Bob001
Philosopher
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 9,920
Originally Posted by TragicMonkey View Post
Child pornography is illegal. Let's have law enforcement install monitoring software on all personal computers.
A key difference -- one of them -- is that what you do in your own home has limited immediate impact on others. A drunk driver is operating on the public roadways posing an imminent threat to everyone else. And unlike using a PC, operating a motor vehicle requires a valid license, and the vehicle must be registered. A condition of holding the license is that you don't drive drunk. Proving that you're sober before you drive is not much of a stretch.

And child pornography is mostly distributed via the dark web. If you could get it on Ebay or Google, I suspect law enforcement would find you.
https://www.techspot.com/news/82382-...rnography.html
Bob001 is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 18th October 2019, 11:23 AM   #25
Thermal
Penultimate Amazing
 
Thermal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Posts: 10,034
Originally Posted by TragicMonkey View Post
There's no way to tell until the extra machinery is compulsorily added to every car so you can pay for equipment that assumes you are a drunkard and criminal.
Don't we all really like to have to prove our innocence at random, though? I sure do. The cavity searches before entering a school can be refreshing
__________________

Whenever you find yourself on the side of the majority, it is time to pause and reflect -Mark Twain

Truth is not what you want it to be; it is what it is, and you must bend to its power or live a lie -Miyamoto Musashi
Thermal is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 18th October 2019, 11:24 AM   #26
johnny karate
... and your little dog too.
 
johnny karate's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 12,626
Originally Posted by Thermal View Post
The problem is the actual mechanics of it. It would effectively be a monitor on your usage, each and every page. In a perfect world, fine. Its not a perfect world. By a long shot
Cool. I still don’t see what this has to do with having an alcohol-detecting device on a car.

Last edited by johnny karate; 18th October 2019 at 11:30 AM.
johnny karate is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 18th October 2019, 11:27 AM   #27
TragicMonkey
Poisoned Waffles
 
TragicMonkey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Monkey
Posts: 54,431
As an American I have a constitutional (in every sense) objection to a system that requires the entire public to be subjected to unwarranted search in order to prove their innocence of a crime for which there has been no reason to suspect them. It's one of the things that prompted the Revolution in the first place. People died for that principle. They killed for it. And some of you are bleating sheepily about the social good it would be to undo it? I think some of you need alcohol-detecting lockouts on your keyboards!
__________________
You added nothing to that conversation, Barbara.
TragicMonkey is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 18th October 2019, 11:28 AM   #28
Bob001
Philosopher
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 9,920
Originally Posted by Thermal View Post
Don't we all really like to have to prove our innocence at random, though? I sure do. The cavity searches before entering a school can be refreshing
Drunk-driver checkpoints, where drivers do have to "prove their innocence" at random, have been ruled legal by numerous courts. Think of an ignition lock as your friend that keeps you from going to jail.
Bob001 is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 18th October 2019, 11:29 AM   #29
johnny karate
... and your little dog too.
 
johnny karate's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 12,626
Originally Posted by TragicMonkey View Post
There's no way to tell until the extra machinery is compulsorily added to every car so you can pay for equipment that assumes you are a drunkard and criminal.
There might be a way to tell.

For instance, we could look at the devices like this that already exist and are in use and see if they are secretly monitoring behavior or negatively affecting gas mileage.
johnny karate is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 18th October 2019, 11:30 AM   #30
TragicMonkey
Poisoned Waffles
 
TragicMonkey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Monkey
Posts: 54,431
Originally Posted by Bob001 View Post
Drunk-driver checkpoints, where drivers do have to "prove their innocence" at random, have been ruled legal by numerous courts. Think of an ignition lock as your friend that keeps you from going to jail.
More than a friend, a big brother!
__________________
You added nothing to that conversation, Barbara.
TragicMonkey is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 18th October 2019, 11:30 AM   #31
Thermal
Penultimate Amazing
 
Thermal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Posts: 10,034
Originally Posted by johnny karate View Post
Cool. I still donít see what this has to do with having an alcohol-detecting on a car.
Why should you have to prove you are not drunk when you are just driving?

What about pills? Weed? Maybe you're just not that bright, so we should drop an IQ battery on you too (generic)?

Even well-intentioned nannyism is no bueno.
__________________

Whenever you find yourself on the side of the majority, it is time to pause and reflect -Mark Twain

Truth is not what you want it to be; it is what it is, and you must bend to its power or live a lie -Miyamoto Musashi
Thermal is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 18th October 2019, 11:31 AM   #32
Bob001
Philosopher
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 9,920
Originally Posted by TragicMonkey View Post
As an American I have a constitutional (in every sense) objection to a system that requires the entire public to be subjected to unwarranted search in order to prove their innocence of a crime for which there has been no reason to suspect them. It's one of the things that prompted the Revolution in the first place. People died for that principle. They killed for it. And some of you are bleating sheepily about the social good it would be to undo it? I think some of you need alcohol-detecting lockouts on your keyboards!
I repeat, there is no constitutional right to drive. It is a licensed privilege. Proving that you are fit to exercise the privilege is a legitimate condition of holding the license. Preventing you from breaking the law is more civilized than arresting you when you do.
Bob001 is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 18th October 2019, 11:32 AM   #33
TragicMonkey
Poisoned Waffles
 
TragicMonkey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Monkey
Posts: 54,431
Originally Posted by Thermal View Post
Why should you have to prove you are not drunk when you are just driving?

What about pills? Weed? Maybe you're just not that bright, so we should drop an IQ battery on you too (generic)?

Even well-intentioned nannyism is no bueno.
Vitamin D deficiency is common, and leads to physical fatigue and cognitive decline. I think a full blood panel is called for.
__________________
You added nothing to that conversation, Barbara.
TragicMonkey is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 18th October 2019, 11:32 AM   #34
johnny karate
... and your little dog too.
 
johnny karate's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 12,626
Originally Posted by TragicMonkey View Post
As an American I have a constitutional (in every sense) objection to a system that requires the entire public to be subjected to unwarranted search in order to prove their innocence of a crime for which there has been no reason to suspect them. It's one of the things that prompted the Revolution in the first place. People died for that principle. They killed for it. And some of you are bleating sheepily about the social good it would be to undo it? I think some of you need alcohol-detecting lockouts on your keyboards!
But no one is searching you or otherwise invading your privacy.

Itís nothing more than a closed-system device that prevents a car from starting.
johnny karate is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 18th October 2019, 11:34 AM   #35
johnny karate
... and your little dog too.
 
johnny karate's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 12,626
Originally Posted by Thermal View Post
Why should you have to prove you are not drunk when you are just driving?

What about pills? Weed? Maybe you're just not that bright, so we should drop an IQ battery on you too (generic)?

Even well-intentioned nannyism is no bueno.
You and TragicMonkey keep imagining some Big Brother element to this that doesnít exist.

There is no monitoring going on. No one is watching you and judging your behavior.

Itís simply a device that prevents your car from starting.
johnny karate is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 18th October 2019, 11:35 AM   #36
TragicMonkey
Poisoned Waffles
 
TragicMonkey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Monkey
Posts: 54,431
Originally Posted by Bob001 View Post
I repeat, there is no constitutional right to drive. It is a licensed privilege. Proving that you are fit to exercise the privilege is a legitimate condition of holding the license. Preventing you from breaking the law is more civilized than arresting you when you do.
And I repeat, there very much is a constitutional right to prevent unreasonable search. It isn't predicated on the activity interrupted by the search having to itself be constitutionally enumerated.

And if prevention of crime is the civilized thing that trumps individual liberty then it would be even more effective and therefore more civilized to attach ankle monitors with video and audio recording to everyone. It could even detect alcohol level too.
__________________
You added nothing to that conversation, Barbara.
TragicMonkey is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 18th October 2019, 11:35 AM   #37
Bob001
Philosopher
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 9,920
Here's a business plan: If this takes effect on all new cars, dealers could sell pre-interlock used cars at a premium to drunk drivers. In time the only old cars on the road would be the drunkdrivermobiles, and cops could keep an eye on them.
Bob001 is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 18th October 2019, 11:36 AM   #38
Thermal
Penultimate Amazing
 
Thermal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Posts: 10,034
Originally Posted by Bob001 View Post
Drunk-driver checkpoints, where drivers do have to "prove their innocence" at random, have been ruled legal by numerous courts. Think of an ignition lock as your friend that keeps you from going to jail.
Groovy. What other 'for my own good' treats are in store? Ones that could never be abused or repurposed, of course. Hey, even a malfunction could be fun. All to keep proving my innocence at all times.

Well intentioned. Seemingly benign. Still not good. Direct monitoring is always bad to a normal person. Leave us the **** alone.
__________________

Whenever you find yourself on the side of the majority, it is time to pause and reflect -Mark Twain

Truth is not what you want it to be; it is what it is, and you must bend to its power or live a lie -Miyamoto Musashi
Thermal is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 18th October 2019, 11:36 AM   #39
TragicMonkey
Poisoned Waffles
 
TragicMonkey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Monkey
Posts: 54,431
Originally Posted by johnny karate View Post
You and TragicMonkey keep imagining some Big Brother element to this that doesnít exist.

There is no monitoring going on. No one is watching you and judging your behavior.

Itís simply a device that prevents your car from starting.
A device that operates by searching your body for particular chemicals.
__________________
You added nothing to that conversation, Barbara.
TragicMonkey is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Old 18th October 2019, 11:38 AM   #40
TragicMonkey
Poisoned Waffles
 
TragicMonkey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Monkey
Posts: 54,431
Originally Posted by Bob001 View Post
Here's a business plan: If this takes effect on all new cars, dealers could sell pre-interlock used cars at a premium to drunk drivers. In time the only old cars on the road would be the drunkdrivermobiles, and cops could keep an eye on them.
Yeah, that must be it, nobody could hold a position out of principle. For your information I don't drink and drive. I barely drink at all: I have maybe three beers a year, on separate occasions, when I am not driving. Which is precisely why I shouldn't be subjected to being treated like a criminal.
__________________
You added nothing to that conversation, Barbara.
TragicMonkey is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Nominate this post for this month's language award Copy a direct link to this post Reply With Quote Back to Top
Reply

International Skeptics Forum » General Topics » Social Issues & Current Events

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:55 AM.
Powered by vBulletin. Copyright ©2000 - 2020, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This forum began as part of the James Randi Education Foundation (JREF). However, the forum now exists as
an independent entity with no affiliation with or endorsement by the JREF, including the section in reference to "JREF" topics.

Disclaimer: Messages posted in the Forum are solely the opinion of their authors.