Qanon Conspiracy theories

Status
Not open for further replies.
I like the close of the Reason article.

As evidence of these arrests that Crokin doesn't think are being covered in the mainstream media, she links to news reports on ABC, NBC, and CBS news affiliates, describing events also covered widely by other media in their respective states or regions. The California sting was also reported by mainstream print and broadcast media across the country, as was the broader National Johns Suppression Initiative that resulted in the Texas arrests.
Click to expand...
 
catsmate said:
Cronkin is Trumpette nutter who claimed that the Illuminati use The Wizard Of Oz "to mind control child slaves" isn't she?
Click to expand...

That is correct.

Here is a sentence which, if it were true and written about me, might get me to question my life choices. Especially the highlighted part.

Making a second appearance on a program hosted by one-time “Survivor” contestant Anna Khait that was streamed on Mike Cernovich’s Facebook page last Thursday, Crokin continued on her mission to expose the supposed fact that leading government, entertainment and business leaders are involved in a massive satanic pedophile cult by linking Podesta’s choice of shoes to Illuminati mind-control.
Click to expand...
 
"linking Podesta’s choice of shoes to Illuminati mind-control"

Only insane people could believe that criminal masterminds make those sorts of decisions.
 
Q is back, well, sorta.

8kun managed to go online for a bit. Thanks to the diligent efforts of Brennan and others, 8kun is being is using the shadiest tech providers to get the site online, and the website is barely functional if it is up at all. Hours pass with zero posts on the boards. It's hard to justify the effort, as many other similar boards exist, other than that Q has tied the identity specifically to 8chan.

A few posts have already been made by Q, including one which was just a youtube link to a slow motion video of a waving US flag. neato.

I fully expect Q to get much more weird from this point out. All this time of false promises and no delivery, the only ones left are the most delusional. There's no reason to even pretend to be relevant, just descend straight into the death cult.
 
SuburbanTurkey said:
Q is back, well, sorta.

8kun managed to go online for a bit. Thanks to the diligent efforts of Brennan and others, 8kun is being is using the shadiest tech providers to get the site online, and the website is barely functional if it is up at all. Hours pass with zero posts on the boards. It's hard to justify the effort, as many other similar boards exist, other than that Q has tied the identity specifically to 8chan.

A few posts have already been made by Q, including one which was just a youtube link to a slow motion video of a waving US flag. neato.

I fully expect Q to get much more weird from this point out. All this time of false promises and no delivery, the only ones left are the most delusional. There's no reason to even pretend to be relevant, just descend straight into the death cult.
Click to expand...

Do we really know if it's the same Q as before, or even if it was always the same person posting in 8chan?
 
Belz... said:
Do we really know if it's the same Q as before, or even if it was always the same person posting in 8chan?
Click to expand...

There is lots of speculation about this and it is probably impossible to know. The Q anon anonymous is a great podcast that covers this conspiracy, and they have the opinion that it has changed hands several times since it has started.

8chan has "tripcodes" which should provide some level of security for the "real" Q, but I'm not familiar enough to say how secure that really is. It is at least secure enough that 8chan wasn't absolutely overrun with Q impostors and other pranksters, so that's something.

The simplest answer is no, there's really no way to verify the "real" Q.

Considering the general unreliability of internet culture, 4chan, 8chan, and especially 8chan's owner, nothing should be taken as reliable at all. One might wonder why some super secret government mole would rely on such terrible venues for sharing insider info, but I digress.
 
Last edited:
sts60 said:
This thread is an endless cycle of:
- reposts of spit-flecked arglebargle, either from Q or Q fans, about how the Clintons and Obamas and Deep Staters are all goin’ down real soon now with Selfless Crusading Virtuous Genius Supreme Leader Donald Trump personally fast-roping out of a Black Hawk into Clinton Foundation headquarters with arrest warrants clenched in his teeth...
Click to expand...

I note the Clinton Foundation is still engaged in charitable activities, and is rated four stars (highest rating) by Charity Navigator.

The Trump Organization has been dissolved and is paying, under a plea deal, a couple of million dollars for scamming people. In particular, they stole money raised for veterans and used it for campaign expenses.
 
All the seekrit indictments are going to be released and the deep state agents frogmarched off to Gitmo! Oh, wait, that was last year. Or maybe two years ago, time flies.
 
Trebuchet said:
All the seekrit indictments are going to be released and the deep state agents frogmarched off to Gitmo! Oh, wait, that was last year. Or maybe two years ago, time flies.
Click to expand...

Silly fool. They are already at Gitmo, they've been there for months. DEC4 is when the military tribunals will hand down the sentences and the hangings will start.
 
Q predicted that FISA is a dumpster fire of bad procedure.

That's pretty weak tea. Every civil rights organization in the country has been pointing out the many inadequacies of FISA for over a decade.
 
There is no Q. There is a person pretending to be Q throwing **** at the wall to see what sticks. This beguiles the credulous.
 
SuburbanTurkey said:
Q predicted that FISA is a dumpster fire of bad procedure.

That's pretty weak tea. Every civil rights organization in the country has been pointing out the many inadequacies of FISA for over a decade.
Click to expand...

2002 GOP: We need to pass the USA Patriot Act because National Security.

2002 ACLU: Have you idiots read this law? The FISA requirements are almost non-existent.

2002 GOP: NATIONAL SECURITY! TERRORISTS!
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

2019 GOP: Wow, that FBI FISA warrant in the Trump Campaign case is kinda thin.

2019 Inspector General: Yup, but within the law. Thanks guys.
 
Axxman300 said:
2002 GOP: We need to pass the USA Patriot Act because National Security.

2002 ACLU: Have you idiots read this law? The FISA requirements are almost non-existent.

2002 GOP: NATIONAL SECURITY! TERRORISTS!
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

2019 GOP: Wow, that FBI FISA warrant in the Trump Campaign case is kinda thin.

2019 Inspector General: Yup, but within the law. Thanks guys.
Click to expand...

I suspect that if as much scrutiny was given to all the other FISA warrants, you'd find all kinds of dishonesty and sloppy police work from the feds. The system is set up that there is really no reason why the feds wouldn't behave this way.
 
SuburbanTurkey said:
I suspect that if as much scrutiny was given to all the other FISA warrants, you'd find all kinds of dishonesty and sloppy police work from the feds. The system is set up that there is really no reason why the feds wouldn't behave this way.
Click to expand...

The ACLU has been complaining about the new FISA rules for years:

https://www.aclu.org/cases/aclu-mot...ss-fisa-court-rulings-government-surveillance

The FISC order compelled a Verizon subsidiary to provide to the NSA call records for every phone call placed on its network during a three-month period. Four days later, we and Yale Law School’s Media Freedom and Information Access (MFIA) clinic filed a motion with the FISC requesting that it publish its opinions on the meaning, scope, and constitutionality of Section 215.

The Verizon call-records order, it emerged, belonged to a much larger surveillance program — covering all of the major telephone companies — that had secretly existed for nearly a decade. In the course of the national debate that followed the first disclosure, two things became clear: (1) the phone-records program was not the only bulk-collection surveillance program in which the NSA had engaged; and (2) the FISC opinions interpreting Section 215 are not the only secret court opinions addressing the lawfulness of bulk surveillance.
Click to expand...

It has not been a secret.
 
C'mon guys, admit it.....we all knew Durham would use a grand jury, and we all know there will be no indictments because we just knew it, certainly not Brennan or Comey, just like we all know Durham is famous for grandstanding and stunts.

I'm worried we might look bad wearing egg if some lower level guy decides cooperating looks better than going away for them.
 
We mustn't on that the G-Men withheld exculpatory evidence while feeding garbage to the FISA court.

And now that whiny FISA court judge had the gall to smear our man Comey after that liar Horowitz reported about 20 FBI errors, all of which tilted the table in the same direction, building our ironclad case against Trump.

No worry. Deny everything and we will be in the clear.
 
Bubba said:
We mustn't on that the G-Men withheld exculpatory evidence while feeding garbage to the FISA court.

And now that whiny FISA court judge had the gall to smear our man Comey after that liar Horowitz reported about 20 FBI errors, all of which tilted the table in the same direction, building our ironclad case against Trump.

No worry. Deny everything and we will be in the clear.
Click to expand...

FISA abuse is built into the system. It's a legal proceeding where the defendant doesn't even know he's being targeted and has no advocate. The government goes into a secret room with a judge and feeds them exactly what the judge needs to hear to grant a warrant.

Of course FISA warrant applications withheld evidence. Of course the feds lied on them. Not just for Trump, but for whenever they felt it advantageous or necessary. FISA is a joke.

There is nothing new about Trump's complaints other than suddenly Republicans care about the surveillance state having too much power.
 
Q posts another wristwatch pic (at 1:29)

Horowitz then Barr/Durham release their statements at 1:29.

Its nothing of course.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom