Merged I killed Duality and Uncertainty for a Theory of Everything

pittsburghjoe said:
I think we could create an interstellar drive by shooting matter waves at one end of an EM Drive. Not sure if it would be necessary to give them a physical state in flight (in the cavity) or not.
Click to expand...
And I think we cannot possible do anything like this at all.

How do you propose we go about trying to resolve this pair of opposites?

As this is the Science, Mathematics, Medicine, and Technology board, would you please propose a method (or methods) based on the scientific method?
 
pittsburghjoe said:
No kidding it isn't magic, I thoroughly explained what is really happening.
Click to expand...
And I think you have explained precisely nothing at all, certainly nothing "thoroughly".

How do you propose we go about trying to resolve this pair of opposites?

As this is the Science, Mathematics, Medicine, and Technology board, would you please propose a method (or methods) based on the scientific method?
 
Insane gibberish about an imaginary interstellar drive

pittsburghjoe said:
...
Click to expand...
5 November 2019 pittsburghjoe: Insane gibberish about an imaginary interstellar drive
The insanity is shooting things that do not exist ("matter waves") out of an undefined "EM drive" with his persistent "physical state" insanity. The best interpretation is that he has described an physically impossible rocket :jaw-dropp!
 
167 items of ignorance, fantasy and delusion by pittsburghjoe since 4 September 2019 and counting :jaw-dropp.

15 items of ignorance, fantasy and delusion by pittsburghjoe 11-15 October 2019
11 items of ignorance, fantasy and delusion by pittsburghjoe on 16 October 2019
14 items of ignorance, fantasy and delusion by pittsburghjoe 19/20 October 2019
5 items of ignorance, fantasy and delusion by pittsburghjoe 22-25 October 2019

  1. 25 October 2019 pittsburghjoe: Insane gibberish and delusions about gravitons, etc. this time
  2. 25 October 2019 pittsburghjoe: Usual ignorant gibberish about spacetime
  3. 25 October 2019 pittsburghjoe: Insanity about the information paradox (information not being conserved for black holes) and a virus of 180,000 atoms
  4. 29 October 2019 pittsburghjoe: An "already posted an experiment" fantasy when he posted vague descriptions of an experiment that will never be done.
  5. 29 October 2019 pittsburghjoe: Usual lies about the double slit experiment.
  6. 29 October 2019 pittsburghjoe: Repeats his lie that the "Visualizing quaternions (4d numbers) with stereographic projection" video is about QM.
  7. 29 October 2019 pittsburghjoe: Repeats his spacetime does not exist between galaxies delusion.
  8. 4 November 2019 pittsburghjoe: A spate of ignorant and even insane delusions.
  9. 4 November 2019 pittsburghjoe: Repeats a "distance magically appearing" delusion.
  10. 4 November 2019 pittsburghjoe: Repeats a "empty space has to be different outside a galaxy than inside" delusion.
  11. 5 November 2019 pittsburghjoe: Usual lies - his ignorant delusions do not explain anything to the rest of the world other then his ignorance and delusions!
  12. 5 November 2019 pittsburghjoe: Insane gibberish about an imaginary interstellar drive
  13. 5 November 2019 pittsburghjoe: Writes insane gibberish about "Double Slit, Delay Choice Quantum Eraser, Which Way Quantum Eraser" experiments.
 
The fuel usage would be a million to one. We just have to figure out how to get a stream of unobserved particles running in a vacuum cavity.
 
pittsburghjoe said:
The fuel usage would be a million to one. We just have to figure out how to get a stream of unobserved particles running in a vacuum cavity.
Click to expand...
Could you please re-post this, in a form that makes sense, scientifically?

Thanks in advance.
 
More insane gibberish about an imaginary interstellar drive

pittsburghjoe said:
....
Click to expand...
5 November 2019 pittsburghjoe: More insane gibberish about an imaginary interstellar drive
The insanity is "fuel usage would be a million to one" gibberish about a fuel and drive that just exist in his head.
Is this the insanity that 1 gram of fuel will produce a million "grams" of thrust? Or the insanity of a really inefficient drive - a moon-sized rocket to get to the stars?
 
Last edited:
Missing is drive EM. The what, that is state. Physical a[n] it, giving when waves matter. Considered be microwaves could!

Did I read you right?
 
An insane level of ignorance about microwaves with more gibberish

pittsburghjoe said:
Could microwaves be considered matter waves when giving it a physical state? Is that what the EM Drive is missing?
Click to expand...
6 November 2019 pittsburghjoe: An insane level of ignorance about microwaves with more gibberish about matter waves, physical state and an imaginary interstellar drive

Microwaves are not matter. Microwaves are not bricks, molecules, atoms, protons or electrons which make up matter :jaw-dropp! Microwaves are electromagnetic waves.

What a imaginary interstellar drive is missing is everything!
 
Light is electromagnetic. When it is a photon is has a physical state and might be enough to cause a tiny amount of thrust.
 
A basic fact about light followed by usual gibberish and ignorance

pittsburghjoe said:
Light is electromagnetic. ....
Click to expand...
6 November 2019 pittsburghjoe: A basic fact about light followed by usual gibberish and ignorance.

Photons always cause thrust because they have momentum. Radiation pressure is textbook physics. This is how light sails work. That is the basis for proposed real interstellar spacecraft - bounce lasers off giant sails to produce thrust. No one is ignorant enough to suggest using just lasers or masers (microwave lasers) on interstellar spacecraft for thrust because the thrust is too small for the cost of the mass of the laser and its energy source - they have to be sited off the spacecraft.
 
I think if we could figure out a way to remove quantum fluctuations from a vacuum, the contents of the cavity would not be subject to gravity/spacetime. If a baseball was inside, it would start to float.
 
Usual ignorant delusions - quantum fluctuations cannot be magically removed, etc.

pittsburghjoe said:
I think ...
Click to expand...
6 November 2019 pittsburghjoe: Usual ignorant delusions - quantum fluctuations cannot be magically removed, etc.
Quantum fluctuations are a fundamental property of spacetime in QM.
Gravity is not caused by quantum fluctuations. A baseball in an imaginary box with no quantum fluctuations will still have mass and will fall to the floor of the box.
 
Obviously ignorant that Google exists!

pittsburghjoe said:
Has anyone ever put a vacuum in a Faraday cage?
Click to expand...
6 November 2019 pittsburghjoe: Obviously ignorant that Google exists :p!

https://www.google.com/search?q=far...ft:en-US:IE-Address&ie=&oe=#spf=1573001011855 and the first result is S.M.A.R.T. Laboratory
Located in the radiation measurements area, the Faraday cage shown is used to shield electromagnetic interference with testing prototype radiation detectors. The Faraday cage houses a custom vacuum chamber that allows for testing of semiconductor based charged particle spectrometers. The vacuum chamber is equipped with an LN2 cold finger stage and a rotating X-Y-Z sample manipulator. Feedthroughs allow biasing and test equipment to be located outside of the cage.
Click to expand...
Later results include a Faraday cage inside a vacuum chamber.
 
Last edited:
well, I'm guessing they didn't test for quantum fluctuations. Maybe you need more than a faraday cage to get it done.
 
Gibberish about testing for quantum fluctuations in a Faraday cage

pittsburghjoe said:
...
Click to expand...
6 November 2019 pittsburghjoe: Gibberish about testing for quantum fluctuations in a Faraday cage and his current delusion that quantum fluctuations can be removed.

A Faraday cage just stops external electromagnetic fields from entering the cage.
No one with any physics education (or who can read!) would test to see if quantum fluctuations exist or not in a Faraday cage. They are a fundamental property of QM. Heisenberg's uncertainty principle for time and energy says that particle-antiparticle pairs of virtual particles can appear anywhere without restrictions and we see their effects.
The Casimir effect is quantum fluctuations in a vacuum where boundary conditions create a pressure. For example two uncharged conductive plates in a vacuum would classically have no force between them. QM says there is a force and we measure it.
 
Last edited:
I'm fine with whatever it takes to get fluctuations to stop. The idea is to replicate space between galaxies ..that doesn't have spacetime.
 
pittsburghjoe said:
Isn't it strange we can track the gap between some galaxies spreading faster than the speed of light? Two galaxies are gaining distance so fast that it's quicker than light. Well, that's what they tell us ..and that it's fine that it is quicker than light because it's just the space between the objects going faster.

What? Nobody questions how weird this is?
Click to expand...

If that's what they were saying, I'd tell you that the universe is weird and that "weird" does not mean "untrue". However, since that's not what they are saying, I only need to say that instead.

It turns out that quantum fluctuations in empty space is proof spacetime is around. You aren't going to find it in empty space outside of galaxy. It's why the space outside a galaxy "expands" and nothing inside does.
Click to expand...

No, the reason why the galaxy itself doesn't expand is because its gravity is compensating for the expansion at that scale.
 
pittsburghjoe said:
I don't care so much about the speed thing as I do about the distance magically appearing.
Click to expand...

It's not magical. The universe is expanding. Spacetime is a function of the universe, and it's expanding along with it.

JeanTate, empty space has to be different outside a galaxy than inside. There is no denying it.
Click to expand...

Oh, there's denying it. You simply are wrong here.

I think we could create an interstellar drive by shooting matter waves
Click to expand...

What the hell are "matter waves"?
 
pittsburghjoe said:
I'm fine with whatever it takes to get fluctuations to stop. The idea is to replicate space between galaxies ..that doesn't have spacetime.
Click to expand...
Let me see: you have no scientific theory of your own, but you are vaguely unsatisfied with how physics seem to work, so you are fine with just about any suggestion that help you on the way. In order to do away with quantum mechanics, you are happy to invent intelligent particles, and non-physical elements, and now you are seeking something that can stop spacetime from existing outside galaxies.
 
I would love it if you said gravity is still holding the galaxy together ..because that would mean we could bottle spacetimeless field much, much closer to earth.
 
Is negative mass possible?

Is that what Dark Matter is? Could it be matter that doesn't have a physical state and has negative mass? Does light bend around Dark Matter in a normal way?

If we could edit an unobserved objects mass variable ..we could probably make hover-boards.
 
Last edited:
Usual ignorant delusions about quantum fluctuations and spacetime

pittsburghjoe said:
I'm fine with whatever it takes to get fluctuations to stop. The idea is to replicate space between galaxies ..that doesn't have spacetime.
Click to expand...
7 November 2019 pittsburghjoe: Usual ignorant delusions about quantum fluctuations and spacetime.

The utter stupidity of "replicate space between galaxies that doesn't have spacetime" is obvious - the space between galaxies is the space part of spacetime :jaw-dropp!
 
Abysmally ignorant delusion that we think galaxies are only their supermassive BH

pittsburghjoe said:
Nice try but we already know the gravity from the supermassive black hole isn't enough to keep a galaxy together.
Click to expand...
7 November 2019 pittsburghjoe: Abysmally ignorant delusion that we think galaxies are only their supermassive black hole :jaw-dropp!

He may think that but we know what a galaxy is. The Sun and stars exist in the Milky Way galaxy but apparently not in his head :p!

Everyone else in the world who has learned physics and astronomy knows that galaxies are billions of stars and plenty of gas. A star orbits in a galaxy according to Newton's law of gravitation. The mass of the many stars and the supermassive black hole inside the orbit effectively acts as a point mass so the orbit is roughly elliptical. The mass outside of the orbit perturbs the orbit so is unlikely that the orbit is perfectly elliptical.

Everyone else in the world who can read Wikipedia knows the facts about Sagittarius A* (mass of 3.7 million solar masses) and the Milky Way (mass of 100–400 billion stars).
 
Delusion that we would say that gravity is not holding the galaxy together

pittsburghjoe said:
I would love it if you said gravity is still holding the galaxy together ..because that would mean we could bottle spacetimeless field much, much closer to earth.
Click to expand...
7 November 2019 pittsburghjoe: Abysmally ignorant delusion that we would say that gravity is not holding the galaxy together.
Followed by incoherent gibberish.

Frequently Asked Questions in Cosmology
Gravity holds the Solar System together. That means that an expanding universe moves the Earth by 1 part in a septillion (1 followed by 17 zeroes) over the lifetime of the Solar System :jaw-dropp!
Gravity holds the Milky Way together. Thus the Milky Way does not expand when the universe expands.
Gravity holds the Local Group of galaxies together. Thus the Local Group of galaxies does not expand when the universe expands. There are even blue shifted galaxies close to us! The Andromeda Galaxy will collide with the Milky Way!
Gravity holds the Virgo Cluster of galaxies together. This is why they do not fall exactly on the straight line of Hubble's law. Gravity gives the Virgo Cluster galaxies varied and large enough velocities to make the cluster a noticeable scattering around the Hubble law.

Then there is electromagnetism usually stated as 39 orders of magnitude stronger than gravity. That is why the Earth and us do not expand as the universe expands!
 
pittsburghjoe said:
Is negative mass possible?

Is that what Dark Matter is? Could it be matter that doesn't have a physical state and has negative mass? Does light bend around Dark Matter in a normal way?

If we could edit an unobserved objects mass variable ..we could probably make hover-boards.
Click to expand...
Nah, it's just magic.

A.k.a. physics à la pittsburghjoe :)
 
Is it possible that the big bang and the start of spacetime are two separate events? We are finding out that inflation is a load of cr@p https://phys.org/news/2019-11-planck-space-observatory-universe-sphere.html

I'm thinking the big bang might not of happened at all. The quantum field (infinity) was instantly filled with atoms that were separated evenly. Somewhere in the middle of the universe, a sphere of spacetime was enacted that expanded at the speed of light. With spacetime comes gravity, so mega black holes formed the galaxies. That expanding spacetime sphere is what is expanding in the already existing quantum field.
 
Would the center of the universe (the spacetime sphere start), even be within the bounds of observable universe? I think it would be worthwhile to locate the center. Maybe we will find a cool trinket there.
 
pittsburghjoe said:
Would the center of the universe (the spacetime sphere start), even be within the bounds of observable universe? I think it would be worthwhile to locate the center. Maybe we will find a cool trinket there.
Click to expand...

Yeah, that’s correct.

And I know what that trinket is ... it’s a two-sided card-like thing. On one side the message is (the trinket knows what language you are most comfortable with, it’s magic, of course) “the statement on the other side is true”. Turn it over and the message is “the statement on the other side is false”.

In tiny, almost invisible print, on both sides “courtesy of pittsburghjoe”. :p
 
What if the big crunch is when the spacetime sphere decides to shrink back down? Would the distance between galaxies suddenly disappear? Would galaxies still exist at that point? Maybe what is required for the sphere to shrink is that all existing matter has to be smaller than a virus.
 
Usual ignorance, lies, delusions and gibberish

pittsburghjoe said:
Is it possible....
Click to expand...
7 November 2019 pittsburghjoe: Usual ignorance, lies, delusions and gibberish.

The Big Bang happened at a time t > 0 when spacetime existed. We have speculations about what happened at t <=0 and they have spacetime.

pittsburghjoe lies that Researchers claim data from Planck space observatory suggests universe is a sphere is about inflation. This is a paper about the shape of the universe. The consensus from measurements of the CMB is that the universe is either flat or has a very small curvature. The authors claim to have evidence for that very small curvature:
The researchers came to this conclusion after looking at data from the Planck space observatory that showed a discrepancy between the concentration of dark matter and dark energy and outward expansion; there was more gravitational lensing than theory has predicted. Such an imbalance, they claim, would have the universe collapsing in on itself, resulting in a sphere shape. Others who have looked at the same data prior to this new effort have called the data from the observatory a statistical fluke. The research trio note that there are other problems with the flat theory as well, such as scientists' inability to accurately measure the Hubble constant; each team that tries finds a different answer. There have also been problems with reconciling surveys of dark energy with a flat model. They conclude by acknowledging that with current technology there is no way to settle the debate—new devices will need to be invented that will be able to measure microwave background radiation in ways not subject to debate.
Click to expand...


pittsburghjoe has a delusion that the Big Bang could have not happened at all. There is an enormous amount of evidence that the Big Bang happened, e.g. the existence, temperature, black body and power spectrum of the CMB.

pittsburghjoe ends with ignorant gibberish.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom