So, not underage then.
So, not underage then.
The normal rules do apply.
You need to familiarize yourself with concepts like negligence, recklessness, and willful blindness, and why they are sufficient to establish both civil and criminal culpability for some crimes in the absence of strict intent.
It's truly bizarre to keep claiming that sex with someone too young to consent isn't a crime as long as you weren't sure the victim is too young. That's not what the law says. You need to be sure that she isn't.
"I didn't know" is especially likely to fall on deaf ears when there's substantial reason to believe she's probably underage...for instance, when the girl is ostensibly being pimped to you by a man who has an actual reputation for interest and trafficking in underage girls.
Another concept is strict liability: the act is the crime, regardless of intent. A common example is felony murder: if someone is killed during another felony, everybody involved gets charged, even if a specific person didn't kill or intend to kill anybody (as, say, the getaway driver at a bank robbery). It's truly bizarre to keep claiming that sex with someone too young to consent isn't a crime as long as you weren't sure the victim is too young. That's not what the law says. You need to be sure that she isn't.
https://www.nolo.com/legal-encyclopedia/what-common-strict-liability-crimes.html
https://www.nolo.com/legal-encyclopedia/what-common-strict-liability-crimes.html
https://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/Felony-Murder+Rule
Ever since the Bentley case in England (the 'let him have it' murder) it doesn't have felony murder UK equivalent. You can be an accessory to the crime instead.
It is for prostitution, even in the UK.
I'm surprised no one has posted the documentary of the Prince and the Paedophile here.
Essentially, it is Virginia Giuffre's side of the story, with another witness from South Africa also explaining how they were groomed and exploited by Epstein and Maxwell. It is pretty detailed, and intercut with Andrew Windsor's own claims. Giuffre comes across as quite convincing, but the Panorama is not uncritical of either women's claims pointing, out that there are some inaccuracies or inconsistencies with their stories.
There is also an interview with Alan Dershowtiz who is also implicated by one of the women in the documentary.
'Sex trafficking' is just the US euphemism for procuring an underage prostitute.
Epstein's network increases by the day.
This chart spawned from Crazy Days and Nights (CDAN) podcasts (Patreon Ep. 77 & Ep. 284) where he shared blinds and known facts. In addition,
other research was conducted and links to that research can be found throughout this chart in any of the font that is blue. Some of these details
are “alleged” and not 100% confirmed. Not every player confirmed and/or alleged may be in here but in time this will be updated.
Updated 7/15/19
Donald Trump is trying to distance himself from Prince Andrew (and, presumably, Epstein, who he described as a “terrific guy” and “a lot of fun to be with”), claiming not to know him, evidence to the contrary notwithstanding.
This is an interesting video which features a body language analysis of Prince Andrew's interview.
This is an interesting video which features a body language analysis of Prince Andrew's interview.
To be fair, there's a lot of people trying to distance themselves from Prince Andrew right now, and wondering how well they actually know him. And I can see Donald Trump meeting someone a few times at various functions, without ever really getting to know them.
President Donald Trump has claimed that he does not know Prince Andrew, but a recently resurfaced interview with People from 2000 says otherwise, showing Trump describing Andrew as "a lot of fun to be with."
“He’s not pretentious. He’s a lot of fun to be with,” Trump told People in 2000, speaking of Andrew. The article also states that Trump and Andrew, as well as Trump’s then-girlfriend Melania Knauss, had “chatted” at a Halloween costume party hosted by Heidi Klum in New York City in 2000.
Epstein's network increases by the day.
This is an interesting video which features a body language analysis of Prince Andrew's interview.
Hopefully you don't think everybody he's even spent time with is part of some sort of conspiracy.
Body language? Next you'll tell me the shape of his skull indicates that he's a pedophile.
Yes, indeed, why would the second son of the Queen of England be memorable at all? I think you're equivocating on the meaning of "know", by the way. Never mind, there's this:
If a ranch doesn't make any babies, is it still a "baby factory ranch?"
I'm going to start calling my place the "multi-platinum album recording studio" or maybe "time travel townhouse."
So real that it's admissible in court? Or so real that you accept that it's real when it agrees with you?Shows how ignorant you are.
(a) body language is real
This is an interesting video which features a body language analysis of Prince Andrew's interview.
Depends on the context. Apparently Epstein had big plans to run a birthing factory there. The plans never came to fruition, thankfully. I won't complain if you think that doesn't count. I'm still going to use the epithet, though.
So real that it's admissible in court? Or so real that you accept that it's real when it agrees with you?
I watched some of it. What I saw focused on his spoken language, not his body language. I'm not really interested in watching the whole thing, it's kind of long. Where does it focus on the body language?
Yeah, but it's important to be "fair" to claims made by Donald Trump, noted fair person and truth teller.
Yeah, but it's important to be "fair" to claims made by Donald Trump, noted fair person and truth teller.
Shows how ignorant you are.
(a) body language is real
(b) a paedophile is a person attracted to little children.
Police witnesses are trained to be entiely objective.
It immediately becomes clear that body language can be objective evidence in court.