The world is controlled by the Rothschilds. Period.

philippeb8 said:
Wake up and watch the news then. The UN already decides who is allowed to immigrate to Canada, thanks to Trudeau a Liberal (sarcasm). We’re not even deciding our own fate anymore.
Click to expand...

I'm pretty sure that Trudeau is actually a Liberal (no sarcasm). I have no idea what your issues are regarding immigration, since you haven't stated them.

philippeb8 said:
If Hillary Clinton would have been elected then it would be the same for United States by now! Luckily Trump stopped that from happening.
Click to expand...

I think that if Russia hadn't interfered and got Trump elected, then Hillary would've accomplished an unimaginative but competent presidency that a) wouldn't have bent over backwards to serve Russia for personal gain, b) wouldn't have kicked America's allies in the nuts, c) would've benefited Americans in general, and d) wouldn't have fomented the destructive divide that exists between Americans today. This is just a few of the obvious things. Let's not even talk about the tariffs that are absolutely contrary to any concept of fiscal conservatism.

I stand by my previous assessment that you uncritically accept alt-right BS and have no clue what you're talking about.
 
The thing about the Rothschilds is that they probably did have outsize influence back in the 1800s, because of their enormous wealth at the time. But wealthy families tend to procreate, and the fortune gets diluted by all the descendants. Look at the Kennedys for an example. Joe P was once one of the wealthiest men in the US. In 1957, Fortune put him in the $200-400 million bracket; only 8 people were ranked in higher brackets.

But Joe P. had 9 children and 31 grandchildren and who knows how many great grandchildren, and now none of that Kennedy clan is ranked anywhere near the top in wealth (there is a very wealthy Kennedy, but he is not related).
 
philippeb8 said:
Well you can’t understand the videos or simple mathematics so you’re a lost cause.
Click to expand...

If I had such big, awesome solutions to classic physics problems, I wouldn't be arguing them here. So what's wrong with you?

This is one reason why no one believes you, but even larger is that you don't show your math.

I mean show your math or go home.
 
eerok said:
If I had such big, awesome solutions to classic physics problems, I wouldn't be arguing them here. So what's wrong with you?



This is one reason why no one believes you, but even larger is that you don't show your math.



I mean show your math or go home.
Click to expand...



Everything is in the Cosmoquest thread except the rotation curve and the experiment proposal.
 
Aidoneus said:
This. This right here is what I come to this forum for.
Click to expand...

The unintended comedy is unmatched however he might be only pretending to be 'lucid'. We'll know when he starts putting up the maths.
 
philippeb8 said:
Wake up and watch the news then. The UN already decides who is allowed to immigrate to Canada, thanks to Trudeau a Liberal (sarcasm). We’re not even deciding our own fate anymore.

If Hillary Clinton would have been elected then it would be the same for United States by now! Luckily Trump stopped that from happening.
Click to expand...

Jesus **** ******* Christ. The UN doesn't decide anything. I have watched UN peacekeepers trying to determine if they can respond to a village's call for help based on who was attaching them. Their mandate you see was to prevent violations of a cease fire agreement and they could only intervene if the correct group was attacking them. The UN is so democratic (note the small "d") that it is completely paralyzed (I was in Central African Republic at the time if you're curious). They can't even tell themselves what to do.

Trump didn't stop anything. In truth he's made the world more dangerous. He has caused doubt in the US commitment to Article 5 of the NATO Charter which opens Russian calculus to the possibility that we won't meet our treaty obligations in the Baltic States and Poland, pushing the world closer to nuclear war.

You also obviously don't know what you're talking about. The UN has never dictated how many refugees we or any nation take in or from where. People who are really refugees from conflict who end up going to the US actually are disappointed because we have always (think pre-9/11) taken the longest to adjudicate applications and are the most likely to deny a resettlement package.

The things you don't know about how governments and world organizations work and act are so fundamental I can't understand how you'd think you should voice opinions about them. Anyone who thinks the UN controls anything should spend some time around the Blue Helmets.

*All that being said, I have the deepest respect and admiration for the people of UN Agencies attempting to conduct peace keeping, peace enforcement; peace support; and disarmament, demobilization, repatriation, reintegration and resettlement operations in post conflict environments. They go to some of the worst places in the world to stop wars not of their making, help families who are not their own, and go in knowing that they've been set up for failure.
 
philippeb8 said:
Please don’t bring that same racism / sexism / homophobic / xenophobic narrative alright? My girlfriend is from Morocco so you’re the one heavily brainwashed.

And if you trust Einstein then please explain to me:
- Where is dark energy coming from?
- Why can’t we create an infinitely dense spot with dark matter since it doesn’t interact with normal matter?
- If galaxies are rotating then this implies the universe has an absolute frame of reference, right?

See: General Relativity makes no sense at all. Please don’t be so naïve.
Click to expand...

How many countries have you visited? Would you mind telling us in general terms, what your occupation is and you educational background?
 
philippeb8 said:
You can’t publish scientific theories like a bestseller.
Click to expand...

.....didn't you already publish in 2011.

Finite Theory of the Universe, Dark Matter Disproof and Faster-Than-Light
Given that General Relativity was disproved yesterday September 23, 2011, I bring Finite Theory to replace it with. Finite Theory works well with famous experiments such as the gravitational light bending, the perihelion precession disparity for all planets, is the only theory to provide a solution for the rotation curve for all galaxies and even explains the constitution of a black hole. A presentation, the paper and the simulator I used can be found here (best viewed with Mozilla Firefox):
 
philippeb8 said:
It's very simple because the Rothschilds family the billionaire class is owning more than 80% of the world's wealth and therefore is about to already controls financially the entire world.

They in turn control the politicians, the medias and the social medias brainwashing us on a daily basis.
Click to expand...

Fixed that for you. Vote one Sanders to fix the rigged economy.
 
This poster is obviously trying to bait Philippe Sereys de Rothschild into silencing him forever, methinks! Be careful what you wish for OP!
 
Didn't you publish this anti-Albert Einstein book in 2014?

Imagine If Einstein Was Wrong (2014)
"In this book a new mathematical model is being suggested which is based on the classical mechanics. The theory is objective and predicts low scale GPS gravitational time dilation, perihelion precession disparity, gravitational light bending, artificial faster-than-light motion, up to the rotation curve for all galaxies, natural faster-than-light galactic expansion and can consequently be used to determine the ultimate scale of the Universe. In practical terms, this means: * We can achieve infinite speed using basic nuclear fusion reactors with the adequate technology to cancel the effects of the gravitons. * We can also attain time travel into the future with some small pod having an increased flux of gravitons travelling through. * It follows levitation also derives from the theory. You will also find many reasons why General Relativity is wrong and how to verify this experimentally!"

https://www.amazon.com/Imagine-If-Einstein-Was-Wrong/dp/1496924037
 
Matthew Ellard said:
Didn't you publish this anti-Albert Einstein book in 2014?



Imagine If Einstein Was Wrong (2014)

"In this book a new mathematical model is being suggested which is based on the classical mechanics. The theory is objective and predicts low scale GPS gravitational time dilation, perihelion precession disparity, gravitational light bending, artificial faster-than-light motion, up to the rotation curve for all galaxies, natural faster-than-light galactic expansion and can consequently be used to determine the ultimate scale of the Universe. In practical terms, this means: * We can achieve infinite speed using basic nuclear fusion reactors with the adequate technology to cancel the effects of the gravitons. * We can also attain time travel into the future with some small pod having an increased flux of gravitons travelling through. * It follows levitation also derives from the theory. You will also find many reasons why General Relativity is wrong and how to verify this experimentally!"



https://www.amazon.com/Imagine-If-Einstein-Was-Wrong/dp/1496924037
Click to expand...



I published intermediate versions but the new one will be final.
 
Matthew Ellard said:
Didn't you publish this anti-Albert Einstein book in 2014?

Imagine If Einstein Was Wrong (2014)
"In this book a new mathematical model is being suggested which is based on the classical mechanics. The theory is objective and predicts low scale GPS gravitational time dilation, perihelion precession disparity, gravitational light bending, artificial faster-than-light motion, up to the rotation curve for all galaxies, natural faster-than-light galactic expansion and can consequently be used to determine the ultimate scale of the Universe. In practical terms, this means: * We can achieve infinite speed using basic nuclear fusion reactors with the adequate technology to cancel the effects of the gravitons. * We can also attain time travel into the future with some small pod having an increased flux of gravitons travelling through. * It follows levitation also derives from the theory. You will also find many reasons why General Relativity is wrong and how to verify this experimentally!"

https://www.amazon.com/Imagine-If-Einstein-Was-Wrong/dp/1496924037
Click to expand...

One customer review. “Rubbish” :D. Probably the only person who bought the book.
 
Last edited:
Originally Posted by philippeb8
It's very simple because the Rothschilds family the billionaire class is owning more than 80% of the world's wealth and therefore is about to already controls financially the entire world.

They in turn control the politicians, the medias and the social medias brainwashing us on a daily basis.
Click to expand...

Sideroxylon said:
Fixed that for you. Vote one Sanders to fix the rigged economy.
Click to expand...

No. The combined wealth of the world's billionaires is approximately 2.5% of the planet's wealth, so not even close.
 
Last edited:
If you guys are so smart then answer this thought experiment:

If you have an empty universe with 1 star and 1 planet then which body will rotate around which and can the star have a spin of its own?

I want to hear intelligent answers please. Not rants!
 
trustbutverify said:
No. The combined wealth of the world's billionaires is approximately 2.5% of the planet's wealth, so not even close.
Click to expand...

By golly. That would make old mate OP’s numbers on the (((Rothschild)))) family a bit out.

Still need to vote for (((Sanders))) to fix the rigged economy.
 
philippeb8 said:
You haven’t even watched the Europe’s Doom video so I don’t think you will bother following real news like all the acid attacks on a weekly basis in England, the burning churches in France or the girls raped in Germany by the migrants.
Click to expand...

I HATE IMMIGRANTS!
philippeb8 said:
I’ve been researching the subject for the last 8 years and I’m freely sharing my conclusions which I think are 90% right.

According to you voting for the left wing Democrats with their open borders, post-birth abortions, sanctuary cities and transgenders competing against women agenda is a perfectly normal logic?!?
Click to expand...

I HATE IMMIGRANTS!

philippeb8 said:
Wake up and watch the news then. The UN already decides who is allowed to immigrate to Canada, thanks to Trudeau a Liberal (sarcasm). We’re not even deciding our own fate anymore.

If Hillary Clinton would have been elected then it would be the same for United States by now! Luckily Trump stopped that from happening.
Click to expand...

I HATE IMMIGRANTS!

philippeb8 said:
My girlfriend is from Morocco
Click to expand...

I....errrr..I...cough cough splutter...LOOK! EINSTEIN!
 
giphy.gif
 
tusenfem said:
it's non-arian jewish physics of course, so it must be evil and wrong
(I think we've been there already, like about 90 years ago)
Click to expand...

Don’t mind me. A very infrequent visitor to C&CT. This Rothschild stuff still popular or is this an anachronism?
 
tusenfem said:
it's non-arian jewish physics of course, so it must be evil and wrong
(I think we've been there already, like about 90 years ago)
Click to expand...

You know, I never really made that connection as to WHY so many CT-ers also have a go at General Relativity, but now that you mention it that makes sense.

Oh and philippeb8, according to your fringe colleagues in this forum 'simple mathematics' prove that the universe runs on electricity or on special hydrogen states or on a thus far undetected flow of something. They all disagree with each other and with your hypothesis.

Have you ever considered that apart from being wrong about the whole 'tha jooos run the world' thing, you are also wrong that something as complex as the universe can be explained by simple maths?
 
Lukraak_Sisser said:
You know, I never really made that connection as to WHY so many CT-ers also have a go at General Relativity, but now that you mention it that makes sense.

Oh and philippeb8, according to your fringe colleagues in this forum 'simple mathematics' prove that the universe runs on electricity or on special hydrogen states or on a thus far undetected flow of something. They all disagree with each other and with your hypothesis.

Have you ever considered that apart from being wrong about the whole 'tha jooos run the world' thing, you are also wrong that something as complex as the universe can be explained by simple maths?
Click to expand...

I have met antisemites with a need to cut Einstein down to size. Right from the innocuous sounding opinions that his place in science history is overstated. When that same person also goes on about the Rothschild family and jews in Hollywood, it is clear what the motives are.
 
philippeb8 said:
So I have the exact solution for the:
- time dilation cancelation altitude
- perihelion precession
- light bending
- rotation curve (now)

And I can explain the:
- expansion of the universe
- mass of the invisible universe

In order to achieve this I’m basically saying the last 300 years of physics are all wrong.
Click to expand...

And we await your Nobel prize with great anticipation.
 
philippeb8 said:
You’re just buying time. I have a book that will be released soon with all the mathematical evidence where the rotation curve turns out to be the easiest problem to solve despite a century of unsuccessful attempts by scientists trying to solve it.
Click to expand...

Which either implies that they're all idiots, or that they're in on some global science conspiracy for... reasons, I guess.

philippeb8 said:
I don’t think I’ll need a deep peer review
Click to expand...

I'd bet that you are well aware that it wouldn't pass muster.

because it is simple calculus and very easy to understand for all those with a basic background in science.
Click to expand...

That should be a big flashing warning sign to you: if it's so simple that everybody would understand it, we wouldn't have spent centuries trying to find the solution.
 
Cavemonster said:
I watched a bit of your first video.

It claims to be reading the text of a letter written in 1871 that among other things, specifically mentions the Nazis, a group which would not exist for some time and a term which would be first used in 1926, and zionists, a group which would not exist until 1897.

Other than the word of the narrator, what makes you believe that this letter exists? Its claims are extraordinary. If a letter from that year could be confirmed to be legitimate and mention both Nazis and Zionists by name, that would indeed be compelling.

The narrator later says that the word "Nazi-ism" was known to illuminati at that time, decades before the party or term existed. But again that's his assertion. By what evidence do you hold that his assertions, including the authorship of the letter, are true?
Click to expand...

The "1871 letter mentioning Nazis" is apparently the old Albert Pike's 3 World Wars Letter Hoax. Short version is that the references to Nazis, Communists, Zionists, etc., are from a 1956 book by William Guy Carr, who was interpreting and paraphrasing a letter from 1871 written by Albert Pike; a letter which even Carr admitted he hadn't seen and couldn't trace.

Yeah; and reading this sort of thing in a video is what Phillipe considers evidence.
 
philippeb8 said:
You can’t even draw the distinction between legal and illegal immigrants. Typical left winger.
Click to expand...

You were complaining that the average Chinese immigrant makes more money than the average white Canadian because 'a minority shouldn't have more money than 'us''.
Are you implying that all these Chinese Canadians are illegal, or is whether or not someone got to Canada legally perhaps not your main gripe?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom