Mueller Investigation pt 7

The Roger Stone – Wikileaks – Russia Hoax

Craig Murray said:
As ever, the Guardian wins the prize for the most tendentious reporting of Roger Stone’s conviction. This is not quite on the scale of its massive front page lie that Paul Manafort visited Julian Assange in the Ecuadorean Embassy. But it is a lie with precisely the same intent, to deceive the public into believing there were links between Wikileaks and the Trump campaign. There were no such links. [...]
Click to expand...


Must read, Black Knights.
 
Here's the latest big new lie to pay attention to.

Trump is still trying to sell the lie that the whole Mueller investigation was a witch hunt, (never mind the convictions and guilty pleas). So he has directed his minion, Barr, to investigate the initial FISA warrant to spy on Carter Page.

So it has been leaked? announced? to the press that the investigation has uncovered some supposed altered document by an FBI agent that was submitted to the court for the FISA warrant. Oooouuu, the smoking gun!

But oddly enough this leak/announcement was tossed out there to simmer with the implication it is some big important thing (even though it has already been suggested the alteration was insignificant). The actual mystery of what this is won't be released until Dec 9th.

The Hill (which I have lost confidence in, sorry for using their summary).
An FBI official is being investigated after allegedly altering a document connected to surveillance of a 2016 Trump campaign aide, CNN reported Thursday, citing people briefed on the matter.

The alleged altering was reportedly discovered as part of Justice Department Inspector General Michael Horowitz's probe into whether the FBI followed the law and its own policies while applying for a warrant to surveil a former Trump campaign official Carter Page during the 2016 election.

Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) said this week that a report of Horowitz's findings was expected to be released Dec. 9.
Click to expand...

Fox is playing this up, of course.

NYPost Washington Post quietly changes story on altered Russia probe document
I can't find the WA Po article but a lot of people don't have access to it anyway.
The Washington Post deleted a key detail from its reporting about the FBI lawyer accused of altering a document related to the surveillance of a former Trump campaign adviser, according to a new report.

The newspaper nixed a portion of its story that identified the lawyer as an FBI employee underneath Peter Strzok, the ousted FBI agent who worked on the feds’ investigation into Russian election meddling, Fox News reported.

The update was made just after midnight Friday without explanation.

The lawyer in question is accused of fudging the document related to the FBI’s Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act court warrant application to surveil Carter Page in 2016.

The altered paperwork, however, did not change the validity of the warrant, according to the Washington Post. Two officials told the newspaper that the lawyer was forced out over the incident.
Click to expand...


So what do you do with a smoking gun that isn't really smoking? You hint and tease that you found this incriminating thing for ~3 weeks so that is sinks in that the FISA warrant was obtained using fraudulent information. And once that sinks into the subconscious of the believers, you release the actual detail that said finding was a 'nothing burger' at a time when, in a few months people will forget that part and only remember the claim something fraudulent was found.

NPR: Initial beliefs are hard to dislodge.

And yes, GOP marketers are well aware of this. Trump has people working for him that are also aware.
 
Armitage72 said:
In literature, a black knight conceals their heraldry (identity) to perform misdeeds while being protected by their anonymity.
Click to expand...

Yeah, but Empress has the Monty Python and the Holy Grail Black Knight in mind.
 
Skeptic Ginger said:
Here's the latest big new lie to pay attention to.

Trump is still trying to sell the lie that the whole Mueller investigation was a witch hunt, (never mind the convictions and guilty pleas). So he has directed his minion, Barr, to investigate the initial FISA warrant to spy on Carter Page.
Click to expand...


Your TDS is preventing you from understanding simple facts. The FISA investigation started 11 months before Barr was sworn in.
 
Skeptic Ginger said:
:boggled: Something tells me you need catching up on current events.
Click to expand...

The technical point that the IG review of the FISA warrant began in March 2018 is correct.

Barr opened an inquiry (now technically a "criminal probe") into the SC Russia investigation in May 2019, headed by John Durham.

It should be noted, however, Bogative's technicality completely misses the overall thrust of your point. Nor is it remotely appropriate to leap to the conclusion that you made the error do to some kind of derangement. It's just a slightly different way of parroting the claim that everyone who doesn't like Trump is "biased." Totally unoriginal.

The entire gambit echoes the exact situation in front of us. One lawyer fudging some records doesn't invalidate the warrant, nor does mixing up which specific investigation it was Barr initiated therefore invalidate the claim that Barr has enacted an "investigate the investigators" strategy.
 
The DoJ Inspector General's report is out - it comprehensively and definitively shoots down any idea of a Deep State conspiracy theory to spy on the Trump campaign.

1. The decision to open the Crossfire Hurricane investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 Presidential election was correctly and properly opened, predicated on actual evidence that a foreign power, namely Russia, was influencing the Trump campaign, and was attempting to interfere 2016 election.

2. The decision to open the investigations into George Papadopoulos, Carter Page, Paul Manafort and Michael Flynn were correctly and properly opened, predicated on actual evidence of wrongdoing.

3. The investigations were opened because of a tip from a foreign country, namely Australia. The Steele Dossier had nothing whatsoever to do with the opening of any investigations.

4. There was no evidence, either in documentation, or testimony, that any of the investigations were influenced by political bias on the part of anyone involved in the investigations.​

Its a slam dunk, but of course, Trump's DoJ stooge Bill Barr will reject it because it doesn't say what he wanted it it say. Expect another investigation to be started soon. I expect he will keep doing this until he either gets what he wants or runs out of time.

tanabear's pet theory that the investigations were some sort of "insurance policy" is hurtling to the ground in flames - its bollocks, and it always was bollocks.

Full report here: https://context-cdn.washingtonpost....note/3b009e27-d246-4798-ad7d-9b43c0f61194.pdf

Read it and weep Trump Trash!


ETA: Here is a brief video in which former DEA Administrator Chuck Rosenburg discusses the FBI guidelines for beginning an investigation
(The whole video is 7:28, Rosenburg begins at 5:25

http://www.msnbc.com/msnbc/watch/ag...s-backing-opening-of-russia-probe-74782789550
 
Last edited:
smartcooky said:
The DoJ Inspector General's report is out - it comprehensively and definitively shoots down any idea of a Deep State conspiracy theory to spy on the Trump campaign.
Click to expand...

It must really be embarrassing when autocrats can't even get their underlings to get them the results they ask for.

Its a slam dunk, but of course, Trump's DoJ stooge Bill Barr will reject it because it doesn't say what he wanted it it say. Expect another investigation to be started soon.
Click to expand...

Which makes Trump's complaints that the Democrats are engaged in a pointless witch hunt* and that they should focus on getting the job done quite ironic.

* : A witch hunt that has caught several witches, and which doesn't even fit the definition of a witch hint in the first place.
 
You can expect Trump supporters to continue claiming Trump's campaign was spied on regardless of the report's findings. Trump will never acknowledge the report's findings as accurate. It would not be surprising if he now begins to claim the IG investigation was biased and fixed.
 
smartcooky said:
The DoJ Inspector General's report is out - it comprehensively and definitively shoots down any idea of a Deep State conspiracy theory to spy on the Trump campaign.



1. The decision to open the Crossfire Hurricane investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 Presidential election was correctly and properly opened, predicated on actual evidence that a foreign power, namely Russia, was influencing the Trump campaign, and was attempting to interfere 2016 election.



2. The decision to open the investigations into George Papadopoulos, Carter Page, Paul Manafort and Michael Flynn were correctly and properly opened, predicated on actual evidence of wrongdoing.



3. The investigations were opened because of a tip from a foreign country, namely Australia. The Steele Dossier had nothing whatsoever to do with the opening of any investigations.



4. There was no evidence, either in documentation, or testimony, that any of the investigations were influenced by political bias on the part of anyone involved in the investigations.​



Its a slam dunk, but of course, Trump's DoJ stooge Bill Barr will reject it because it doesn't say what he wanted it it say. Expect another investigation to be started soon. I expect he will keep doing this until he either gets what he wants or runs out of time.



tanabear's pet theory that the investigations were some sort of "insurance policy" is hurtling to the ground in flames - its bollocks, and it always was bollocks.



Full report here: https://context-cdn.washingtonpost....note/3b009e27-d246-4798-ad7d-9b43c0f61194.pdf



Read it and weep Trump Trash!
Click to expand...

That "other investigation" already started and is being run by John Durham. Signals seen in drafts of the IG report and anonymous comments indicate that in responses to IG inquiries, he provided no evidence supporting any of the "insurance policy" nonsense. Where his beliefs lay is anyone's guess, but even Barr's hand-picked investigator seems to not be pushing the narrative they want.
 
Barr is lying is bare ass off in his statement about the IG report.
This is completely unprecedented.

The only possible explanation at this point is that Trump has some Kompromat on him involving waterfowl and cream cheese.
 
Barr's statement:

The Inspector General's report now makes clear that the FBI launched an intrusive investigation of a U.S. presidential campaign on the thinnest of suspicions that, in my view, were insufficient to justify the steps taken.
Click to expand...
 
Stacyhs said:
You can expect Trump supporters to continue claiming Trump's campaign was spied on regardless of the report's findings. Trump will never acknowledge the report's findings as accurate. It would not be surprising if he now begins to claim the IG investigation was biased and fixed.
Click to expand...

...and the IG declared to be a "never Trumper".
 
Delphic Oracle said:
Barr's statement:
Click to expand...

It's time to realise that facts don't matter. Not figuratively, but literally.

This is like when the Mueller report painted a damning picture of the Trump campaign and administration, and Trump said it complely exonerated him, or when he keeps telling us to read the transcript that shows that he extorted another country for political dirt.

It doesn't matter anymore. We've moved beyond facts into a new realm of chaos.
 
What Belz said.

All source of facts have been destroyed, dismissable as bias or fake news.

All forms of argumentatives have been destroyed, trolling has been perfected to the point that it can shut down any argument it wants.

It is impossible to present information or share it or to argue for it. The tiny fringe of reality deniers that used to live on the margins are now in the center.

We are in a post-truth world.
 
It is a Constitutional Crisis when the AG lies about the work of the FBI on a critical case with overwhelmingly evidence to the contrary.
 
The Great Zaganza said:
It is a Constitutional Crisis when the AG lies about the work of the FBI on a critical case with overwhelmingly evidence to the contrary.
Click to expand...

Trump causes 37 Constitutional Crisis before breakfast.

Again... you can't have lies in a world without facts.
 
Despite what I said just hours ago, looks like Durham is now walking point.

Our investigation has included developing information from other persons and entities, both in the U.S. and outside of the U.S. Based on the evidence collected to date, and while our investigation is ongoing, last month we advised the Inspector General that we do not agree with some of the report’s conclusions as to predication and how the FBI case was opened.
Click to expand...

Again, he did not support this contention by sharing any of the evidence he claims to have with the IG.
 
Last edited:
Belz... said:
Post-fact. People are free to choose their truth. It is, in fact, truth that has killed fact.
Click to expand...

I would call it Truthism rather than Truth.

We are now in a world where nothing we are told can be believed, it is almost impossible without knowing primary sources if what you are being told about is real or not.

JayUtah stated in my signature that It must be fun to lead a life completely unburdened by reality, but we are all fast getting there, where reality and truth will be nothing more that what we choose to believe from whom we choose to believe it, and no one's truth and reality will be allowed to be any more real than anyone else's chosen truth and reality.
 
Last edited:
Sadly, Trump supporters will believe Barr and Trump over the actual IG report. They'll believe this:

White House Press Secretary Stephanie Grisham said in a statement: "The shocking report from the DOJ Inspector General shows an out-of-control FBI under President Obama and former Director Jim Comey."

President Trump, meanwhile, called the FBI's conduct "a disgrace" and said it was "far worse than ever thought possible."
Click to expand...
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/fi...eleases-findings-on-russia-probe-surveillance

Lindsey Graham is also maintaining his position as a Trump brown noser:

Graham started the presser by arguing that “the point I want to make is: let’s assume for a moment it started out OK, it sure as hell didn’t end OK.”

Despite acknowledging that “there may be reasonable differences about whether there was a lawful predicate,” Graham said that “not only did the system got off the rails” but in his view became a “criminal enterprise.”
Click to expand...
“Not only did the system go off the rails, but in my view became a criminal enterprise to defraud the FISA court, to deny American citizen Carter Page’s constitutional rights and to continue an operation against President Trump — as President of the United States — that I think was fundamentally flawed and unlawful,” Graham said, before saying that “these are statements I don’t make lightly” and are “based on the findings of the report.”
Click to expand...
https://talkingpointsmemo.com/news/graham-reaction-doj-ig-report

What a putz.
 
Trebuchet said:
Graham has long been rumored to be gay. I wonder if the Russkies have provided Trump with some evidence. [/conspiracy theory]
Click to expand...

It would not surprise me if Trump had something over a lot of those who fawn over him in Congress (Nunes, Gaetz, Meadows etc). It would certainly go a long way to explaining some of their perfidy
 
I couldn't care less of Graham is gay or not. Irrelevant to me...but to his Southern Baptist constituents, it would matter.
 
Last edited:
smartcooky said:
It would not surprise me if Trump had something over a lot of those who fawn over him in Congress (Nunes, Gaetz, Meadows etc). It would certainly go a long way to explaining some of their perfidy
Click to expand...

Its more fear of being "Primaried" and losing their seats then anything else.
In the US rank and file party members vote directly for who is to be their party's candidate;it's not like in the UK where party officals really have the power to decide who is running.
 
Last edited:
Stacyhs said:
I couldn't care less of Graham is gay or not. Irrelevant to me...but to his Southern Baptist constituents, it would matter.
Click to expand...


Nah.

He'd just beg forgiveness. Claim he found Jesus again. Mebbe go to a pray-the-gay-away re-education camp for a month. Somewhere with Jacuzzis and wet bars in the en suite private cabins, probably.

All forgiven and forgotten.

The only unforgivable transgressions are to be a Democrat and/or say something disparaging about Trump.
 
Accusing the FBI of anti-Trump bias might be less about 2016 and more about ongoing and future Investigations into Trump.
 
smartcooky said:
It would not surprise me if Trump had something over a lot of those who fawn over him in Congress (Nunes, Gaetz, Meadows etc). It would certainly go a long way to explaining some of their perfidy
Click to expand...
Maybe a few people, like he knows the Russians donated to McConnell's campaigns.

But Nunes and Gaetz are definitely groupies.
 
quadraginta said:
Nah.

He'd just beg forgiveness. Claim he found Jesus again. Mebbe go to a pray-the-gay-away re-education camp for a month. Somewhere with Jacuzzis and wet bars in the en suite private cabins, probably..
Click to expand...
This is alt-right Trumpies we are talking about here, he'd simply deny, deep fake videos or whatever. Real reality is not a requirement.
 
PhantomWolf said:
I would call it Truthism rather than Truth.

We are now in a world where nothing we are told can be believed, it is almost impossible without knowing primary sources if what you are being told about is real or not.

JayUtah stated in my signature that It must be fun to lead a life completely unburdened by reality, but we are all fast getting there, where reality and truth will be nothing more that what we choose to believe from whom we choose to believe it, and no one's truth and reality will be allowed to be any more real than anyone else's chosen truth and reality.
Click to expand...

The above is exactly what I meant by "truth". :)
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom