The Theory of Relativity will begin to fall apart in 2016/2017 - Part III

[halleyscomet]

Originally Posted by Gamolon

So what happened to the other two universities and the two (at least two) survey companies you asked to take readings?

I'm sure he has excuses for each one. For example:

[Gamolon]

Originally Posted by halleyscomet

I'm sure he has excuses for each one. For example:

[Reality Check]

Originally Posted by Bjarne

TR is not capable to comprehend physic responsible for :...

14 January 2020 Bjarne: Usual ignorant delusions and lies about "TR" (theory of relativity)
The main delusion is that his RR, etc, delusions that comprehend nothing are supported by gaps in mainstream comprehension. Lot of lies about non-relativistic phenomena, e.g. the origins of oceans.

1. The debated dark flow is comprehended as an effect of gravity from mass outside of the visible universe.
2. GR explains dark energy (a positive cosmological constant).
3. Dark matter as non-baryonic particles is the realm of quantum mechanics.
4. Repeats an deluded lie that the Pioneer Anomalies are no comprehended as a thermal recoil effect.
5. 'Oumuamua's non-gravitational acceleration is possibly solar radiation pressure.
6. The Allais Effect has been debunked.
7. "The planet X inclination pattern" gibberish.
   There is no planet called X. There were proposed Planet X's to explain orbital irregularities that lead to the discovery of Pluto. There is suggestions of massive trans-Neptunian objects that are labeled "Planet X"'s.
8. "Spooky Alignment of Quasars Across Billions of Light-years" is not relativity.
9. "Mysterious Ring Galaxies" is not relativity.
10. A "Arp. Halton Controversy" lie.
    Arp. Halton had invalid ideas about quasars, e.g. being ejected from galaxies because he basically imagined alignments. There was no controversy because his invalid ideas were ignored.
11. "Mysterious dance of dwarf galaxies" is not relativity.
12. A "Jupiter's Migration Miracle" lie and not relativity .
    Models using Newtonian gravity show that the current Solar System results from a Jupiter migrating from closer to the Sun from the textbook physics of interaction with Saturn, etc.
13. A "Extrasolar Hot Jupiter: Planets That 'Shouldn’t Exist'" lie and not relativity .
    Hot Jupiters were a surprising discovery with current explanations.
14. The origins of Earth's oceans is not relativity !
15. The history of Mercury is not relativity !
16. A deluded "what we have is noting as speculation" lie about the origin of the Moon and not relativity!
    Origin of the Moon
17. "Mysterious Ultra-Red Galaxies" are not relativity.
18. A deluded "how did some galaxies without dark matter form" question and not relativity.
19. "More than 99,9999999999999999999 % of the universe, we dont understand" insanity.
    We understand close to 100% of the universe - that is the Lambda-CDM cosmology model + the Standard Model.

[halleyscomet]

I'd like to ask everyone to lay off Bjarne for a bit. He just gave us a good hunk of content with the whole "Dark Flow proven by eclipse" storyline, but now that the eclipse has passed and there are no readings to discuss, trying to drag out that arc will just result in increasingly sad "excuses for the plot holes" posts like the one below:

Originally Posted by Bjarne

Yes but invoice for the repair was first pay last week, so the meter was send back too late

Let's all give Bjarne a rest so he can come up with some new content. I'm largely pleased with how the last arc played out, even though it ended with more of a whimper than anything else. If we keep harping on the lackluster conclusion it will only draw out efforts to either continue the storyline or worse yet, encourage Bjarne to try and use it as the basis for the next arc. There isn't enough meat on those bones for another arc. Anything else derived from it will be a thin broth indeed.

[MRC_Hans]

Agreed.

Hans

[malbui]

I'm happy for Bjarne to stay on as showrunner, but I reckon he needs to bring in a really top-notch script editor to keep things tight and avoid repetition, and also hire a good scientific advisor to make sure the pseudoscience at least sounds coherent and vaguely plausible.

Might also be worth planning a season of say 10 really chunky episodes rather than a full 23-episode run that risks getting flabby in the middle.

[halleyscomet]

Originally Posted by malbui

I'm happy for Bjarne to stay on as showrunner, but I reckon he needs to bring in a really top-notch script editor to keep things tight and avoid repetition, and also hire a good scientific advisor to make sure the pseudoscience at least sounds coherent and vaguely plausible.

Might also be worth planning a season of say 10 really chunky episodes rather than a full 23-episode run that risks getting flabby in the middle.

I disagree on the need for a science advisor. Bjarne’s complete disconnect from real science is the core of the humor. It would be like having Archie from “Duffy’s Tavern” consult a dictionary before speaking or having Cliff Calvin fact check. Having Bjarne work with someone who actually understands science at a layman’s level or better would ruin the joke.

I agree with you on the need for tighter runs. This one, despite the flabby finish, was tight, fast, and stuck to the core until just before the end. We’ve had a LOT of flabby, haphazard episodes from Bjarne. I think the first 85% to 90% of this run should be Bjarne’s targeted quality level from here on out.

[Mojo]

The next eclipse isn’t until June, so Bjarne should have plenty of time to get everything ready.

[Robin]

As far as I know Bjarne is not doing this with any intention to troll.

The fact that he often makes insulting comments doesn't mean we have to be insulting in return.

No virtue signalling here, I have been joining in on pile-ons quite a lot in the past, I have often been one of the worst offenders.

[halleyscomet]

Originally Posted by Robin

As far as I know Bjarne is not doing this with any intention to troll.



The fact that he often makes insulting comments doesn't mean we have to be insulting in return.



No virtue signalling here, I have been joining in on pile-ons quite a lot in the past, I have often been one of the worst offenders.

I am convinced he is trolling. I do not believe for one second that he is sincere. I am playing along with what I consider to be an obvious piece of extended performance art. I am not trying to be insulting or mean. I am trying to offer sincere and constructive feedback to someone who is putting a lot of effort into a comedy routine.

[Reality Check]

Originally Posted by Bjarne

... DTU's CG 5 was in USA for calibration, and was not home 10 January .

He mentions the DTU which first appeared in this thread over a year ago: 6 June 2018 Bjarne: A "DFA is soon a indisputable fact" lie by linking to one of his PDFs on the internet.

What he has is a November 10, 2017 "Extension to the Cause of the Allais Effect Solved" paper in the dubious 'Frontiers of Astronomy, Astrophysics and Cosmology' journal. No reputable journal would accept a paper that does not give proper credit to the people who collected the data or even give the data! The uncited "DTU (Denmark)" did some gravimeter readings near the Scoresbysund airport from 7 August 21.50 UTC to 8 August at 09.08.

The lie is that he predicted "about 50 µGal" in his previous article when it was 35 μGal (±10 μGal). His prediction has a maximum force and so acceleration at the time of he eclipse. No measurements were done at the time of the eclipse! The measured peak is hours after the eclipse. Thus 7 June 2018 Bjarne: A "35 μGal (±10 μGal) significant anomaly at the time measurement was done" double lie.

DTU = Technical University of Denmark.

[halleyscomet]

While we’re waiting for Bjarne’s next installment, here’s an article about the aether, the inspiration and model for Bjarne’s mythical “Dark Flow.”


The Eternal Quest for Aether, the Cosmic Stuff That Never Was

Quote:

Aristotle called it the fifth element. Alchemists thought it was the key to the philosopher’s stone. Scientists believed it was the stuff light moved through. But it never existed at all.

One of the parts I find the most interesting is that the death of the aether theory lead to the theory of the universal speed of light. This in turn is what lead to Relativity. The death of the theory Bjarne’s character is championing in rebranded form lead to the theory he claims to be attacking.

[MRC_Hans]

AH, Bjarne seems to have taken a holiday from this forum, as he usually does when the going gets rough.

Hans

[halleyscomet]

Originally Posted by MRC_Hans

AH, Bjarne seems to have taken a holiday from this forum, as he usually does when the going gets rough.

Hans

That or “Solon” is a sock puppet account of his and he’s just switching up the nonsense being peddled for humor value.

[MRC_Hans]

Originally Posted by halleyscomet

That or “Solon” is a sock puppet account of his and he’s just switching up the nonsense being peddled for humor value.

No dice. Solon writes fine English, and has a totally different agenda.

Hans