Merged Musk buys Twitter!/ Elon Musk puts Twitter deal on hold....

Status
Not open for further replies.
Could be a disaster, reinforcing/increasing the world of post-fact-reality. I hope not.

I'm less concerned about Rump's repeal of his Twitter ban. The news media is really where most of his publicity comes from and he gets that out anyway. For example his latest is calling Prince Harry under the thumb of Markle in the Piers Morgan interview. Rump does that specifically to get a news media response and sure enough, it did.

Rump claims he won't go back to Twitter if Musk allows it. I predict that stand won't last long.

But again, I think the worst is yet to come if Musk keeps to his assertion to make Twitter more free speech friendly. I take that to mean all false claims and CTs are welcome.
Just wondering how the second post in this thread aged.

Missing quite a bit of self-inflicted dumpster fire, which, to be fair wasn't immediately predictable.
 

Hmmm... seems a lot of people are having trouble even leaving replies on Twitter if using their PCs. They can do it if they are on their phones though.

Twitter is turning into ISF! :p

That's just a joke. Twitter is in many ways the opposite of ISF, given that Twitter now serves conspiracy theorist loons and degrades mainstream publications by either trying to slap "state-affiliated" labels on BBC and NPR or removing validation for NYT etc... :rolleyes:
 
I know, but the problem is they decided to make it a huge PR stunt, and those who live by PR die by PR.
Really? Most of the people I know who aren't rocket geeks like I am had no idea that it was even happening.

Hence, I agree - as a PR stunt, it was an abject failure.
 
Last edited:
As has been pointed out repeatedly in this and other threads, many free speech advocates are most concerned about having unfettered access to allow their views to be promulgated and are actively against opposing views seeing the light of day.
 
Twitter finally removed blue-checks from non-subscribed accounts the other day. Though a few accounts of extremely high-profile and popular users retained theirs - Stephen King and LeBron James were the two most widely known, although there were others - despite insisting they never subscribed. Musk eventually claimed that he was personally paying for those subscriptions, which is funny and somewhat pathetic.
 
Twitter finally removed blue-checks from non-subscribed accounts the other day. Though a few accounts of extremely high-profile and popular users retained theirs - Stephen King and LeBron James were the two most widely known, although there were others - despite insisting they never subscribed. Musk eventually claimed that he was personally paying for those subscriptions, which is funny and somewhat pathetic.

I .... um, no. I can't even come up with something to say about this. Sure Musk, you do you :thumbsup:
 
Insane money clown still insane? Check. Still clowning? Check. Still moneyed? Not so much as he used to be. Reassess after his next stupidity to hit the news or one week, whichever is shorter (it's not going to be the week).
 
Twitter finally removed blue-checks from non-subscribed accounts the other day. Though a few accounts of extremely high-profile and popular users retained theirs - Stephen King and LeBron James were the two most widely known, although there were others - despite insisting they never subscribed. Musk eventually claimed that he was personally paying for those subscriptions, which is funny and somewhat pathetic.

The people who paid for the blue check are now trying to go all "Star-Bellied Sneetches" on those who didn't pay. Its not going like they had hoped.
 
Details are not entirely clear so this might not be 100% accurate:

Twitter has apparently reinstated the verified status of every formerly verified account that had 1 million or more followers. The tooltip on their verified badge now states "This account is verified because they are subscribed to Twitter Blue and verified their phone number" even though that is clearly not true. It becomes particularly problematic when the message appears on the accounts of now deceased individuals, such as Norm MacDonald.
 
Details are not entirely clear so this might not be 100% accurate:

Twitter has apparently reinstated the verified status of every formerly verified account that had 1 million or more followers. The tooltip on their verified badge now states "This account is verified because they are subscribed to Twitter Blue and verified their phone number" even though that is clearly not true. It becomes particularly problematic when the message appears on the accounts of now deceased individuals, such as Norm MacDonald.

I forgot to mention that one notable exemption to this has been former Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey
 
Yeah. How this is supposed to work, I don’t know. Ha ha! I gave you something for free what my fans are buying for 8 dollars a month. If it is so ****** why would anyone else want one?
 

Attachments

  • 447F0530-1DD8-41E8-A331-216131D4FD9E.jpg
    447F0530-1DD8-41E8-A331-216131D4FD9E.jpg
    56 KB · Views: 15
Apparently, there's a bug where, if you change your display name, the blue check reappears, and if you change your name again, it disappears.

So @dril, the funniest ****** on Twitter, was making his unpaid-for-checkmark disappear and Elon was putting it back.

A battle for the ages.

Is there any other CEO this petty?
 
Elon is giving away his product for free to those who don't want it, as a form of trolling.

I'm no marketing wizard, but if giving your product to someone is a reliable way of disappointing them, then your product might be really bad.

It's not really trolling. Musk is essentially forced to give the blue checks back to EVERYONE who was already verified that had over a million followers.

The reason is money. Those accounts are what give Twitter its value as an advertising platform - the fact that you can put an ad under a 3.5m-follower account's tweets and those ads would be seen by potentially millions of people. The problem is that under Musk's algorithm remodel non-subscribed accounts, even ones with millions of followers, are now actively suppressed. The algorithm now favors and prioritizes the visibility of subscribed accounts, who might have only a few thousand, or hundred, or dozen followers each - a reach that isn't nearly as attractive. I suspect so few million-plus-follower-accounts actually caved and bought subscriptions that the new Blue system not only failed to generate revenue but actually threatened to cost the company even more money.
 
It's not really trolling. Musk is essentially forced to give the blue checks back to EVERYONE who was already verified that had over a million followers.

The reason is money. Those accounts are what give Twitter its value as an advertising platform - the fact that you can put an ad under a 3.5m-follower account's tweets and those ads would be seen by potentially millions of people. The problem is that under Musk's algorithm remodel non-subscribed accounts, even ones with millions of followers, are now actively suppressed. The algorithm now favors and prioritizes the visibility of subscribed accounts, who might have only a few thousand, or hundred, or dozen followers each - a reach that isn't nearly as attractive. I suspect so few million-plus-follower-accounts actually caved and bought subscriptions that the new Blue system not only failed to generate revenue but actually threatened to cost the company even more money.

What was wrong with the way it worked previously?

Is what I would ask Elon if he were here.

You're not seeing things through his ego filter.
Yup and he forgot the first rule of social media.

If you are not paying for it, you're the product.

By removing the importance of the verified accounts he's undermined the value of the premium products on his SM platform and made a lot leave as well.
 
Toxic capitalism! Should not be allowed to add debt to a company to buy that company.

Having worked at a company that had that happen to it, and where the 2008 crash meant that the owners refinanced their bonds at 20 cents in the dollar, I always think of it as me going to a bank and asking for a mortgage for a buy to let property and then asking the bank to agree to me saying that the property owes the debt not me.
 
I worry about what's going on with Twitter's Community Notes.

Sounds like a battlefield, and I fear disinformation is winning, the way Musk keeps lauding it.
 
So, got a weird one here. Let's start with a little background to help others understand:

Twitter supports the ability of a single user to use multiple accounts. This is common for someone who sometimes tweets in their personal capacity, and other times representing their brand (such as a podcast or Youtube channel). Rather than forcing a user to log out and back in back and forth, you can link the accounts together, and then will allow you to easily switch between them. When you have one of these alternate accounts, Twitter puts a little icon in the corner showing the other accounts profile picture, which you can tap to switch. This will be important in a minute.

Which brings us to today's story:

Elon posted a screen grab from his Twitter app showing that using the site's premium subscription service, he is earning $120,000 a month. As insane as that sounds all on its own, that is not why I'm writing this post. In the corner of that screen grab, the profile picture of an alternate account was shown. The existence of this alt account was, to this point, unknown. So people did some digging and they found the account.

Ladies and gentlemen, believe me when I tell you that this is way weirder than you would have thought.

Elon Musk has been roleplaying as his own 2-year-old son. These tweets have included child-Musk fantasizing about going to night clubs, asking others if they like Japanese girls, complaining about a low follower count, and even responding to Elon Musk's own posts.

More reading
A little more
 
What was wrong with the way it worked previously?

Is what I would ask Elon if he were here.

If you are talking about the blue tick marks, he was trying to create a subscription service to diversify his revenue streams but the old blue tick mark was about the only premium feature that had any value.

Unfortunately, in opening it up to everyone, he destroyed the thing that made it valuable.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom