Killtown: What's your best "Inside job" evidence?

Gravy

Downsitting Citizen
Gravy
Joined
Mar 27, 2006
Messages
17,078
Now that you've rested your case about the Val McClatchey photo, which you had described as the "smokingest smoking gun," what's your next strongest piece of evidence? When someone asks why you believe in the "inside job" theory, what fact do you really like to hit them with?

For instance, a page on your blog is devoted to the issues that convinced you that something was very fishy with the official story (excerpts):

Surely our Air Force with jetfighters that fly 3x faster than the hijacked planes and are always on alert and patrolling our skies could have at least intercepted one of these four hijacked planes.

Weeks later, my skepticism grew. On the radio, I heard that the area where the plane hit the Pentagon just happened to hit a section that was nearly empty due to renovation and to top it off, it was being renovated to "bolster it against an attack." As my eyes rolled after I heard this whopper of a coincidence, I remember saying to myself, "Oh geez, they [the military] probably allowed it to crash there."

Then, a couple months later, it all came together for me. One day while killing time on an internet message board (you know, I was bored at work) I came across a post with a link on it that changed my thoughts about 9/11 forever. When I clicked on it out of curiosity, it showed something that never dawned on me to check out before; pictures of the Pentagon crash scene. Literally within seconds of looking at the photos, I instantly knew that the plane we were told that crashed into the Pentagon didn’t.
Click to expand...
(I highlighted some errors.)

So today, what's your strongest evidence?
 
Last edited:
Gravy said:
(I highlighted some errors.)
Click to expand...


I ran across the "always patrolling our skies" claim recently somewhere, and was a little stunned by the bukkake of stupid. This particular site was claiming that the ADIZ is the area that is continually patrolled by roaming air force CAPS - in ADDITION to the NORAD Alert Bases!

:jaw-dropp

These people remind me of Daleks stuck in an M.C. Escher picture.

-Andrew
 
gumboot said:
the bukkake of stupid.
Click to expand...

I snorted. And I'm in an airport.

Damn you.


I believe that killtown will say his most damning evidence is the undisputed fact that the copilot of flight 77 was gay, and gosh darnit there's just no way Burlingame would ever fly with someone who's openly gay.

:boggled:

ETA: from http://killtown.911review.org/flight77/passengers.html(killtown's site):

Doesn't it seem odd that a person like Capt. Burlingame would be flying with a openly gay co-pilot?
Click to expand...

This is his "evidence"??? :wide-eyed
 
Last edited:
So Killtown can't see how Capt. Burlingame would associate with "one of those people". Nor, appearantly can he accept that a gay man can rise up to become a hero (Mark Bingham). And he openly mocks him and his family at every opportunity.

It seems that jews and gays occupy prominent positions on his hate list.
 
Sword_Of_Truth said:
So Killtown can't see how Capt. Burlingame would associate with "one of those people". Nor, appearantly can he accept that a gay man can rise up to become a hero (Mark Bingham). And he openly mocks him and his family at every opportunity.

It seems that jews and gays occupy prominent positions on his hate list.
Click to expand...

The more I read these debates the more I feel there is just something fishy about this whole 'truth movement'....
 
I was going to answer soon because I thought my Flight 93 plume theory was all but destroyed, but your fellow OCTs hit a MAJOR road block in proving their plume size estimations, so it looks like it might be a while longer now.

;)
 
glad to see your willing to admit some of your evidence might be wrong and about to be destroyed. Whether this occurs, or not, your admission to possibly being wrong is a step (baby step) in the right direction.
 
Killtown said:
I was going to answer soon because I thought my Flight 93 plume theory was all but destroyed, but your fellow OCTs hit a MAJOR road block in proving their plume size estimations, so it looks like it might be a while longer now.

;)
Click to expand...
As always, rather than posting to say why you can't answer right now, you simply could have answered. How many times do I have to point that out to you?

You're the roadblock, and you have been for days. And now you've made the snide comment that your "calculator is broken."

I posted on that thread suggesting that everyone take a break. Please do, Killtown, and discuss another issue.
 
Killtown said:
I was going to answer soon because I thought my Flight 93 plume theory was all but destroyed, but your fellow OCTs hit a MAJOR road block in proving their plume size estimations, so it looks like it might be a while longer now.

;)
Click to expand...

Actually, Killtown, try reading the thread again.

We've got statements from actual experts in the field who say the size is within the range to be expected for such an impact, but the exact size cannot be determined from a single photo.

You claim it's too large, based on nothing but your own "best guess".

So far, our evidence trumps your lack of evidence. Unless you can show some reason why the estimate of this expert is incorrect, you've got nothing.
 
TK0001 said:
I snorted. And I'm in an airport.

Damn you.


I believe that killtown will say his most damning evidence is the undisputed fact that the copilot of flight 77 was gay, and gosh darnit there's just no way Burlingame would ever fly with someone who's openly gay.

:boggled:

ETA: from http://killtown.911review.org/flight77/passengers.html(killtown's site):



This is his "evidence"??? :wide-eyed
Click to expand...

I thought you were joking.

Jesus christ.

Killtown trumps himself by sinking to a further low, absolutely incredible.
 
Mancman said:
I thought you were joking.

Jesus christ.

Killtown trumps himself by sinking to a further low, absolutely incredible.
Click to expand...

Yah. Slime of the worst sort. You notice how Killtown claims a father sent his son to die? Bernard Brown, passenger 10 in the list.
 
Killtown @ his site said:
What do all these teachers and students have in common who were embarking on the National Geographic funded educational trip?
Click to expand...

Down at the bottom of his absurd Flight 77 page.

Please, Killtown, explain what you mean. And don't use your famous "magic quotes." Plain English only. I have a feeling what it might be, but I don't want to put words in your mouth.
 
calebprime said:
can someone tell me what "bump" and "loose change" mean on this board?

specific to this board or general to all chatrooms?
Click to expand...

Loose Change is the title of the most notorious 9-11 conspiracy crockumentaries. MarkyX made a video on the makers of LC wherein they slander a father of one of the 9-11 victims by accusing him of sending his son to die while he played golf.

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-7216643725166640147&q=9-11+deniers&hl=en

"Bump" is a common practice on message boards to send a thread back to the top of the page without actually saying anything in it.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom