Who Disrespects NYPD & NYFD

Russell Pickering said:
Repetition is not truth.

Only the weakest of minds will let your continous hypnotic drone past their conscious mind.

I pay VERY close attention to the evidence that I do present and what topics you avoid.
Click to expand...

That doesn't look like providing evidence to me...
 
Russell Pickering said:
UK,

So why are you not out investigating what it was they were covering instead of attacking people who are looking into it. You are after the truth aren't you?

Russell
Click to expand...
The truth is that those buildings were destroyed by the impact of planes and the resulting fires

Do I believe the govt could have stopped it? No I don't. I do believe they could have been more aware of the potential, but I seriously doubt they could have saved any lives.

And trust me on this.... I despise Bush and all that he stands for. To me Clinton was probably one of the best presidents your country ever had. But I doubt that he could have stopped it either, unless some more rigorous form of airport security had been implemented. And then if that had happened he would have been crucified for imposing on the freedom of americans to travel.
 
jessicarabbit said:
We don't want to convert you hun, we only wan't a certain calibre of people on our side.
Click to expand...

What are you on about?
Convert me to what?
I'm not your "hun".
And the only "side" I'm on is the side of truth, facts, and evidence.
 
Last edited:
Russell Pickering said:
Repetition is not truth.

Only the weakest of minds will let your continous hypnotic drone past their conscious mind.

I pay VERY close attention to the evidence that I do present and what topics you avoid.
Click to expand...
A Christopheralike statement if ever I heard one.

Very well. Present your evidence that most of my writings are unfounded or invalid, or withdraw the claim.

Fair enough, Russell? If I said that about you, you'd surely want some proof.

I await your answer.
 
jessicarabbit said:
Above is an admission that gravy hasn't read the report.
Click to expand...

Docker, your 707 design impact of 5,493,904,362 is wrong.

It should be 380,800,000 Joules, you are off by more than 10.

Why? This makes the impacts of 9/11 ten times greater than design impact of 707.

Makes the tower standing after impact almost a miracle.

WOW,

why are your calcualtions off by so much do you need help?
 
uk_dave said:
Jessica,

Try not to be so parochial. I know it's a common problem with those on the CT side of things but honestly, the US is not the whole world.

Just as climate change is a global issue and is studied by scientists from around the world, so is the collapse of the WTC towers.

Engineers NEED to know why those buggers cames down because their professional integrity (not to mention their PI insurance) depends on knowing.

Even if every scientist in america was corrupt and in the pocket of the admin, you would be hearing a chorus of opinion from the international community objecting to the official version of 9/11 just as there is a global scientific consensus regarding AGW
Click to expand...



Last Updated: Wednesday, 26 July 2006, 15:50 GMT 16:50 UK
Tower block fire aids 9/11 debate

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/scotland/glasgow_and_west/5216788.stm
 
Wow guys, something totally ****ed just happened, the BBC deleted that page as soon as i viewed it.

I googled 911 fire experiments to see if there was anything dissenting from the international community, and I found that article, read it, copied the info from the top of the page, and pasted.

After I posted, I clicked the link and it went 404, I went back to the page, clicked refresh, got a 404, pressed back, clicked the link i had just clicked, got a 404.

If that's not a conspiracy I dunno what is. ;)

Here's the google cache instead.

http://72.14.205.104/search?q=cache...+fire+experiment+911&hl=en&gl=ca&ct=clnk&cd=2
 
jessicarabbit said:
I read your paper now have the courtesy to read the report. Then tell me in light of it how the NIST report is in any way reliable.
Click to expand...

Have you read the report, all 10,000 pages

docker did? or did you

what about your 707 calculation being over 10 times off?
 
Dazed said:
Last Updated: Wednesday, 26 July 2006, 15:50 GMT 16:50 UK
Tower block fire aids 9/11 debate

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/scotland/glasgow_and_west/5216788.stm
Click to expand...

Interesting.

I certainly don't remeber a horizon programme on this.

So this guy sets light to a ....what I would guess is a reinforced concrete frame struture, but let's assume it was steel frame, sets light to it to cast light upon 9/11.

hmmmmmmmmm it doesn't say when he was planning to fly planes into it or cause an equivalent amount of structural damage and damage to the fireproofing.

Ahhhh but this was in july. It's what we call 'silly season'
 
Torero is certainly part of the BRE

But strangely, I cant find any info on the outcome of this experiment.
 
Gravy said:
We try not to dump links here without comment, Dazed. When CTs do that I never read them unless something specific is pointed out and its relevance noted. Can you provide an example of a significant error in the Commission report from that link? We're talking about things that affect the validity of the report's conclusions, of course.
Click to expand...


Dazed the translation is..... Gravy never reads anything that proves him wrong. But did you read he's groovy gravy grave paper?? Since you were link dumping, allow me to help you.

Omissions and Errors in the Commission's Final Report
Rep. McKinney 9/11 Congressional Briefing
August 2005

by John Newman
[John Newman spent 21 years in Army Intelligence and served as Assistant to the Director of the National Security Agency. He also served as an attaché in China. He is a history professor at UMD, and has been teaching courses o-n counterterrorism for 10 years. Newman has written and published widely and is working o-n a manuscript about the events leading up to 9/11.]
It’s a pleasure to be here, an honor to be here today, and to make my small contribution. It falls to me this morning to bring to your attention the story of Saeed Sheikh, whose full name is Ahmed Omar Saeed Sheikh, and his astonishing rise to power in Al Qaeda, his crucial role in 9/11, which is completely, utterly, missing from the 9/11 Commission report…and also to deal with what US Intelligence knew about his links to the ISI, (Pakistani Intelligence), and what, if anything, was said or not said in the Commission report about these things.
Click to expand...

The JREF has adopted a policy of considering all published material copyrighted, including articles, images and other media, it is not the responsibility of the JREF to determine whether or not the work is in the public domain or if the work may be republished without explicit permission of the copyright holder. Copyrighted content may be posted within the doctrine of "fair use" therefore quoting of brief portions of articles, books, emails, or bulletin board messages, relevant to discussion, is permitted. All quoted material should be credited to the original author or publisher and a link provided (when available) to the original work. It is not possible to declare precisely how much material may be quoted, as it will vary from article to article. We suggest quoting no more than a paragraph. Authors of copyrighted material may post their own work, provided they hold publishing rights to the material.
Replying to this modbox in thread will be off topic  Posted By: Lisa Simpson
 
Last edited by a moderator:
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom