The conspirators thread, what happened ?

stateofgrace

Unregistered
S
Joined
Aug 31, 2006
Messages
3,843
I have yet to recieve a reply from a single conspirator to this post.

So now you have all this evidence could you guys tell us what you think happened on 911?

In a few short sentences. I will give you an example.

19 guys funded through Al Quada hijacked four planes. Three of them hit buildings. Two burnt and fell down. One hit the Pentagon. The forth crashed after the passengers staged a fight back. NIST have produced a report into the collapse of the towers that is accepted by the vast majority of the scientific community. At the moment they are investigating why WTC 7 collapsed.

OK over to you.

I'll start you off.

"Some time before 911............... (please enter sentences)...........................so 911 is an inside job"

(Ps, no nitpicking of my sentences just enter your own)

Free my mind and tell me what happened, no excuses, no fall back on “we’re just asking question”. No more “that’s for the USG to tell us”.

YOU are the accusers of US citizens of being involved in mass murder of their fellow countrymen, time to put up. Tell us what happened.
Click to expand...

Now to all the conspirators tell me what you believed happened on 911, please.

Nothing complex just a few sentences long, thanks in advance.
 
Whatever the answer is, its bound to include the terms freefall; nwo, pnac or some other variation; footprint, molten/melted, and vaporized just to name a few.
 
Man, all those smart CTers who have been researching this for years, I thought they'd at least have a rough outline of what REALLY happened by now... :rolleyes:

I can't believe this thread isn't filled w/ page after page of plausible conspiracy scenarios by now!
 
It will involve a lot of "it looked like", "coincidence?" and "Alex Jones said" ...
 
Russell?

Usual Suspects?

Jessica?

TS ?

Any conspirator? Care to offer up an opinion on what exactly happened on this day?
 
After watching the CTers pointedly avoid responding to your post in the other thread, I am not the least bit surprised that they are pointedly avoiding responding to this thread.

It seems to be a major bugaboo for CTers, being asked to simply offer even a hypothetical theory of the events from the CT perspective.

I know that they always say that it isn't up to them to provide a theory, but they must struggle internally with the logical inconsistency of that position.

In fact, if they came up and presented a remotely plausible theory, it would assist them greatly in winning over new converts to their dying movement. Yet, inexplicably, they still refuse to even attempt it.

Strange, isn't it?
 
I'll give it a go:

The planes, remote controlled from a satellit weapon systen free falled into the towers where they set of pre planted explosives in the concrete core which lead to the emission of radiation causing cars to do funny things and when they collapsed they triggered timing devices in wtc7 where a grilled cheese sandwich was waiting to cook while at the pentagon a missile was fired from a cessna causing flight 93 to pass over pennsylvania.
 
uk_dave said:
I'll give it a go:

The planes, remote controlled from a satellit weapon systen free falled into the towers where they set of pre planted explosives in the concrete core which lead to the emission of radiation causing cars to do funny things and when they collapsed they triggered timing devices in wtc7 where a grilled cheese sandwich was waiting to cook while at the pentagon a missile was fired from a cessna causing flight 93 to pass over pennsylvania.
Click to expand...

There were no planes! HA! Debunked!
 
'planes' has many meanings (dammit)......

a plane can be a joiners tool....or maybe a .....a... plane of existence.... or.... a piece of glass decribed by someone with a speech impediment.... my CT still stands and I'll ignore anyone who says otherwise.

Is that plane enough? (oh bugger) :duck: STOP doing that!
 
stateofgrace said:
Russell?

Usual Suspects?

Jessica?

TS ?

Any conspirator? Care to offer up an opinion on what exactly happened on this day?
Click to expand...

I will offer a possibility.

Some time before 911 the administration realised its oil campaign would need a bit of public support. Utilising their control of Al quaida and suppressing genuine attempts to apprehend them, they facilitated a watershed attack. Since then they have used 911 as an excuse for everything and describe it as an opportunity (see my sig).
 
jessicarabbit said:
I will offer a possibility.

Some time before 911 the administration realised its oil campaign would need a bit of public support. Utilising their control of Al quaida and suppressing genuine attempts to apprehend them, they facilitated a watershed attack. Since then they have used 911 as an excuse for everything and describe it as an opportunity (see my sig).
Click to expand...

Maybe give it some context, eh?

None of us would ever wish the evil that was done on September the 11th. Yet after America was attacked, it was as if our entire country looked into a mirror and saw our better selves. We were reminded that we are citizens, with obligations to each other, to our country, and to history. We began to think less of the goods we can accumulate, and more about the good we can do.

For too long our culture has said, "If it feels good, do it." Now America is embracing a new ethic and a new creed: "Let's roll." (Applause.) In the sacrifice of soldiers, the fierce brotherhood of firefighters, and the bravery and generosity of ordinary citizens, we have glimpsed what a new culture of responsibility could look like. We want to be a nation that serves goals larger than self. We've been offered a unique opportunity, and we must not let this moment pass. (Applause.)
Click to expand...

source
 
Bell said:
Maybe give it some context, eh?



source
Click to expand...

On september the 14th 2001 at a CFR bash, Gary hart said this

Americans are brilliant at many things not least of which is turning lemons into lemonade. There is a chance for the president of the United States to use this disaster to carry out what his father, a phrase his father used I think only once and hasn’t been used since and that is a New World Order. Think about this
Click to expand...
 
Wow Jessica you offered a possibility.

Now you have missed the point. So let me restate what you need to do.

Please,just a brief description, nothing complex but what you think happened on 09/11/2001. I will list the following, as I have included in my short summary for you to include in your summary.

1. The Towers
2. Flight 77 (the Pentagon)
3. Flight 93
4.The hijackers
5. Al Quada
6. The investigation.
7. WTC 7

Just in a few sentences summarise your theory for me, cheers.
 
Last edited:
jessicarabbit said:
On september the 14th 2001 at a CFR bash, Gary hart said this
Click to expand...

But what about George W. Bush' his comment put in context? Nice sidestepping, wabbit.

But what the hell. Here's the speech by Bush sr.

And here the quote in context. Note he speaks about A new world order. Not THE New World order.

Clearly, no longer can a dictator count on East-West confrontation to stymie concerted United Nations action against aggression.

A new partnership of nations has begun, and we stand today at a unique and extraordinary moment. The crisis in the Persian Gulf, as grave as it is, also offers a rare opportunity to move toward an historic period of cooperation. Out of these troubled times, our fifth objective -- a new world order -- can emerge: A new era -- freer from the threat of terror, stronger in the pursuit of justice and more secure in the quest for peace. An era in which the nations of the world, east and west, north and south, can prosper and live in harmony.

A hundred generations have searched for this elusive path to peace, while a thousand wars raged across the span of human endeavor, and today that new world is struggling to be born. A world quite different from the one we've known. A world where the rule of law supplants the rule of the jungle. A world in which nations recognize the shared responsibility for freedom and justice. A world where the strong respect the rights of the weak.

This is the vision that I shared with President Gorbachev in Helsinki. He and the other leaders from Europe, the gulf and around the world understand that how we manage this crisis today could shape the future for generations to come. 'The Test We Face Is Great'
Click to expand...
 
Four planes were hijacked by Al Quada on 9/11. The towers and 7 were demolished to add effect to the attack (probably connected to Zelikows article in 1998) The investigation was delayed and usurped.
 
jessicarabbit said:
Four planes were hijacked by Al Quada on 9/11. The towers and 7 were demolished to add effect to the attack (probably connected to Zelikows article in 1998) The investigation was delayed and usurped.
Click to expand...

I'm sorry I didn't see any reference to Flight 77 or Flight 93.

Please try again.

"Some time before 911............... (please enter sentences)...........................so 911 is an inside job"
Click to expand...
 
Last edited:
jessicarabbit said:
Flight 77 hit the pentagon. 93 crashed in shanksville. The investigation is untristworthy as I pointed out with this report

http://www.ucsusa.org/scientific_in...ts-scientific-integrity-in-policy-making.html
Click to expand...
jessicarabbit, the link you are referring to is not proof that the 9-11 Commission nor the NIST Report are faulty.

I know more about this subject than you might think. One of the key concerns your reference is talking about is the muzzling of David Hansen, chief scientist of my organization, who found his comments on climate change edited by a hack without his approval. It is a concern. However, one can only get away with it where data is open for interpretation.

There are no such grey areas with respect to Sept. 11th. Not the science part. The mechanics of how and when planes crashed and buildings fell has not been seriously challenged, not by anyone. No such whitewashing could possibly stand here without being noticed.
 
jessicarabbit said:
Flight 77 hit the pentagon. 93 crashed in shanksville. The investigation is untristworthy as I pointed out with this report

http://www.ucsusa.org/scientific_in...ts-scientific-integrity-in-policy-making.html
Click to expand...

So your summary is.

Four planes were hijacked by 19 guys funded by Al Quada. Two flew into the Towers which had explosives pre planted in them. Flight 77 hit the Pentagon. Flight 93 crashed after an onboard stuggle.The investigation has covered all this up. And WTC 7 was, oh sorry you missed this one out.

Please just write it all down, get it out and lets see it. Cheers.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom