[Moderated] So What Would You Think If This Were True?

DGM said:
He also fails to take into consideration that there were people on ALL sides of the building. He thinks that the fire ball would obscure their view. How about people on the other side that had the plane go over their heads?
Click to expand...

Well, in Lyte's world, there are no life forms on the other side of the Potomac. And he would know....

.... He made a trip there.
 
Corsair 115 said:
Two things come to mind:

1) Jets are LOUD, really LOUD. Folks may get used to the noise of aircraft on climbs or landing approaches because in the case of the former there are often noise abatement procedures in place, and in the latter due to the fact the jet is moving relatively slowly and at low power settings.

But a jet, flying along at low altitude at a very high rate of speed, that's going to make a noise folks are going to notice.

2) A large, fast-moving metallic object is sure to catch people's eyes. Human eyes are relatively good at detecting movement within their visual field, at least in my experience.

Put these two together and any jet overflying the Pentagon would have been witnessed by a heck of a lot of people, not the paltry few from whom you've supposedly been able to get statements.
Click to expand...
Apologies if someone has covered this already...

No. Jets do fly low over the Pentagon every couple of minutes. The Pentagon is right on the Potomac River and the River is the approach/departure path for flights arriving/leaving Reagan National. I used to live a bit north of the Pentagon where the planes are flying higher and you do get used to the noise of loud planes.

ETA: Comparable event: The 14th Street is near the Pentagon. In 1982 an Air Florida plane crashed into the bridge and river.
 
Last edited:
RecoveringYuppy said:
Apologies if someone has covered this already...

No. Jets do fly low over the Pentagon every couple of minutes. The Pentagon is right on the Potomac River and the River is the approach/departure path for flights arriving/leaving Reagan National. I used to live a bit north of the Pentagon where the planes are flying higher and you do get used to the noise of loud planes.
Click to expand...

Fly low, sure. But 50 or so feet over the Pentagon?

At top speeds?
 
But at that altitude you're not going to have much warning. Only a few people noticed the Air Florida crash before it happened (blizzard didn't help though).
 
Last edited:
RecoveringYuppy said:
But at that altitude you're not going to have much warning. Only a few people noticed the Air Florida crash before it happened (blizzard didn't help though).
Click to expand...

I think the main contention (mine at least) is that peoples' attention was already drawn to the Pentagon with the explosion/fireball/smoke.

How none of them noticed a jet-airliner screaming at top speeds hundreds of feet off the ground is something I just can't wrap my head around.

Especially on a day when people are hearing stories of jets slamming into the World Trade Center.
 
RecoveringYuppy said:
Jets do fly low over the Pentagon every couple of minutes. The Pentagon is right on the Potomac River and the River is the approach/departure path for flights arriving/leaving Reagan National.
Click to expand...
As I mentioned, approach and departure are very different from an jetliner flying at full speed at low altitude.

RecoveringYuppy said:
ETA: Comparable event: The 14th Street is near the Pentagon. In 1982 an Air Florida plane crashed into the bridge and river.
Click to expand...
If I recall correctly, that was essentially a failed take-off due to ice build-up on the wings.
 
I think they should try to make a mock re-creation. Obviously not to scale or anything. But get a small plane, have it fly over a building while setting off an explosion and then pull up and see from where people can and can't see the plane pulling up. Perhaps get some people who are not aware of the experiment to comment afterwards and see if they noticed.
 
therealflightpath.jpg

Red=Official Story/ASCE flight path
Blue=Citgo witness flight path
Yellow=Light poles



If the plane came from the North side of the gas station as described by this witness at the Citgo, what would you think?

Gravy said:
I'm almost certain that someone would have noticed all that colored string leading to the Pentagon.
Click to expand...

"Mark Roberts", "NYC tour guide", joking about the murder of people at the Pentagon.
 
Tell me Lyte, what if you discovered that everything you believe to be true about chemtrails and the NWO was actually false. Would you then trust your own judgement when it comes to the pentagon?
 
Is it just me or do both lines end up crashing into the Pentagon, making the end result meaningless even if Lyte was right?
 
Your evidence is four people who disagree with you. The counter-evidence is everything else that disagrees with you. So yes, I deny your claims.

My questions was as to the deeper meaning of your claim. If you prove that the plane crashed into the Pentagon from over here rather than from over there, what does that accomplish?
 
Given the thorough debunking all of your nonsense received in this thread, I'm quite surprised that you resurrected it Lyte. Or are you in denial?
 
Oh, look, a troofer digs up a six month old thread for no apparent reason, even though said troofer has been here the entire time....it seems that LyteTrip is a Necromancer.


thum_11103467f5c736ae31.jpg


Necromancer has a supernatural ability to bring long-dead forum discussion threads back to life. After having been flogged to death, the thread may have been deceased for many months, and bringing it back may have scant relevance to the current topic, yet Necromancer will unexpectedly exhume the thread’s rotting corpse, and strike horror in the forum as its grotesque form lurches into the discussion. The monster, instantly recognized by all who knew it in life, seems at first to breathe and have a pulse, but, alas, it is beyond Necromancer’s skill to fully restore the thread’s original vitality.

The hideous apparition may frighten away some of the weaker Warriors or Warriors badly wounded in former battles, but the thread is only a shadow of its former self and very quickly expires.
 
quixotecoyote said:
If you prove that the plane crashed into the Pentagon from over here rather than from over there, what does that accomplish?
Click to expand...

So you believe it crashed into the Pentagon, but from the North side of the Citgo?

You believe the North side and the impact, is that correct?
 
Lyte Trip said:
So you believe it crashed into the Pentagon, but from the North side of the Citgo?

You believe the North side and the impact, is that correct?
Click to expand...

For the sake of getting you to answer my damn question, yes. For that matter I hereby and unequivocably announce my belief in that and any other position you hold, have held, or may hold in the future, including but not limited to chemtrails, reptoids, free energy, Sylvia Browne, the gold standard, Egyptian helicopters, orbs, pods, space weapons, pod-based-space-orbs, the attempt to annex Canada and Mexico, Mark Roberts as a CIA gay spy, and anything involving the jews.

Now.

If you prove that the plane crashed into the Pentagon from over here rather than from over there, what does that accomplish?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom