Is Bended Space = Contracted Space ?

You say that like there's a difference, but there isn't.
Click to expand...
So you can you meassure excact density of the mass 6378 km inside the Earh=?
Is this s new religion ?

Bjarne
Try to tell me the pressure in the centre of the Earth compared to that device
Ziggurat
It's in the link I gave:
Click to expand...
No such answer /data there comrade.
 
Bjarne said:
So you can you meassure excact density of the mass 6378 km inside the Earh=?
Is this s new religion ?
Click to expand...

Nobody can ever measure anything exactly. There are always measurement uncertainties, no matter what you measure and no matter how you measure it. Didn't you know that?
 
Bjarne said:
So the inner core of the earth is observed.
Click to expand...
Yes through seismology. This is observed in that same sense that traffic controllers observe airplanes using radar.
Your ignorance of science may have lead you to think that observed means seen by the naked eye.

Bjarne said:
Maybe you were there?
I mean 6378 km inside the Earth?
Click to expand...
No.
Bjarne said:
Do you have such submarines in NZ ?
Click to expand...
No. I do hope that in Danish "submarines" has a wider meaning than in English. In English submarine = below the water.

Bjarne said:
So you know devices that we can put a pressure on matter that big as inside the Earth?

Yeeh yeh, we shall hear a lot before the ears fall of....
Do you have other jokes today, - from down under ?
Click to expand...
Yes. It's called a diamond anvil cell.
The range of static pressure attainable today extends to the estimated pressures at the Earth’s center (~360 GPa).
Click to expand...

A joke from down under:
A scientist and Bjarne walk into a pub.
The publican looks up at the scientist and says "Wow, you are tall". The scientist replies "That is because I am standing on the shoulders of giants".
The publican looks down at Bjarne and says "Wow, you are short". Bjarne replies "That is because I am sinking into the pit of my ignorance".
 
Last edited:
Nobody can ever measure anything exactly
Click to expand...
That was the point, and especially 6500 km away right ?

Yes through seismology.
Click to expand...
When I speak about observed in a scientific sense I am sure you know what I mean.

A scientist and Bjarne walk into a pub.
Click to expand...
I never work in at a pub, but rather away for unnecessary noise. You must mistake me for being another.
You know I am just a dreamer, that don’t accept all the huge load of superficial, superstition, fanatic, ill-considered, incoherent, authoritarian “scientific” overloads.

If we just cool stick to what we know, we would never would have come so far away out on Jens peters Jensen plowed fields. But science have become omniscient entertainment. That’s the only problem.
 
Bjarne said:
That was the point, and especially 6500 km away right ?


When I speak about observed in a scientific sense I am sure you know what I mean.


I never work in at a pub, but rather away for unnecessary noise. You must mistake me for being another.
You know I am just a dreamer, that don’t accept all the huge load of superficial, superstition, fanatic, ill-considered, incoherent, authoritarian “scientific” overloads.

If we just cool stick to what we know, we would never would have come so far away out on Jens peters Jensen plowed fields. But science have become omniscient entertainment. That’s the only problem.
Click to expand...

Crackpot gibberish,I love it.This is almost as funny as Nationalcosmipolitan's drivellings.
 
A joke from down under:
A scientist and Bjarne walk into a coffee shop.
The barista looks up at the scientist and says "Wow, you are tall". The scientist replies "That is because I am standing on the shoulders of giants".
The barista looks down at Bjarne and says "Wow, you are short". Bjarne replies "That is because I am sinking into the pit of my ignorance".
 
Reality Check said:
A joke from down under:
A scientist and Bjarne walk into a coffee shop.
The barista looks up at the scientist and says "Wow, you are tall". The scientist replies "That is because I am standing on the shoulders of giants".
The barista looks down at Bjarne and says "Wow, you are short". Bjarne replies "That is because I am sinking into the pit of my ignorance".
Click to expand...

If my brain and you brain was for sale at a action.
Which brain would get the highest bid?
 
Bjarne said:
You know I am just a dreamer, that don’t accept all the huge load of superficial, superstition, fanatic, ill-considered, incoherent, authoritarian “scientific” overloads.
Click to expand...


Bjarne, the scientists who have managed to bring about paradigm shifts in their fields used science to do it. They worked hard and submitted their work to the review of their peers. No, their ideas weren't welcomed with open arms but they persevered and kept presenting solid evidence. Eventually their peers saw that the new theory explained the world better than the old one.

You are like someone attending a baseball game who doesn't even know which end of the bat to hold who nonetheless walks out onto the field and starts telling the players they're playing the game all wrong. And you have the nerve to call them names while you do it. You want to change the rules but you don't even know how the game's played. And then you become indignant when the players laugh you off the field.

Maybe your ideas belong more in the realm of philosophy than science. Maybe you'd find more acceptance there.

ferd
 
Last edited:
Bjarne said:
That was the point, and especially 6500 km away right ?
Click to expand...

You really don't get it, do you? While we may not have measured the density of the core with as great a precision as we know other densities, we have still measured it.

When I speak about observed in a scientific sense I am sure you know what I mean.
Click to expand...

I have no clue what you mean because you speak nonsense.

I never work in at a pub, but rather away for unnecessary noise. You must mistake me for being another.
Click to expand...

"X walks into a pub" is a standard opening line for a joke, Bjarne. He was making fun of you for being ignorant. And you just demonstrated his point.

You know I am just a dreamer, that don’t accept all the huge load of superficial, superstition, fanatic, ill-considered, incoherent, authoritarian “scientific” overloads.
Click to expand...

You know so little about science that your evaluation of its faults are worthless.

But science have become omniscient entertainment. That’s the only problem.
Click to expand...

Scientists don't pretend to be omniscient. You just know so very little that it looks that way to you.
 
Bjarne, the scientists who have managed to bring about paradigm shifts in their fields used science to do it. They worked hard and submitted their work to the review of their peers.
Click to expand...
Like Dark Matter right?

No, their ideas weren't welcomed with open arms but they persevered and kept presenting solid evidence.
Click to expand...
So where is the evidence for that resistance only applies to acceleration?

Eventually their peers saw that the new theory explained the world better than the old one.
Click to expand...
Its many times only a question of what is possible to get people to believe .

You want to change the rules but you don't even know how the game's played.
Click to expand...
Ohh I do. I just don't share the common creeds. .
 
Bjarne said:
Like Dark Matter right?
Click to expand...

No, theories that have had enough time to be understood and accepted, like plate tectonics and the prion theory of disease


So where is the evidence for that resistance only applies to acceleration?
Click to expand...

Non sequitur; that's already been explained to you by others


Its many times only a question of what is possible to get people to believe .
Click to expand...

I'm not sure what you're referring to here, but science doesn't care what anyone believes.


Ohh I do. I just don't share the common creeds. .
Click to expand...

Exactly. You reject science and want to substitute your own definitions for the established ones. I think you should be free to call a cow an aardvark if you so choose, but don't expect a zoologist to accept it.

ferd
 
Exactly. You reject science and want to substitute your own definitions for the established ones
Click to expand...
Wrong
I reject what is only belives and want science back.
 
Bjarne said:
I reject "science" based on fanatic believes and want science (based on objectivity) back
Click to expand...

Then you should start by being objective. You are not. You hold mutually contradictory beliefs. There is nothing objective about that.
 
Bjarne said:
If my brain and you brain was for sale at a action.
Which brain would get the highest bid?
Click to expand...

Interesting comparison. http://www.middelfart-museum.dk/daare/sektion3/diagnoser4.html

Hjernesamlingen på Psykiatrisk Hospital i Århus er den eneste af sin slags i Nordeuropa.
Samlingen har bl.a. været anvendt til forskning i skizofreni og Alzheimers sygdom. Med udviklingen af ny scanningsteknologi er samlingen igen blevet aktuel. Samlingen gør det muligt at studere hjernevævet på celleniveau, og den forskning kan hjælpe til udviklingen af ny medicin, bl.a. mod depressioner.
Click to expand...
The brains that get stored for later examination are the "unusual" ones.
So a normal functional one would most likely get no bids.

ETA: This one made me wonder.
It depends - what are the criteria for the price of a brain?
Click to expand...
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom