Exactly how long will you take to measure 15 floors, and exactly how much will the tide change in that time? Unless you calculate it, you cannot dismiss it as insignificant.
I will count the time too. Don’t worry
How long between step 1 and step 2? How much will gravity change due to tide during that interval? This is absolutely crucial since you expect to find a step interval between suite 1 and 2 of measurements. If you find a step, how will you show that it is not due to tide?
No.
You can see step 1 and 2 as independent.
But I don’t think we need.
This two steps should both show the same, but just opposite to each other.
Frankly, I don't believe you had thought about it.
Both the buildings height and the height of each floor will be measured
We are talking about an effect that is more than 30 times stronger than the gravity field of your building.
What effect ?
So the difference between each floor is larger than the gravity of the entire building!
No way ..
You cant just "sort out the deviation".
Of course you can.
You must know the exact height of each floor (no, you can't just assume they are the same height).
It can be measured, and why should a residential property not have same height at each floor?
Lister near the center of the building, e.g; floor 17 you expect the buildings gravity (in the height to be almost zero). I expect it to be the same as at floor 30, or floor 0 (-) .
So, explain how a syncro-cyclotron is built, and how it compensates for an unknown deceleration.
+ kW - or rather + w.
Could you translate that into some language?
If you believe that CERN or any other similar accelerator ever have been used to register or disprove that resistances against acceleration doesn’t applies by constants velocity, lets bet. – But you will have to prove it.
Why don't you do it yourself? Don't you want the credit for yourself?
Because:
1.) I have the past year learned that most people carry 22 centimetre dick crackpot glasses.
2.) And even those that can see this could be correct are afraid for the majority. – Everybody are afraid from there “reputation” – Let’s say the editor by nature really understand this theory, and 95% believes it’s correct. - 5% doubt is enough to he do not publish, because what would happen with the famous brand “NATURE” when he was wrong. And what about he job when it was wrong etc…
3.)NASA is anyway not the fastest way to prove the theory. NASA will wake very suddenly don’t worry. And so will the dark meter sect, the CERN people etc…Buy who know how many already can see the logic and “use” these thoughts. But everybody knows we are up against fanaticism, everybody must be very carefully what they say and think. It’s always like this. Think about Stephen Hawking when he claimed everything comes from nothing etc etc etc....
Yeah, fumbling around with an instrument you don't know how to use, without having calculated your error sources in advance. I'm sure you will get fabulous results.
Do you speak of the triangulating device?
Don’t underestimate it, it’s a great step forwards.
First of all you don't know a thing about those satellites.
Do you ?
No right ?
Or ?
So how many percent are orbitting about 35000 meters altitude?
And how many percent lower than that ?
Secondly, some of the early ones took real pictures on film (back during the cold war, CCD chips were crap) and dropped a capsule with it.
And how did they
know EXCACTLY where these was back in the 70 and 80´ties , - do you think?
they needed to know exactly where they were (we are not talking about 10 meters, after all; if a satellite has a constant speed loss, it will run into big differences in no time).
And ?
Do you think there were serveral attemps ?
Anyway , - I am not talking about a satellites is losing 15 meter per day comrade.
If we talk about the communication satellite and all kind of satellites in 20 – to 40.000 km altitude, these are
not or
VERY weakly affected because the forces in that altitude equalize each other.
I guess we here talk about the main parts of the satellites are not affected or VERY weakly.
http://www.science27.com/english/Sattelites.htm
So the space wind doesn’t affect these comrade or so weak that it can not be determinate anyway with now day’s methods.
Satellites in
much lower orbit, e.g; those in 1000 km e.g: measuring the Earth magnetic field, are affected by space wind.
How old is the GPS – 10 years? - Keep that in mind comrade OK?.
The new triangular devise is
the first device ever that makes it possible for a space probes to know exactly where it is and will first be tested live in 2011. It has until now been a BIG problem to know where space probes are...
Don’t be surprises when you suddenly one day wake up to the news some satellites is more of course than expected. Remember my words: - this will happen, and it will happen because we first now begin to be ready to track fast flying objects exactly.
One more point, - satellites are affected by many conditions, - the Sun and the Moon, GR and SR as well as the atmosphere. Many are also regularly forced back to the wanted orbit.
How sure can you be that all these factors is perfectly understood ?
And the last point, only relative few satellites are used to scientifically purposes. If commercial satellites are off course these are probably just forced back, - without to asking, - because what counts is to serve people, to earn money, not always to serve scientist..
I can guarantee you that surprises according to (low altitude) orbiting satellites will come, and it could be soon. Simply because
first now a days we are much more prepared to discover exactly if, when, and what is wrong, (as long as a satellites is all right equipped), if not then forget it, you will not know anything. (Advise: be more carefully to bet you ass away comrade).
!
