First of all, what I'm proposing is not some "off in the distance magnetic field" pushing things apart. I'm talking about material objects being embedded *IN* an expanding/moving particle/EM field that is full of charged moving particles, that equate to "current flow" at near light speed.
I know what your theory is supposed to be, and my post is 100% relevant to it. I also know that your theory changes from moment to moment, so I wanted to go through the possible force laws one by one and exclude
all possible EM-did-it variants, since I don't know which one you will pull out next time.
You realize, of course, that "particle/EM fields" are just collections of point masses/charges that obey Maxwell's Equations and Newton's Laws. I told you what those laws do. They do the same thing for plasma-generated E and B sources as for bar-magnet-like sources or for unspecified E and B sources.
You are proposing, as I said, a
low mass source (some plasma structure with its own internal currents) trying to exert a force on a
high mass object. The Coulomb calculation cannot produce a large force. The Lorentz calculation cannot produce a large force.
Let's look again at the dipole. The dipole is different---if you put the source very close, then the gradient can be larger compared with a source far away, so my 1/r^3 calculation wasn't quite the right one. Fortunately I gave you all the relevant numbers, so let's go all the way. You want an exact dipole force calculation for a super-nearby source---like current loops in this imaginary "entraining" plasma? You would get a 10^20N force on the solar dipole if there's a magnetic field which rises from 0 on one side to 10^7 T on the other side. I.e., if there were a
young magnetar parked in the orbit of Mercury, maybe it could exert a 10^20 N force on the Sun. And the Sun would exert a -10^20 N force on it.
Does your "embedding" field have a strength like that? If not
it's not going to exert 10^20 N on the Sun, period. No combination of such forces is going to "fake" the appearance of a uniformly-attractive central force law (in the Galaxy) nor a cosmological expansion law.
"Maybe the field is that strong", perhaps you wonder, "and we haven't looked for it yet". Look for it yourself! Take a strong refrigerator magnet and hold it over your head. Did it get torn out of your hand and accelerated towards the constellation Sagittarius? No? Then there is not a 100 g/m field gradient in the inner solar system.
To conclude, MM, your mental picture of "embedding" things in plasma is
unphysical and totally wrong The standard picture of things "embedded" in a plasma and following it around applies exclusively to high-charge, low-mass objects. That's what the Solar Wind is, that's where Alfven waves act like waves, that's what Perratt simulated. High-mass objects, even ones with small excess charges, complex surface currents and fields, etc., simply
pass through plasmas subject to the small forces that Newton and Maxwell tells you about. To the extent that there is an object/plasma interaction at all, it consists mostly of the massive object
pushing the plasma aside---this, of course, requires only a small force, and small forces are exactly what you keep citing.
You cannot crank up the plasma-sourced field strengths high enough to "entrain" high-mass, low-charge objects. You seem to
daydream that it works, but the laws of physics disagree with you. We have given you the relevant numbers dozens of times, including here. Stop daydreaming and do some physics.
